Full-participation of students with physical disabilities in science and engineering laboratories

References

• Carnevale AP, Smith N, Strohl J. Help wanted: projections of jobs and education requirements through 2018. Washington (DC): Georgetown Center on Education and the Workforce; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fogarty D. Critical shortages of precision machining and industrial maintenance occupations in Pennsylvania’s manufacturing sector. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Workforce Investment Board and the Pennsylvania Department of Labor & Industry; 2010. Available from: https://www.ccac.edu/uploadedFiles/Pages/Workforce_Solutions/Business_and_Industry_Professional_Development/PACenter for Advanced Manufacturing Careers 2010 Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Miner DL, Nieman R, Swanson AB, et al. Teaching chemistry to students with disabilities: a manual for high schools, colleges, and graduate programs. 4th ed. Washington (DC): American Chemical Society, Office of Professional Training; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation and National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (NSF). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2015 digest. Special Report NSF; 2015. p. 15–311. Available from: http://doi.org/SpecialReportNSF11-309.
   Google Scholar
• Supalo CA, Isaacson MD, Lombardi MV. Making hands-on science learning accessible for students who are blind or have low vision. J Chem Educ. 2013;91:195–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. Persons with a disability: labor force characteristics summary – 2014 data. Washington (DC): Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Burgstahler S, Chang C. Promising interventions for promoting STEM fields to students who have disabilities. Rev Disab Stud Int J. 2014;5:29–47.
   Google Scholar
• Duerstock B, Hilliard L, Dunstun P, et al. 3D simulation of an accessible biomedical lab. In: 29th Annual International Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference Scientific/Research Proceedings. San Diego; 2013. p. 220–231.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel N, Wolfe G, Mahaffy C, et al. The modification of general chemistry laboratories for use by students with disabilities. J Rehabil. 1994;5.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips C, Giasolli M. Assistive technology enhancement using human factors engineering. In: Proceedings of the 1997 Sixteenth Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference. IEEE; 1997. p. 26–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. U.S. Census Bureau; 2013. Available from: http://factfinder2.census.gov.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Labor. U.S. Department of Labor – Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) – FAQ: section 503 final rule. Washington (DC): Rehabilitation Act of 1973; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Duerstock B, Hilliard L, McDonagh D, et al. Technologies to facilitate the active participation and independence of persons with disabilities in STEM from college to careers. From college to careers: fostering inclusion of persons with disabilities in STEM; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• PCAST. Report to the president on capturing domestic competitive advantage in advanced manufacturing. Washington (DC): PCAST; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bargerhuff ME, Cowan H, Kirch SA. Working toward equitable opportunities for science students with disabilities: using professional development and technology. Disab Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:125–135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mansoor A, Ahmed WM, Samarapungavan A, et al. AccessScope project: accessible light microscope for users with upper limb mobility or visual impairments. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:143–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Supalo CA, Hill AA, Larrick CG. Summer enrichment programs to foster interest in STEM education for students with blindness or low vision. J Chem Educ. 2014;91:1257–1260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman B. Definitions, models, classifications, schemes, and applications. In: Albrecht GL, Seelman KD, Bury M, editors. Handbook of disability studies. Thouasand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2001. p. 97–122.
   Google Scholar
• Mihaylov SI, Jarvis SN, Colver AF, et al. Identification and description of environmental factors that influence participation of children with cerebral palsy. Develop Med Child Neurol. 2004;46:299–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duerstock B. Accessible microscopy workstation for students and scientists with mobility impairments. Assist Technol. 2006;18:34–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French D, McBee K, Harmon MG, et al. Digital and analog video equipment as assistive technology in dissection-intensive labs: potential benefits to students with disabilities. Am Biol Teach. 2003;65:653–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grout I. Supporting access to STEM subjects in higher education for students with disabilities using remote laboratories. In: Proceedings of 2015 12th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation, REV 2015, (February). p. 7–13. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1109/REV.2015.7087284.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn C, Rabren KS, Taylor SL, et al. Assisting students with high-incidence disabilities to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Intervent School Clin. 2012;48:47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule AC, Stefanich GP. Using a thinking skills system to guide discussions during a working conference on students with disabilities pursuing STEM fields. J STEM Educ Innov Res. 2012;13:43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Howard LA, Potts EA, Linz E. Reaching the next Stephen Hawking: five ways to help students with disabilities in advanced placement science classes. Sci Teach. 2013;80:38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Lunsford SK, Bargerhuff ME. A project to make the laboratory more accessible to students with disabilities. J Chem Educ. 2006;83:407–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JK, Stumbo NJ, Martin LG, et al. Recruitment of students with disabilities: exploration of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. J Postsecond Educ Disabil. 2011;24:285–299.
   Google Scholar
• Mastropieri MA, Scruggs T. Science for students with disabilities. Rev Educ Res. 1992;62:377–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabian A, Olson JT, Ehlers G, et al. Encourage students with physical disabilities to study science, mathematics, engineering and technology: program ACCESS. In: American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition; 2001. p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Burgstahler S. Increasing the representation of people with disabilities in science, engineering, and mathematics. Information technology and disability; 1994. Available from: https://www.washington.edu/doit/Brochures/Careers/representation.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hilliard L, Dunston P, McGlothlin J, et al. Designing beyond the ADA – creating an accessible research laboratory for students and scientists with physical disabilities. In: RESNA; 2013. Available from: http://www.resna.org/sites/default/files/legacy/conference/proceedings/2013/JEA/Hilliard.html.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg MR, Cooper RA, Ding D, et al. Using experiential learning to inspire, educate, and empower underrepresented undergraduates in STEM. Am Soc Eng Educ. 2011;18:1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Weisgerber RA. Successful science for students with disabilities. College Teach. 1994;42:55–56.
   Google Scholar
• Burgstahler S. Teaching lab courses to students with disabilities. Information technologies and disabilities; 1996. Available from: http://www.rit.edu/easi/itd.html.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Exposure draft for comment. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Heidari F. Laboratory barriers in science, engineering, and mathematics for students with disabilities; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:e1–e34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar