Assistive technology as reading interventions for children with reading impairments with a one-year follow-up

References

• Abascal J, Simone DJS, Colette N, et al. Rethinking universal accessibility: a broader approach considering the digital gap. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2016;15:179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björn Milrad M, Studenter med läs- och skrivsvårigheter som deltagare i högre utbildning [Students with reading and writing difficulties as participants in higher education] Linnaeus University Dissertations 2010; No 29/2010. ISBN: 978-91-86491-47-5.
   Google Scholar
• Ingesson SG. Growing up with dyslexia: interviews with teenagers and young adults. Sch Psychol Int. 2007;28:547–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNulty MA. Dyslexia and the life course. J Learn Disabil. 2003;36:363–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edyburn DL, Expanding the use of assistive technology while mindful of the need to understand efficacy. In: Edyburn D, editor. Efficacy of assistive technology interventions. UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2015; p. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gregg N. Increasing access to learning for the adult basic education learner with learning disabilities: evidence-based accommodation research. J Learn Disabil. 2012;45:47–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuttal J, Dyslexia and the kindle fire: using technology to overcome dyslexia. USA: James Nuttal; 2014. ISBN: 9781500999186.
   Google Scholar
• Gough PB, Tunmer WE. Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial Spec Educ. 1986;7:6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafson S, Samuelsson C, Johansson E, et al. How simple is the simple view of reading? Scand J Educ Res. 2013;57:292–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover WA, Gough PB. The simple view of reading. Read Writ Interdiscip J. 1990;2:127–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farquharson K, Tambyraja JL, Justice LM, et al. Using hierarchical linear modeling to examine how individual SLPs differentially contribute to children’s language and literacy gains in public schools. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015;24:504–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberg C. Att lära i en vidgad språklig rymd – ett språkdidaktiskt perspektiv [To learn in a widened language space – a language didactic perspective] In: Språk och lärande. Rapport från ASLA:s höstsymposium, ASLA: s skriftserie. Karlstad; 7–8 November 2002;16. p. 22–36.
   Google Scholar
• Dawe M, Desperately seeking simplicity: how young adults with cognitive disabilities and their families adopt assistive technologies. CHI Colorado: Center for Life Long Learning and Design, University of Colorado; 2006:22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Edyburn DA. Assistive technology and mild disabilities. Spec Educ Technol Pract. 2006;8:18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp WH. Using assistive technology with students with exceptional learning needs: when does an aid become a crutch? Read Writ Q 2005;21:193–196.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt AJ, McCallum E, Hennessey J, et al. Use of reading pen assistive technology to accommodate post-secondary students with reading disabilities. Assist Technol Off J RESNA. 2012;24:229–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer A, Savage R, Sanghera-Sidhu S, et al. Examining the effectiveness of technology use in classrooms: a tertiary meta-analysis. Comput Educ. 2014;78:140–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athanaselis T, Bakamidis S, Dologlou I, et al. Making assistive reading tools user friendly: a new platform for Greek dyslexic students empowered by automatic speech recognition. Multimed Tools Appl. 2012;68:681–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson I, Jacobson C. How persistent are phonological difficulties? A longitudinal study of reading retarded children. Dyslexia. 2005;12:3–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunmer W, Greany K. Defining dyslexia. J Learn Disabil. 2009;43:229–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino MT, Beecher CC. Assistive technology policy: promoting inclusive education for students with reading disabilities. Northwest Passage Spring; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson C. How persistent is reading disability? Individual growth curves in reading. Dyslexia. 1999;5:78–93.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel L, Understanding dyslexia and other learning disabilities. Canada: Pacific Educational Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Aaron PG, Joshi M, Williams KA. Not all reading disabilities area like. J Learn Disabil. 1999;32:120–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman JW, Tunmer WE, Prochnow JE. Does success in the reading recovery program depend on developing proficiency in phonological-processing skills? A longitudinal study in a whole language instructional context. Sci Stud Read. 2009;2:141–176.
   Google Scholar
• Denton CA, Fletcher JM, Anthony JL, et al. An evaluation of intensive intervention for students with persistent reading difficulties. J Learn Disabil. 2006;39:442–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Otaiba S, Fuchs D. Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective? An experimental and longitudinal study. J Learn Disabil. 2006;39:414–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fälth L, Gustafson S, Tjus T, et al. Computer assisted interventions targeting reading skills: a longitudinal study. Dyslexia. 2013;19:37–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fälth L, Gustafson S, Svensson I, et al. Lärarnas erfarenheter av deltagande i en datorbaserad interventionsstudie som syftar till att öka elevernas läsförmåga. Acta Didactica. 2014;8:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Vellution JM, Fletcher JM, Snowling MJ, et al. Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006;45:12–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment. Dyslexia in children and adolescents – tests and interventions. 2014; Report: 225. ISBN: 978-91-85413-66-9.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson-Inman L, Horney MA. Supported eText: assistive technology through text transformations. Read Res Q. 2007;42:153–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allington RL. What really matters when working with struggling readers. Read Teach. 2013;66:520–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung CKA, Slavin R. Effects of educational technology applications on reading outcomes for struggling readers: a best-evidence synthesis. Read Res Q. 2013;48:277–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fälth L, Svensson I. An app as ‘reading glasses’ – a study of the interaction between individual and assistive technology for students with a dyslexic profile. Int J Teach Educ. 2015;3:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Rose J. Identifying and teaching children and young people with dyslexia and literacy difficulties. Secretary of state for children, schools and families, June 2009; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Barden O. Facebook levels the playing field: dyslexic students learning through digital literacies. Res Learn Technol. 2014;22:18535.
