Pain, fatigue, function and participation among long-term manual wheelchair users partnered with a mobility service dog

References

• Kilkens OJ, Post MW, Dallmeijer AJ, et al. Relationship between manual wheelchair skill performance and participation of persons with spinal cord injuries 1 year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(3 Suppl 1):65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi YO, Lee HY, Lee MH, et al. Effects of ramp slope on physiological characteristic and performance time of healthy adults propelling and pushing wheelchairs. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27:7–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirchner CE, Gerber EG, Smith BC. Designed to deter. Community barriers to physical activity for people with visual or motor impairments. Am J Prev Med. 2008;4(4):349–52.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent C, Poissant L, Gagnon HD, et al. Consensus building for the development of guidelines for recommending mobility service dogs for people with motor impairments. Technol Disabil. 2016;28:67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Champagne A, Gagnon D, Vincent C, et al. Comparison of cardiorespiratory demand and rate of perceived exertion during propulsion in a natural environment with and without the use of a mobility assistance dog in manual wheelchair users. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95:685–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Lemoyne V, Gagnon D, Routhier F, et al. To what extent are upper limb efforts reduced when ascending a ramp with traction provided by a mobility assistance dog in experienced manual wheelchair users? J Appl Biomech. 2016;332:186–195.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent C, Gagnon D, Routhier F, et al. Service dogs in the province of Quebec: sociodemographic profile of users and the dogs impact on functional ability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;10:132–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen K, Blascovich J. The value of service dogs for people with severe ambulatory disabilities. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1996;275:1001–1006.
   Google Scholar
• Eddy J, Hart LA, Boltz RP. The effects of service dogs on social acknowledgments of people in wheelchairs. J Psychol. 1988;122:39–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MSDer B, Hart LA, Bergin B. Social acknowledgements for children with disabilities: effects of service dogs. Child Dev. 1989;60:1529–1534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rintala DH, Sachs-Ericsson N, Hart KA. The effects of service dogs on the lives of persons with mobility impairments: a pre-post study design. SCI Psychosocial Process. 2002;2:70–82.
   Google Scholar
• Lane DR, McNicholas J, Collis GM. Dogs for the disabled: benefits to recipients and welfare of the dog. Appl Anim Behav Sci.1998;59:49–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modlin S. From puppy to service dog: raising service dogs for the rehabilitation team. Rehabil Nurs. 2001;26:12–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collins DM, Fitzgerald SG, Sachs-Ericsson N, et al. Psychosocial well-being and community participation of service dog partners. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006;1:41–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shintani M, Senda M, Takayanagi T, et al. The effect of service dogs on the improvement of health-related quality of life. Acta Med Okayama. 2010;64:109–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkle M, Crowe TK, Hendrix I. Service dogs and people with physical disabilities partnerships: a systematic review. Occup Ther Int. 2012;19:54–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rintala DH, Matamoros R, Seitz LL. Effects of assistance dogs on persons with mobility or hearing impairments: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:489–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert G, Tousignant M, Routhier F, et al. Effect of service dogs on manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50:341–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent C, Gagnon DH, Routhier F, et al. Service dogs for people with spinal cord injury: outcomes regarding functional mobility and important occupations. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;217:847–851.
   Google Scholar
• MIRA Foundation. What is a service (assistance) dog? [cited 2015 March 16]. Available at: www.mira.ca/en/programs/7/service-assistance-dog-for-person-with-mobility-impairment_26.html.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis K, Roach K, Applegate E, et al. Reliability and validity of the Wheelchair User's Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI). Paraplegia. 1995;33:595–601.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–3191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translating adaptation. Value in Health. 2005;2:94–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert G. Index of Shoulder Pain for Manual Wheelchair Users © 1995 Curtis KA, Roach KE, Applegate EB, Amar T, Benbow C, Gualano J. Translated by Hubert G, Index de la douleur aux épaules des usagers de fauteuil roulant manuel, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Borg G. Borg's perceived exertion and pain scales. Human Kinetics Publishers; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Chen MJ, Fan X, Moe ST. Criterion-related validity of the Borg ratings of perceived exertion scale in healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2002;20:873–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JJ, Snown K, Kosinski M, et al. SF-36 health survey manual & interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard JL, Bouzourène K, Gallant S, et al. Validation et normes du SF-36 dans la population du canton de Vaud[Validation and SF-36 standards in the population of the canton of Vaud]. Lausanne: Institut universitaire de médecine sociale et préventive, 2000 (Raisons de santé, 28). French.
