The development and evaluation of a web-based programme to support problem-solving skills following brain injury

References

• Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado V. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002–2006. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Selassie AW, Zaloshnja E, Langlois JA, et al. Incidence of long-term disability following traumatic brain injury hospitalization, United States, 2003. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008;23:123–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaloshnja E, Miller T, Langlois JA, et al. Prevalence of long-term disability from traumatic brain injury in the civilian population of the United States, 2005. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2008;23:394–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Report to Congress on Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: epidemiology and rehabilitation. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Yishay Y, Daniels-Zide E. Examined lives: outcomes after holistic rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 2000;45:112–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho CA, DeRuyter F, Stein M. Treatment efficacy: cognitive-communicative disorders resulting from traumatic brain injury. J Speech Hear Res. 1996;39:S5–S17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kreutzer J, Marwitz J, Walker W, et al. Moderating factors in return to work and job stability after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;18:128–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Mateer CA. Cognitive rehabilitation: an integrative neuropsychological approach. New York (NY): Guildford Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Sohlberg MM, Turkstra LS. Optimizing cognitive rehabilitation: effective instructional methods. New York (NY): Guilford Publications; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Stierwalt JA, Murray LL. Attention impairment following traumatic brain injury. Semin Speech Lang. 2002;23:129–138.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson B, Berglund P, Rönnbäck L. Mental fatigue and impaired information processing after mild and moderate traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 2009;23:1027–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy MRT, Coelho C, Turkstra L, et al. Intervention for executive functions after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review, meta-analysis and clinical recommendations. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18:257–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Feeney TJ. Collaborative brain injury intervention: positive everyday routines. San Diego (CA): Singular Publishing Group, Inc.; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Rao V, Lyketsos C. Neuropsychiatric sequelae of traumatic brain injury. Psychosomatics. 2000;41:95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:519–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tate R, Kennedy M, Ponsford J, et al. INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, Part III: executive function and self-awareness. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2014;29:338–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine B, Robertson IH, Clare L, et al. Rehabilitation of executive functioning: an experimental-clinical validation of Goal Management Training. J Inter Neuropsych Soc. 2000;6:299–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasotti L, Kovacs F, Eling PATM, et al. Time pressure management as a compensatory strategy training after closed head injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2000;10:47–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Zurilla TJ, Nezu AM. Problem-solving therapies. In: Dobson KS, editor. Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2001. p. 211–245.
   Google Scholar
• Rath JF, Hradil AL, Litke DR, et al. Clinical applications of problem-solving research in neuropsychological rehabilitation: addressing the subjective experience of cognitive deficits in outpatients with acquired brain injury. Rehabil Psycho. 2011;56:320–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rath JF, Simon D, Langenbahn DM, et al. Group treatment of problem-solving deficits in outpatients with traumatic brain injury: a randomized outcome study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2003;13:461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spikman JM, Boelen DHE, Lamberts KF, et al. Effects of a multifaceted treatment program for executive dysfunction after acquired brain injury on indications of executive functioning in daily life. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010;16:118–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Cramon DY, Matthes-von Cramon G, Mai N. Problem-solving deficits in brain-injured patients: a therapeutic approach. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1991;1:45–64.
   Google Scholar
• Kreutzer JS, Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, Ripley D, et al. Charges and lengths of stay for acute and inpatient rehabilitation treatment of traumatic brain injury 1990–1996. Brain Inj. 2001;15:763–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine (IOM). Cognitive rehabilitation therapy for traumatic brain injury: evaluating the evidence. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Wehman P, Gentry T, West M, et al. Community integration: current issues in cognitive and vocational rehabilitation for individuals with ABI. JRRD. 2009;46:909–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geusgens CA, Winkens I, van Heugten CM, et al. Occurrence and measurement of transfer in cognitive rehabilitation: a critical review. Acta Derm Venereol. 2007;39:425–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner R, McDonnell J, Bellamy G. Teaching generalized skills: general case instruction in simulation and community settings. In: R Horner, L Meyer, H Fredericks, editor. Educ learners with severe hHandicaps. Baltimore (MD): Paul H. Brookes; 1986. p. 289–314.
   Google Scholar
• Stein M, Carnine D, Dixon R. Direct instruction: integrating curriculum design and effective teaching practice. Intervent School Clin. 1998;33:227–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner RH, Albin RW. Research on general-case procedures for learners with severe disabilities. Educ Treat Children. 1988;11:375–388.
   Google Scholar
• Carnine DW, Kameenui EJ, Woolfson N. Training of textual dimensions related to text-based inferences. J Reading Behav. 1982;14:335–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell LE, Glang A, Ettel D, et al. Systematic instruction for individuals with acquired brain injury: results of a randomised controlled trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2012;22:85–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M. Context-sensitive cognitive rehabilitation after brain injury: theory and practice. Brain Impair. 2003;4:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ehlhardt LA, Sohlberg MM, Kennedy M, et al. Evidence-based practice guidelines for instructing individuals with neurogenic memory impairments: what have we learned in the past 20 years? Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18:300–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell LE, Wallace T, Wild MR. Training-the-Trainer on assistive technology for cognition (ATC): current practices. Perspect Neurophysiol Neurogenic Speech Lang Disord. 2013;23:90–94.
