Reperfusion therapy for acute ST-elevation and non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: What can be achieved in daily clinical practice in unselected patients at an interventional center?

References

• Antman EM, Bassand JP, Klein W, Ohman ME, Sendon JLL, Ryden L, et al. Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 959–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Society of Cardiology, American College of Cardiology. Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1502–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Long-term effects of intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: Final report of the GISSI study.Lancet 1987;2:871–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction.Lancet 1986;1:397–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: A quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003; 361: 13–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm CW, Arntz HR, Bode C, Giannitsis E, Katus H, Levenson B, et al. Leitlinien: Akutes koronarsyndrom (ACS), teil 2: Akutes koronarsyndrom mit ST-hebung. Z Kardiol 2004; 93: 324–41
   Google Scholar
• Boersma E. Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 779–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nallamothu BK, Bates ER. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: Is timing (almost) everything?. Am J Cardiol 2003; 92: 824–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand ME, Simoons ML, Fox KA, Wallentin LC, Hamm CW, McFadden E, et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 1809–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm CW, Arntz HR, Bode C, Giannitsis E, Katus H, Levenson B, et al. Leitlinien: Akutes koronarsyndrom (ACS), teil 1: Akutes koronarsyndrom ohne ST-hebung. Z Kardiol 2004; 93: 72–90
   Google Scholar
• Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF, Camici PG, Colombo A, Hamm C, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions: the task force for percutaneous coronary interventions of the European society of cardiology. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 804–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassand JP, Hamm CW, Ardissino D, Boersma E, Budaj A, Fernandez-Aviles F, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: The task force for the diagnosis and treatment of non-st-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 1598–660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner S, Schneider S, Schiele R, Fischer F, Dehn H, Grube R, et al. Acute myocardial infarction in Germany between 1996 and 1998: Therapy and intrahospital course. Results of the myocardial infarction registry (MIR) in Germany Z Kardiol 1999; 88: 857–67
   Google Scholar
• Fox KA, Cokkinos DV, Deckers J, Keil U, Maggioni A, Steg G. The ENACT study: A pan-European survey of acute coronary syndromes. European network for acute coronary treatment. Eur Heart J 2000; 21: 1440–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steg PG, Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Fox KA, Eagle KA, Flather MD, et al. Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes in the global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE). Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 358–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers KF, Dabbous OH, Flather MD, Starkey I, Jacob A, Macleod D, et al. Contemporary management of acute coronary syndromes: Does the practice match the evidence? The global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE). Heart 2005; 91: 290–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasdai D, Behar S, Wallentin L, Danchin N, Gitt AK, Boersma E, et al. A prospective survey of the characteristics, treatments and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes in Europe and the Mediterranean basin; the Euro heart survey of acute coronary syndromes (Euro Heart Survey ACS). Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 1190–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senges J, Wienbergen H, Gitt A. Die neue klassifikation der akuten koronarsyndrome und deren klinische bedeutung. MedRep 2002; 40: 3
   Google Scholar
• Fox KA, Goodman SG, Klein W, Brieger D, Steg PG, Dabbous O, et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes. Variations in practice and outcome; findings from the global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE). Eur Heart J 2002; 23: 1177–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juliard JM, Himbert D, Golmard JL, Aubry P, Karrillon GJ, Boccara A, et al. Can we provide reperfusion therapy to all unselected patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction?. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 30: 157–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koukkunen H, Penttila K, Kemppainen A, Penttila I, Halinen MO, Rantanen T, et al. Differences in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction by troponin T compared with clinical and epidemiologic criteria. Am J Cardiol 2001; 88: 727–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pell JP, Simpson E, Rodger JC, Finlayson A, Clark D, Anderson J, et al. Impact of changing diagnostic criteria on incidence, management, and outcome of acute myocardial infarction: Retrospective cohort study. Br Med J 2003; 326: 134–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitt AK, Schiele R, Meiser F. Myocardial infarction redefined: implication of the new definition of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on clinical practice. Results of the ACOS registry. (Abstract) Eur. Heart J 2001; 22: 3276
   Google Scholar
• Rosengren A, Wallentin L, Simoons M, Gitt AK, Behar S, Battler A, et al. Age, clinical presentation, and outcome of acute coronary syndromes in the Euroheart acute coronary syndrome survey. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 789–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalescot G, Dallongeville J, Van BE, Rouanet S, Baulac C, Degrandsart A, et al. STEMI and NSTEMI: are they so different? 1 year outcomes in acute myocardial infarction as defined by the ESC/ACC definition (the OPERA registry). Eur Heart J 2007; 28: 1409–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terkelsen CJ, Lassen JF, Norgaard BL, Gerdes JC, Jensen T, Gotzsche LB, et al. Mortality rates in patients with ST-elevation vs non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction: Observations from an unselected cohort. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 18–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiele F, Meneveau N, Seronde MF, Caulfield F, Fouche R, Lassabe G, et al. Compliance with guidelines and 1-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A prospective study. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 873–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassand JP, Danchin N, Filippatos G, Gitt A, Hamm C, Silber S, et al. Implementation of reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. A policy statement from the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 2733–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Halasyamani LK, et al. 2007 Focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines: Developed in collaboration with the Canadian Cardiovascular Society endorsed by the American Academy of Family Physicians: 2007 writing group to review new evidence and update the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, writing on behalf of the 2004 writing committee. Circulation 2008; 117: 296–329
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes DR, Jr, Berger PB, Hochman JS, Granger CB, Thompson TD, Califf RM, et al. Cardiogenic shock in patients with acute ischemic syndromes with and without ST-segment elevation. Circulation 1999; 100: 2067–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs AK, French JK, Col J, Sleeper LA, Slater JN, Carnendran L, et al. Cardiogenic shock with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock?. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 1091–6
   Google Scholar
• Zahn R, Schiele R, Seidl K, Hauptmann KE, Voigtlander T, Rupprecht HJ, et al. for the MITRA Study Group. Spectrum of reperfusion strategies and factors influencing the use of primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to hospitals with the facilities to perform primary angioplasty. Heart 1999; 82: 420–5
   Google Scholar
• Zahn R, Schiele R, Seidl K, Bergmeier C, Schuster S, Hauptmann KE, et al. for the MITRA Study Group. Primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction: Differences between referred patients and those treated in hospitals with on-site facilities?. J Invas Cardiol 1999; 11: 213–9
   Google Scholar
• Gersh BJ, Antman EM. Selection of the optimal reperfusion strategy for STEMI: Does time matter?. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 761–3
   Google Scholar