Development and validation of a remote home safety protocol

References

• Chase CA, Mann K, Wasek S, et al. Systematic review of the effect of home modification and fall prevention programs on falls and the performance of community-dwelling older adults. Am J Occup Ther. 2012;66:284–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Close J, Ellis M, Hooper R, et al. Prevention of falls in the elderly trial (PROFET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999;353:93–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ, et al. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:11.
   Google Scholar
• Kowalczewski J, Chong SL, Galea M, et al. In-home tele-rehabilitation improves tetraplegic hand function. Neurorehabil Neural Rep. 2011;25:412–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piron L, Tonin P, Trivello E, et al. Motor tele-rehabilitation in post-stroke patients. Med Inform Internet Med. 2004;29:119–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zampolini M, Todeschini E, Bernabeu Guitart M, et al. Tele-rehabilitation: present and future. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2008;44:125–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett TE, Chumbler NR, Vogel WB, et al. The cost-utility of a care coordination/home telehealth programme for veterans with diabetes. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13:318–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein SM, Speedie SM, Potthoff S. Home telehealth improves clinical outcomes at lower cost for home healthcare. Telemed J E Health. 2006;12:128–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitt SM, Clayton L. The cost-effectiveness of telehealth in metropolitan hospitals. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8:42–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanford JA, Hoenig H, Griffiths PC, et al. A comparison of televideo and traditional in-home rehabilitation in mobility impaired older adults. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2007;25:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Chumbler NR, Quigley P, Li X, et al. Effects of telerehabilitation on physical function and disability for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2012;43:2168–2174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeary DD, McGeary CA, Gatchel RJ. A comprehensive review of telehealth for pain management: where we are and the way ahead. Pain Pract. 2012;12:570–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler TN, Yellowlees P. Cost analysis of store-and-forward telepsychiatry as a consultation model for primary care. Telemed J E Health. 2012;18:74–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whited JD, Warshaw EM, Kapur K, et al. Clinical course outcomes for store and forward teledermatology versus conventional consultation: a randomized trial. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19:197–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanepoel DW, Clark JL, Koekemoer D, et al. Telehealth in audiology: the need and potential to reach underserved communities. Int J Audiol. 2010;49:195–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg L, Reinhard SC, Houser A, et al. Valuing the invaluable: 2011 update-the growing contributions and costs of family caregiving [Internet]. Washington (DC): AARP Public Policy Institute; 2011 [cited 2015 March 23]. Available from: http://www.aarp.org/relationships/caregiving/info-07-2011/valuing-the-invaluable.html
   Google Scholar
• Rudman D, Hannah S. An instrument evaluation framework: description and application to assessments of hand function. J Hand Ther. 1998;11:266–277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clemson L, Fitzgerald MH, Heard R. Content validity of an assessment tool to identify home fall hazards: the Westmead home safety assessment. Br J Occup Ther. 1999;62:171–179.
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid JP, Aagard JA, O’Hara JW, et al. Computer readability editing system. IEEE Trans Profess Commun. 1981;38–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Cancer Institute. Making communications work. Bethesda (MD): National Cancer Institute; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Health Education Resource Exchange. Guidelines for developing easy-to-read health education materials. Washington (DC): US Department of Health; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• United States. Securities and Exchange Commission. Office of Investor Education. A plain English handbook: how to create clear SEC disclosure documents. Washington (DC): The Office; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Aldridge MD. Writing and designing readable patient education materials. Nephrol Nurs J. 2004;31:373–377.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bass L. Health literacy: implications for teaching the adult patient. J Infus Nurs. 2005;28:15–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Teaching patients with low literacy skills. Philadelphia (PA): JB Lippincott; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, Worrall L. Designing effective written health education materials: considerations for health professionals. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:1166–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis D, Eysenbach G, Kukafka R, et al. Consumer health informatics: informing consumers and improving health care. Inform Soc. 2007;23:415–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housen P, Shannon GR, Simon B, et al. What the resident meant to say: use of cognitive interviewing techniques to develop questionnaires for nursing home residents. Gerontologist. 2008;48:158–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin DE, Varni JW, Yeatts K, et al. Cognitive interviewing methodology in the development of a pediatric item bank: a patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) study. Health Qual Life Outc. 2009;7:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtagh FE, Addington-Hall JM, Higginson IJ. The value of cognitive interviewing techniques in palliative care research. Palliat Med. 2007;21:87–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yorkston KM, Baylor CR, Dietz J, et al. Developing a scale of communicative participation: a cognitive interviewing study. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:425–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haun J, Noland Dodd VJ, Graham-Pole J, et al. Testing a health literacy screening tool: implications for utilization of a BRIEF health literacy indicator. Fed Practition. 2009;26:24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Janice M, Morse PNS, J, Corbin B, et al. Developing grounded theory. The second generation. Edited by Press LC. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ungar M. ‘Too ambitious’ what happens when funders misunderstand the strengths of qualitative research design. Qual Soc Work. 2006;5:261–277.
   Google Scholar
• Clemson L, Fitzgeral MH, Heard R, et al. Inter-rater reliability of a home fall hazards assessment tool. Occup Ther J Res. 1999;19:83–100.
   Google Scholar
• Watt T, Rasmussen AK, Groenvold M, et al. Improving a newly developed patient-reported outcome for thyroid patients, using cognitive interviewing. Qual Life Res. 2008;17:1009–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar