919
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Satisfaction and perceptions of long-term manual wheelchair users with a spinal cord injury upon completion of a locomotor training program with an overground robotic exoskeleton

, , , , &
Pages 138-145 | Received 31 Jul 2017, Accepted 30 Nov 2017, Published online: 19 Dec 2017

References

  • Esquenazi A, Talaty M, Jayaraman A. Powered exoskeletons for walking assistance in persons with central nervous system injuries: a narrative review. PM&R. 2017;9:46–62.
  • Louie DR, Eng JJ, Lam T. Gait speed using powered robotic exoskeletons after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and correlational study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:82.
  • Louie DR, Eng JJ. Powered robotic exoskeletons in post-stroke rehabilitation of gait: a scoping review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13:53.
  • Onose G, Cârdei V, Crăciunoiu ŞT, et al. Mechatronic wearable exoskeletons for bionic bipedal standing and walking: a new synthetic approach. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:343.
  • Miller LE, Zimmermann AK, Herbert WG. Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta-analysis. Med Devices. 2016;9:455–466.
  • Lajeunesse V, Vincent C, Routhier F, et al. Exoskeletons' design and usefulness evidence according to a systematic review of lower limb exoskeletons used for functional mobility by people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11:535–547.
  • Contreras-Vidal JL, Bhagat NA, Brantley J, et al. Powered exoskeletons for bipedal locomotion after spinal cord injury. J Neural Eng. 2016;13:031001.
  • Federici S, Meloni F, Bracalenti M, et al. The effectiveness of powered, active lower limb exoskeletons in neurorehabilitation: a systematic review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;37: 321–340.
  • Karelis AD, Carvalho LP, Castillo MJ, et al. Effect on body composition and bone mineral density of walking with a robotic exoskeleton in adults with chronic spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49:84–87.
  • Arazpour M, Samadian M, Bahramizadeh M, et al. The efficiency of orthotic interventions on energy consumption in paraplegic patients: a literature review. Spinal Cord. 2015;53:168–175.
  • Gagnon D, Escalona M, Vermette M, et al. Locomotor training using an overground robotic exoskeleton in long-term manual wheelchair users with a chronic spinal cord injury living in the community: lessons learned in terms of recruitment, attendance, learnability, and performance safety. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2017. Under Review.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
  • Huijgen BC, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Zampolini M, et al. Feasibility of a home-based telerehabilitation system compared to usual care: arm/hand function in patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury and multiple sclerosis. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14:249–256.
  • Martin Ginis KA, van der Scheer JW, Latimer-Cheung AE, et al. Evidence-based scientific exercise guidelines for adults with spinal cord injury: an update and a new guideline. Spinal Cord. 2017. Published online: 25 October 2017.
  • Lefeber N, Swinnen E, Kerckhofs E. The immediate effects of robot-assistance on energy consumption and cardiorespiratory load during walking compared to walking without robot-assistance: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:657–671.
  • Hicks AL, Martin Ginis KA, Pelletier CA, et al. The effects of exercise training on physical capacity, strength, body composition and functional performance among adults with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2011; 49:1103–1127.
  • Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Ginis KA, Latimer AE. Planning, leisure-time physical activity, and coping self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:2003–2011.
  • Sale P, Russo EF, Russo M, et al. Effects on mobility training and de-adaptations in subjects with spinal cord injury due to a Wearable Robot: a preliminary report. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:12.
  • Zeilig G, Weingarden H, Zwecker M, et al. Safety and tolerance of the ReWalk™ exoskeleton suit for ambulation by people with complete spinal cord injury: a pilot study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35:96–101.
  • Platz T, Gillner A, Borgwaldt N, et al. Device-training for individuals with thoracic and lumbar spinal cord injury using a powered exoskeleton for technically assisted mobility: achievements and user satisfaction. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8459018.
  • Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol. 1993;5:36–45.
  • Johnston P, Currie LM, Drynan D, et al. Getting it “right”: how collaborative relationships between people with disabilities and professionals can lead to the acquisition of needed assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9:421–431.
  • Sigrist R, Rauter G, Riener R, et al. Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: a review. Psychon Bull Rev. 2013;20:21–53.
  • Milia P, De Salvo F, Caserio M, et al. Neurorehabilitation in paraplegic patients with an active powered exoskeleton (Ekso). Digit Med. 2016;2:163–168.
  • Esquenazi A, Talaty M, Packel A, et al. The ReWalk powered exoskeleton to restore ambulatory function to individuals with thoracic-level motor-complete spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91:911–921.
  • Cranen K, Drossaert CH, Brinkman ES, et al. An exploration of chronic pain patients' perceptions of home telerehabilitation services. Health Expect. 2012;15:339–350.
  • He Y, Eguren D, Luu TP, et al. Risk management and regulations for lower limb medical exoskeletons: a review. Med Device. 2017;10:89–107.
  • Kalpakjian CZ, McCullumsmith CB, Fann JR, et al. Post-traumatic growth following spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2014;37:218–225.
  • Byra S. Posttraumatic growth in people with traumatic long-term spinal cord injury: predictive role of basic hope and coping. Spinal Cord. 2016;54:478–482.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.