Drafting standards on cognitive accessibility: a global collaboration

References

• United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol. Geneva: United Nations; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, World Bank. World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Dementia: a public health priority. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Report nr 9241564458.
   Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardisation. International standard ISO/DIS 9999: assistive products for persons with disability - classification and terminology. Annex A (informative). Geneva: ISO; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gould M, Leblois A, Cesa Bianchi F, et al. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, assistive technology and information and communication technology requirements: where do we stand on implementation? Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10:295–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J. Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities? Nurs Clin North Am. 2003;38:331–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney G. The use and usability of accessibility standardization. In: Azevedo L, Encarnação P, Gelderblom GJ, Newell A, editors. Assistive technology: from research to practice; AAATE 2013, assistive technology research series. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2013. p. 298–302.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Enable. Convention and optional protocol signatures and ratifications. Development and human rights for all. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wennberg B, Kjellberg A. Participation when using cognitive assistive devices-from the perspective of people with intellectual disabilities. Occup Ther Int. 2010;17:168–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstedt H, Umb-Carlsson Õ. Cognitive assistive technology and professional support in everyday life for adults with ADHD. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8:402–408.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adolfsson P, Lindstedt H, Pettersson I, et al. Perception of the influence of environmental factors in the use of electronic planning devices in adults with cognitive disabilities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014. [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2014.989418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie A, Best C, O'Neill B. Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012;18:DOI: 10.1017/S1355617711001548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funka. Stockholm; 2015. Available from: http://www.funka.com/en/our-assignments/research-and-innovation/archive—research-projects/understandable-information/.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. Geneva; 2016 - [cited 2016 25 February]; Available from: http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards_development.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Iwarsson S, Stahl A. Accessibility, usability and universal design-positioning and definition of concepts describing person-environment relationships. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:57–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg J, Lantz A, Gulliksen J. Accessibility to electronic communication for people with cognitive disabilities: a systematic search and review of empirical evidence. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2014;14:547–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preiser WF, Ostroff E. Universal design handbook. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardisation. International standard ISO 26800:2011 – Ergonomics – general approach, principles and concepts. Geneva: ISO; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardisation. International standard ISO/DIS 9241-11 Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 11: usability: definitions and concepts. Geneva: ISO; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Arthanat S, Bauer S, Lenker JA, et al. Conceptualization and measurement of assistive technology usability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:235–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organisation. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardisation. ISO/IEC guide 71:2014 - Guide for addressing accessibility in standards. Geneva: ISO; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gulliksen J, Harker S. The software accessibility of human-computer interfaces—ISO technical specification 16071. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2004;3:6–16.
   Google Scholar
• Thomack B. Time management for today's workplace demands. Workplace Health Saf. 2012;60:201–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen CH. Time use patterns of occupation. In: Christiansen CH, Baum CM, Bass-Haugen J, editors. Occupational therapy: performance, participation, and well-being. 3rd ed. Thorofare (NJ): Slack Incorporated; 2005. p. 70–91.
   Google Scholar
• Claessens BJC, van Eerde W, Rutte CG, et al. A review of the time management literature. Pers Rev. 2007;36:255–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkley R, Edwards G, Laneri M, et al. Executive functioning, temporal discounting, and sense of time in adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2001;29:541–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstedt H, Ivarsson AB, Söderlund A. Background factors related to and/or influencing occupation in mentally disordered offenders. Scand J Caring Sci. 2006;20:331–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bejerholm U, Eklund M. Time use and occupational performance among persons with schizophrenia. Occup Ther Ment Health. 2004;20:27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Valko L, Schneider G, Doehnert M, et al. Time processing in children and adults with ADHD. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2010;117:1213–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szelag E, Kowalska J, Galkowski T, et al. Temporal processing deficits in high-functioning children with autism. Br J Psychol. 2004;95:269–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen AL, Wilson RR. Unlocking the riddle of time in learning disability. J Intellect Disabil. 2006;10:9–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson LNM. The experience and management of temporality in five cases of dementia. Scand J Occup Ther. 2001;8:85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Janeslätt G, Kottorp A, Granlund M. Evaluating intervention using time aids in children with disabilities. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21:181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels R, Dijcks B, Soede M, et al. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature overview. Technol Disabil. 2003;15:231–238.
   Google Scholar
• Adolfsson P, Lindstedt H, Janeslätt G. How people with cognitive disabilities experience electronic planning devices. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37:379–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janeslätt G, Lindstedt H, Adolfsson P. Daily time management and influence of environmental factors on use of electronic planning devices in adults with mental disability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10:371–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: children & youth version: ICF-CY. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Janeslätt G, Granlund M, Kottorp A. Measurement of time processing ability and daily time management in children with disabilities. Disabil Health J. 2009;2:15–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janeslätt G, Lindstedt H, Adolfsson P. Daily time management and influence of environmental factors on use of electronic planning devices in adults with mental disability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;10:1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arvidsson G, Jonsson H. The impact of time aids on independence and autonomy in adults with developmental disabilities. Occup Ther Int. 2006;13:160–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grey I, Healy O, Leader G, et al. Using a Time Timer™ to increase appropriate waiting behavior in a child with developmental disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2009;30:359–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanScoy IJ, Fairchild SH. It's about time! Helping preschool and primary children understand time concepts. Young Child. 1993;48:21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce KL, Schreibman L. Teaching daily living skills to children with autism in unsupervised settings through pictorial self-management. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994;27:471–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing L. The autism spectrum: a guide for parents and professionals. London: Constable and Company Ltd.; 1996.
   Google Scholar