   Google Scholar
• Perneger TV, Leplège A, Etter JF, et al. Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) in young healthy adults. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:1051–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routhier F, Demers L, Kirby RL, et al. Programme d'habiletés en fauteuil roulant. Guide de la version canadienne-française du Wheelchair Skills Program (WSP) Version 3.2[Wheelchair Skills Program. Guide to the French-Canadian version of the Wheelchair Skills Program], 2006. Retrieved 2016-09-29. French. Available at: http://docplayer.fr/1861898-Programme-d-habiletes-en-fauteuil-roulant-guide-de-la-version-canadienne-francaise-du-wheelchair-skills-program-wsp-version-3-2.html
   Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Dupuis D, Macphee AH, et al. The wheelchair skills test (version 2.4): measurement properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:794–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountain AD, Kirby RL, Smith C. The Wheelchair Skills test, version 2.4: validity of an algorithm-based questionnaire version. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:416–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton AM, Kirby RL, MacPhee AH, et al. Evaluation of manual wheelchair skills: is objective testing necessary or would subjective estimates suffice? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1295–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacPhee AH, Kirby RL, Coolen AL, et al. Wheelchair skills training program: a randomized clinical trial of wheelchair users undergoing initial rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YT, Limroongreungrat W, Chang LS, et al. Immediate video feedback on ramp, wheelie, and curb wheelchair skill training for persons with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52:421–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Routhier F, Kirby RL, Demers L, et al. Can a service dog improve wheelchair skills? A case report. RESNA 2007 - 30th International Conference on Technology & Disability: Research, Design and Practice. June 15-19, 2007. Phoenix, AZ, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Routhier F, Demers L, Kirby RL, et al. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability of the French-Canadian Wheelchair Skills Test (version 3.2): preliminary findings. RESNA 2007 Conference. June 15-19, 2007. Phoenix, AZ, USA. June 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Hébert R, Bravo G, et al. Comparison of the Jamar dynamometer and the Martin vigorimeter for grip strength measurements in a healthy elderly population. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995;27:137–143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohannon RW. Adequacy of hand-grip dynamometry for characterizing upper limb strength after stroke. Isokinet Exerc Sci. 2004;12:263–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW. Hand-grip dynamometry provides a valid indication of upper extremity strength impairment in home care patients. Hand Ther. 1998;11:258–260.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon DH, Roy Gabison S, et al. Effects of seated postural stability and trunk and upper extremity strength on performance during manual wheelchair propulsion tests in individuals with spinal cord injury: an exploratory study. Rehabil Res Pract. Published online 2016 Aug 18. doi: 10.1155/2016/6842324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, et al. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am. 1984;9:222–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl MA, Paterson M, Davies D, et al. Validity and community utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther. 2000;67:22–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan CCH, Lee TMC. Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Occup Ther Int. 1997;4:229–247.
   Google Scholar
• Cup EH, Scholte op Reimer WJ, Thijssen MC, et al. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:402–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. Canadian occupational performance measure. 2 ed. Rev. Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wood-Dauphinee SL, Opzoomer MA, Williams JI, et al. Assessment of global function: the reintegration to normal living index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:583–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auger C, Demers L, Gélinas I, et al. Development of a French-Canadian version of the Life-Space Assessment (LSA-F): content validity, reliability and applicability for power mobility device users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009;4:31–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Auger C, Demers L, Gélinas I, et al. Life-space mobility of middle-aged and older adults at various stages of usage of power mobility devices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:765–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker PS, Bodner EV, Allman RM. Measuring life-space mobility in community-dwelling older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:1610–1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers AR, Anderson JJ, Miller DR, et al. Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:1435–1446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day FH, Jutai J. Measuring the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: the PIADS. Can J Rehabil. 1996;9:159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Monette M, Descent M, et al. The French Version of the Psychosocial Impact of Assisitive Devices (F-PIADS): translation and preliminary psychometric evaluation. Qual Life Res. 2007;11:583–592.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 1996;8:3–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demers L, Wessels R, Weiss-Lambrou R, et al. An international content validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). Occ Ther Int. 1999;6:159–175.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technol Disabil. 2002;14:101–105.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson medical® and Sammons Preston®. Jamar® Plus + Digital Hand Dynamometer – Users’ guide. [cited 2016 September 28]. Available at: https://content.pattersonmedical.com/PDF/spr/Product/286252.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon DH, Martin-Lemoyne V, Vincent C, et al. Mobility assistance dog reduces upper limb efforts during wheelchair propulsion on tiled and carpeted floors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:e80.
   Google Scholar
• Gagnon D, Blanchet M, Martin-Lemoyne V, et al. Using a mobility assistance dog reduces upper limb effort during manual wheelchair ramp ascent in an individual with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013;36:700–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algood SD, Cooper RA, Fitzgerald SG, et al. Effect of a pushrim-activated power-assist wheelchair on the functional capabilities of persons with tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:380–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper RA, Fitzgerald SG, Boninger ML, et al. Evaluation of a pushrim-activated, power-assisted wheelchair. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:702–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algood SD, Cooper RA, Fitzgerald SG, et al. Impact of a pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchair on the metabolic demands, stroke frequency, and range of motion among subjects with tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1865–1871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash MS, Koppens D, van Haaren M, et al. Power-assisted wheels ease energy costs and perceptual responses to wheelchair propulsion in persons with shoulder pain and spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:2080–2085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy CE, Chow JW, Tillman MD, et al. Variable-ratio pushrim-activated power-assist wheelchair eases wheeling over a variety of terrains for elders. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:104–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haubert L, Requejo P, Newsam C, et al. Comparison of energy expenditure and propulsion characteristics in a standard and three pushrim-activated power-assisted wheelchairs. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2005;11:64–73.
   Google Scholar