Assessing the efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of assistive technology interventions for enhancing mobility

References

• Fuhrer M J, Jutai J W, Scherer M J, DeRuyter F. A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25: 1243–1251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, Demers L, Deruyter F. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil: Ass Tech 2007; 2: 1–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeRuyter F. The importance of outcome measures for assistive technology service delivery systems. Technol Disabil 1997; 6: 89–104
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrer M J. Assistive technology outcomes research: challenges met and yet unmet. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80: 528–535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith R O. Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: challenge and innovation. Assist Technol 1996; 8: 71–81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenker J A, Scherer M J, Fuhrer M J, Jutai J W, DeRuyter F. Psychometric and administrative properties of measures used in assistive technology device outcomes research. Assist Technol 2005; 17: 7–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm M B. Our mandate for the new millennium: evidence-based practice. Am J Occup Ther 2000; 54: 575–585
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manns P J, Darrah J. Linking research and clinical practice in physical therapy: strategies for integration. Physiotherapy 2006; 92: 88–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 2001
   Google Scholar
• Sackett D L, Straus S E, Richardson W S, Rosenberg W, Haynes R B. Evidence based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM(2nd ed.). Churchill Livingstone, London 2000
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Medicare Coverage Center [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/center/coverage.asp
   Google Scholar
• Carlson D, Ehrlich N. Sources of payment for assistive technology: findings from a national survey of persons with disabilities. Assist Technol 2006; 18: 77–86
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Medicare Coverage Database [Internet], Decision Memo for Mobility Assistive Equipment (CAG-00274N). Available from: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewdecisionmemo.asp?id=143
   Google Scholar
• Consortium for Assistive Technology Outcomes Research [Internet], Available from: http://www.atoutcomes.com/ATOCdefault.htm
   Google Scholar
• Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth A L, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, Tyrer P. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. Br Med J 2000; 321: 694–696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston M, Sherer M, Whyte J. Applying evidence standards to rehabilitation research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 85: 292–309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach L J, Ambron S R, Dornbusch S M, Hess R D, Hornik R C, Phillips D C, Walker D F, Weiner S S. Toward reform of program evaluation: aims, methods, and institutional arrangements. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA 1980
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey M W. Theory as method: small theories of treatments. Conference proceedings: research methodology – strengthening causal interpretations of non-experimental data, L Sechrest, E Perrin, J Bunker. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, MD 1990; 33–52
   Google Scholar
• Fuhrer M J. An overview of clinical trials in medical rehabilitation: impetuses, challenges, and needed future directions. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 82: S8–S15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jutai J W, Fuhrer M J, Demers L, Scherer M J, DeRuyter F. Toward a taxonomy of assistive technology device outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 294–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust K L, Smith R O. Assistive technology in the measurement of rehabilitation and health outcomes – A review and analysis of instruments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 84: 780–793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technol Disabil 2002; 14: 101–105
   Google Scholar
• Day H, Jutai J, Campbell K A. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead. Disabil Rehabil 2002; 24: 31–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dharne M G, Lenker J, Harris F, Sprigle S (2006) Content validity of Assistive Technology Outcome Measure (ATOM), Version 2. RESNA 29th International Conference, Atlanta, GA, June, 23 – 262006. RESNA, Arlington, VA
   Google Scholar
• Rosen L, Manor O, Engelhard D, Zucker D. In defense of the randomized controlled trial for health promotion research. Am J Public Hlth 2006; 96: 1181–1186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piantadosi S. Clinical trials: a methodologic perspective. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ 2005
   Google Scholar
• Shadish W R, Cook T D, Campbell D T. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA 2002
   Google Scholar
• Cochrane A L. Efficiency and effectiveness. Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, London 1972
   Google Scholar
• Clark G N. Improving the transition from basic efficacy research to effectiveness studies: methodological issues and procedures. J Consulting Clin Psychol 1995; 63: 718–725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasgow R E, Lichtenstein E, Marcus A C. Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice?. Am J Public Hlth 2003; 93: 1261–1267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance G W, Feeny D. Utilities and quality-adjusted life years. Int J Technol Assess Hlth Care 1989; 5: 559–575
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dougherty C J. Quality-adjusted life years and the ethical values of health care. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74(Supplement)S29–S33
   Google Scholar
• Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine, M R Gold, J E Siegel, L B Russell, M C Weinstein. Oxford University Press, New York 1996
   Google Scholar
• Harris F, Sprigle S. Cost analysis in assistive technology research. Assist Technol 2003; 15: 16–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). Clinical Trials Network. National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health [Internet], Available from: http://www.nichd.nih.gov/research/supported/TBI.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America [Internet], Available from: http://www.resna.org/
   Google Scholar
• American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine [Internet], Available from: http://www.acrm.org/
   Google Scholar
• Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe [Internet], Available from: http://www.aaate.net/index.asp?auto-redirect=true&accept-initial-profile=standard
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR). Long-Range Plan for Fiscal Years 2005 – 2009 [Internet], Available from: http://www.ncddr.org/new/announcements/lrp/fy2005-2009/index.html
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR). Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers (RERCs) [Internet], Available from: http://www.naric.com/research/pd/type.cfm
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR). Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR), Phase II [Internet], Available from: http://www.naric.com/research/pd/results.cfm?type=type&display=detailed&criteria=Small%20Business%20Innovative%20Research%20(SBIR),%20Phase%20II
   Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health (NIH) Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects [Internet], Available from: http://crisp.cit.nih.gov/
   Google Scholar
• Kinsella K, Velkoff V A. An aging world: 2001. Series P95/01-1, US Census Bureau, Washington, DC 2001
   Google Scholar
• Norburn E K, Bernard S, Konrad T, Woomert A, DeFriese G, Kalsbeek W D, Koch G G, Ory M G. Self-care and assistance from others in coping with functional status limitations among a national sample of older adults. J Gerontol: Soc Sci 1995; 50B: S101–S109
   Google Scholar