   Google Scholar
• Wild MR. Organize your life using iOS5 on the iPad, iPhone, and iPod touch: making cognitive connections at home, school, and work. Laguna Hills (CA): ID 4 the Web; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wong D, Sinclair K, Seabrook E, et al. Smartphones as assistive technology following traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study of what helps and what hinders. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;1–8. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1226434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glang A, McLaughlin K, Schroeder S. Using interactive multimedia to teach parent advocacy skills: an exploratory study. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007;22:198–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin KA, Glang A, Beaver SV, et al. Web-based training in family advocacy. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013;28:341–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenberg MR, Ruwe WD, Dawson K, et al. Comparison of functional outcomes and treatment cost between a computer-based cognitive rehabilitation teletherapy program and a face-to-face rehabilitation program. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2008;39:169–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade SL, Walz NC, Carey J, et al. A randomized trial of teen online problem solving for improving executive function deficits following pediatric traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2010;25:409–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade SL, Walz NC, Carey J, et al. A randomized trial of teen online problem solving: efficacy in improving caregiver outcomes after brain injury. Health Psychol. 2012;31:767–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng EMW, Polatajko HJ, Marziali E, et al. Telerehabilitation for addressing executive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2013;27:548–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergquist T, Yutsis M, Sullan M. Satisfaction with cognitive rehabilitation delivered via the internet in persons with acquired brain injury. Int J Telerehab. 2015;6:39–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wade SL, Karver CL, Taylor HG, et al. Counselor-assisted problem solving improves caregiver efficacy following adolescent brain injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2014;59:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurowski BG, Wade SL, Kirkwood MW, et al. Long-term benefits of an early online problem-solving intervention for executive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168:523–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Joode E, van Heugten C, Verhey F, et al. Efficacy and usability of assistive technology for patients with cognitive deficits: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:701–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoPresti EF, Bodine C, Lewis C. Assistive technology for cognition. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2008;27:29–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie A, Best C, O’Neill B. Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012;18:1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culley C, Evans JJ. SMS text messaging as a means of increasing recall of therapy goals in brain injury rehabilitation: a single-blind within-subjects trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010;20:103–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svoboda E, Richards B. Compensating for anterograde amnesia: a new training method that capitalizes on emerging smartphone technologies. J Inter Neuropsych Soc. 2009;15:629–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Emslie H, Quirk K, et al. A randomized control trial to evaluate a paging system for people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2005;19:891–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardone A, Sampson E, Stauffer C, et al. Project career: a qualitative examination of five college students with traumatic brain injuries. NRE. 2015;37:459–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall B. Participatory research. In: Husen T, Postlethwaite TN, editors. International encyclopedia of education London. Pergamon: Elsevier Science; 1994. p. 3330–3336.
   Google Scholar
• Rappaport M, Hall K, Hopkins K, et al. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1982;63:118–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouvier W, Blanton P, LaPorte K, et al. Reliability and validity of the Disability Rating Scale and the Levels of Cognitive Functioning Scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:94–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunderland A, Harris JE, Baddeley AD. Assessing everyday memory after severe head injury. In: Harris JE, Morris PE, editors. Everyday memory, actions, and absent-mindedness. London (UK): Academic Press; 1984. p. 191–206.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland A, Harris JE, Gleave J. Memory failures in everyday life following severe head injury. J Clin Neuropsychol. 1984;6:127–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein LH, Polkey CE. Everyday memory after unilateral temporal lobectomy or amygdalo-hippocampectomy. Cortex. 1992;28:189–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efklides A, Yiultsi E, Kangellidou T, et al. Wechsler memory scale, rivermead behavioral memory test, and everyday memory questionnaire in healthy adults and Alzheimer’s patients. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2002;18:63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth RM, Isquith PK, Gioia GA. BRIEF-A: behavior rating inventory of executive function – adult version. Lutz (FL): Psychological Assessment Resources; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Sherr RL, Langenbahn DM, Simon D, et al. Problem solving questionnaire. New York (NY): New York University School of Medicine, Rusk Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Rath JF, Langenbahn DM, Simon D, et al. The construct of problem solving in higher level neuropsychological assessment and rehabilitation. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2004;19:613–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rath JF, Simon D, Langenbahn DM, et al. Rusk Problem Solving Rating Form: unpublished manuscript, New York University School of Medicine, Rusk Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Azulay J. Perceived self-efficacy and life satisfaction after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007;22:257–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, et al. The satisfaction with life scale. J Personal Assess. 1985;49:71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J Usabil Stud. 2009;4:114–123.
   Google Scholar
• Feingold A. Effect sizes for growth-modeling analysis for controlled clinical trials in the same metric as for classical analysis. Psychol Methods. 2009;14:43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer DJ, Sterba SK, Hallfors DD. Evaluating group-based interventions when control participants are ungrouped. Multivariate Behav Res. 2008;43:210–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. Assistive technologies and other supports for people with brain impairment. New York (NY): Springer Publishing; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Brain Educations Strategies and Technology Inc. ReachMyGoals; 2017 [cited 2017 March 28]. Available from: http://myhealthyapp.com/product/reachmygoals-brain-education-strategies-and-technology-inc/
   Google Scholar