   Google Scholar
• Edyburn D. Technology – enhanced reading performance: defining a research agenda. Read Res Q. 2007;42:146–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparini AA, Culen AL. Tablet PCs – an assistive technology for students with reading difficulties? The fifth international conference on advances in computer-human interactions. IARIA; 2012. ISBN: 978-1-61208-177-9 28.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey N. Teacher and student ratings of self-esteem in developmental dyslexia. Br J Spec Educ. 2002;29:29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts KD, Stodden R. Research synthesis on assistive technology use by people with learning disabilities and difficulties. Manoa: Center on Disability Studies, University of Hawaii; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• White DH, Robertson L. Implementing assistive technologies: a study on co-learning in the Canadian elementary school context. Comput Human Behav. 2015;51:1268–1275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulfari D, Celesti A, Villari MA. Computer system architecture providing a user-friendly man machine interface for accessing assistive technology in cloud computing. J Syst Softw. 2015;100:129–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diebel K. A convenient heuristic model for understanding assistive technology adoption. Seattle: University of Washington, AMC. 978-1-4503-2405-2/13/10; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol. 1993;5:36–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reimer- Reiss ML, Wacker RR. Factors associated with assistive technology discontinuance among individuals with disabilities. J Rehabil. 2000;66:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsobhi AY, Khan N, Rahanu H, Toward linking dyslexia types and symptoms to the available assistive technologies. IEEE 14th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies; 2014. doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2014.174.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson NS, Follette WC, Revenstorf D. Psychotherapy outcome research: methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behav Ther. 1984;15:336–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker DC, Zaslofsky AF, Burns MK, et al. A brief report of the diagnostic accuracy of oral reading fluency and reading inventory levels for reading failure risk among second- and third-grade students. ReadWrit Q. 2015;31:56–67.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson C. Läskedjor™ – manual [reading chains – manual]. Stockholm: Psykologiförlaget; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Elwér Å, Fridolfsson I, Samulesson S, et al. LäSt: Tolkning i Läsning och Stavning för åk 1-6 [Read, assessment in reading and spelling for school year 1-6] Stockholm: Hogrefe; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg I. Vilken bild är rätt? [Which picture is correct?] Stockholm: Natur & Kultur läromedel; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg I. Läsningens psykologi och pedagogik. [The psychology and pedagogy of reading] Stockholm: Natur & Kultur; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Rack JP, Snowling MJ, Olson RK. The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: a review. Read Res Q. 1992;27:29–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warmington M, Stothard SE, Snowling MJ. Assessing dyslexia in higher education: The York adult assessment battery revised. J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2013;13:48–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hauer K. Computerspil som læringsarena: Hvad kan børn lære af computerspil? [Computer games a learning platform: what can children learn from computer games?] Köpenhamn: Nationalt Videncenter for læsning; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2003;24:105–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson C. Word recognition index (WRI) as a quick screening marker of dyslexia. Irish J Psychol. 1995;16:260–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson C, Lundberg I. Early prediction of individual growth in reading. Read Writ Interdiscip J. 2000;13:273–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich K. Matthew effects in reading: some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Read Res Q. 1986;21:360–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cipielewski J, Stanovich KE. Predicting growth in reading ability from children's exposure to print. J Exp Child Psychol. 1992;54:74–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksson J, Lindqvist R, Bergström E. Struggling for recognition and inclusion parents’ and pupils’ experiences of special support measures in school. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2010;5:4646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddick B. An examination of the relationship between labelling and stigmatisation with special reference to dyslexia. Disabil Soc. 2000;15:653–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solvang P. Developing an ambivalence perspective on medical labelling in education: case dyslexia. Int Stud Sociol Educ. 2007;17:79–94. ISSN: 0962-0214 (print)/ISSN 1747-5066 (online)/07/010079-16. doi: 10.1080/09620210701433779.
   Google Scholar
• Denhart H. Deconstructing barriers: perceptions of students labeled with learning disabilities in higher education. J Learn Disabil. 2008;41:483–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A, Barbaranelli C, Caprara GV, et al. Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Dev. 1996;67:1206–1222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalavany BA, Carawan LW. Perceived family support and self-esteem: the mediational role of emotional experience in adults with dyslexia. Dyslexia Int J Res Pract. 2012;18:58–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar