Does power mobility training impact a child’s mastery motivation and spectrum of EEG activity? An exploratory project

References

• Anderson DI, Campos JJ, Witherington DC, et al. The role of locomotion in psychological development. Front Psychol. 2013;4:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos JJ, Anderson DI, Barbu-Roth M, et al. Travel broadens the mind. Infancy. 2000;1:149–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson EJ. Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. Annu Rev Psychol. 1988;39:1–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foreman N, Foreman D, Cummings A, et al. Locomotion, active choice, and spatial memory in children. J Gen Psychol. 1990;117:215–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone R, Field D. Systematic review of power mobility outcomes for infants, children and adolescents with mobility limitations. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28:954–964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone R, Paleg G. Practice considerations for the introduction and use of power mobility for children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56:210–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan JH, Thomas JR, Downing JH. Locomotion improves children’s spatial search: a meta-analytic review. Percept Mot Skills. 1998;87:67–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kermoian R, Campos JJ. Locomotor experience: a facilitator of spatial cognitive development. Child Dev. 1988;59:908–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkin J. The need for the development of a child led assessment tool for powered mobility users. Technol Disabil. 2002;14:163–171.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone R. A critical review of powered mobility assessment and training for children. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:392–400.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson L, Nyberg P. Driving to learn – a new concept for training children with profound cognitive disabilities. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57:229–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson L, Eklund M, Nyberg P, et al. Driving to learn in a powered wheelchair: the process of learning joystick use in people with profound cognitive disabilities. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65:652–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson L, Nyberg P. Single-switch control versus powered wheelchair for training cause-effect relationships: case studies. Technol Disabil. 1999;11:35–38.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson L, Nyberg P, Eklund M. Training characteristics important for growing consciousness of joystick-use in people with profound cognitive disabilities. Int J Therapy Rehab. 2010;17:588–595.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson L, Durkin J. Powered mobility intervention: understanding the position of tool use learning as part of implementing the ALP tool. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol. 2017;730–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenyon LK, Farris J, Brockway K, et al. Promoting self-exploration and function through an individualized power mobility training program. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2015;27:200–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenyon LK, Farris JF, Gallagher C, et al. Power mobility training for young children with multiple, severe impairments: a case series. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2017;37:19–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget J. The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press; 1952.
   Google Scholar
• White RW. Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychol Rev. 1959;66:297–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igoe D, Peralta C, Jean L, et al. A pilot evaluation of the test-retest score reliability of the dimensions of mastery questionnaire in preschool-aged children. Infants Young Child. 2011;24:280–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan GA, Busch-Rossnagel NA, Barrett KC, et al. The dimensions of mastery questionnaire (DMQ): a manual about its development, psychometrics, and use; 2009 [internet]; [cited 2017 Apr 27]. Available from: http://www.mychhs.colostate.edu/gmorgan/docs/DMQmanual(05-11-2009).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao R, Xiao Q, Alejandro P, et al. Characterization of infant mu rhythm immediately before crawling: a high-resolution EEG study. Neuroimage. 2017;146:47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedermeyer E. Lopes da Silva FH. Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields. 6 ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Borghini G, Arico P, GrazianiI, et al. Quantitative assessment of the training improvement in a motor-cognitive task by using EEG, ECG and EOG signals. Brain Topogr. 2016;29:149–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazi MA, Nash MD, Fagg AH, et al. Novel assistive device for teaching crawling skills to infants. Springer Tracts Adv Robotics. 2016;113:593–605.
   Google Scholar
• Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Bartlett D, et al. The Gross Motor Function Classification System—expanded and revised; 2007 [internet]; [cited 2016 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.canchild.ca/en/resources/42-gross-motor-function-classification-system-expanded-revised-gmfcs-e-r.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasson AC, Ullenhag A, Wahlstr€om U, et al. Mini-MACS: development of the manual ability classification system for children younger than 4 years of age with signs of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59:72–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidecker MJC, Paneth N, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Developing and validating the communication function classification system for individuals with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:704–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellers D, Mandy A, Pennington L, et al. Development and reliability of a system to classify the eating and drinking ability of people with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56:245–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majnemer A, Shikako-Thomas K, Lach L, et al. Mastery motivation in adolescents with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:3384–3392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller L, Marnane K, Ziviani J, et al. The dimensions of mastery questionnaire in school-aged children with congenital hemiplegia: test–retest reproducibility and parent–child concordance. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2014;34:168–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley SM, Coster WJ, Dumas HM, et al. Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory – Computer Adaptive Test manual; 2012 [internet]; [cited 2017 Apr 27]. Available from: https://s3.amazonaws.com/pedicat/PEDI-CAT-Manual-1-3-6.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. Canadian occupational performance measure. 5th ed. Ottawa, Canada: CAOT Publications ACE; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Butler C, Okamoto GA, McKay TM. Motorized wheelchair driving by disabled children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984;65:95–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson L, Durkin J. Assessment of learning powered mobility use—applying grounded theory to occupational performance. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51:963–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gierach J. Assessing students’ needs for assistive technology 5 ed. 2009 [internet]; [cited 2015 May 6]. Available from: http://wati.org/content/supports/free/pdf/ASNAT5th-EditionJun09.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher WW, Piazza CC, Bowman LG, et al. Integrating caregiver report with a systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification. Am J Ment Retard. 1996;101:15–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenyon LK, Farris JP, Cain B, et al. Development and content validation of the power mobility training tool. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol. 2017. DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1278468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byiers BJ, Reichle J, Symons FJ. Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practice. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012;21:397–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourbakhsh MR, Ottenbacher KJ. The statistical analysis of single-subject data: a comparative examination. Phys Ther. 1984;74:768–776.
   Google Scholar
• Klimesch W. EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Res Rev. 1999;29:169–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orekhova EV, Stroganova TA, Posikera IN, et al. EEG theta rhythm in infants and preschool children. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1047–1062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Community Health Medicaid Provider Manual. 2016 [internet]; [cited 2017 Apr 27]. Available from: http://www.michigan.gov/mdhhs/0,5885,7-339–87572–,00.html.
   Google Scholar
• Langer N, Pedroni A, Gianotti LR, et al. Functional brain network efficiency predicts intelligence. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33:1393–1406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virji-Babul N, Rose A, Moiseeva N, et al. Neural correlates of action understanding in infants: influence of motor experience. Brain Behav. 2012;2:237–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Heuvel MP, Stam CJ, Kahn RS, et al. Efficiency of functional brain networks and intellectual performance. J Neurosci. 2009; 29:7619–7624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar