End user evaluation of a Kneeling Wheelchair with “on the fly” adjustable seating functions

References

• Oyster ML, Karmarker AM, Patrick M, et al. Investigation of factors associated with manual wheelchair mobility in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:484–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprigle S, De l’aune W. Factors contributing to extended activity times during the provision of wheeled mobility devices. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8:225–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chaves ES, Bonniger ML, Cooper R, et al. Assessing the influence of wheelchair technology on perception of participation in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1854–1858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wee J, Lysaght R. Factors affecting measures of activities and participation in persons with mobility impairment. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:1633–1642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson D, Myklebust J. Wheelchair use and social integration. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2002;7:28–46.
   Google Scholar
• Smith EM, Sakakibara BM, Miller WC. A review of factors influencing participation in social and community activities for wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014; 11:361–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen AL, Brandt A, Samuelsson K, et al. Mobility devices to promote activity and participation: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:697–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell S. The quest for the perfect lightweight wheelchair: ultralight rigid frame wheelchair specification strategies for success. Rehab Manag. 2011;24:16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Liu HY, Cooper RA, Pearlman J, et al. Evaluation of titanium ultralight manual wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA standards. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:1251–1267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper RA. Wheelchair selection and configuration. New York (NY): Demos Medical Publishing; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper RA. A perspective on the ultralight wheelchair revolution. Technol Disabil. 1996;5:383–392.
   Google Scholar
• Gebrosky B, Pearlman J, Cooper RA, et al. Evaluation of lightweight wheelchairs using ANSI/RESNA testing standards. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50:1373–1391.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonenblum SE, Sprigle S. Wheelchair use in ultra-lightweight wheelchair users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:396–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragnarsson KT. Clinical perspectives on wheelchair selection–prescription considerations and a comparison of conventional and lightweight wheelchairs. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1990;8:8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers H, Berman S, Fails D, et al. A comparison of functional mobility in standard vs. ultralight wheelchairs as measured by performance on a community obstacle course. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:1083–1088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paralyzed Veterans of America Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Preservation of upper limb function following spinal cord injury: a clinical guideline for health-care professionals. J Spinal Cord Med. 2005;28:434–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonenblum SE, Sprigle SH, Martin JS. Everyday sitting behavior of full-time wheelchair users. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53:585–598.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonenblum SE, Sprigle S, Lopez RA. Manual wheelchair use: bouts of mobility in everyday life. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012; 2012:753165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borisoff JF, McPhail LT. The development of an ultralight wheelchair with dynamic seating. In: Proceedings of the RESNA 2011 Annual Conference; June 5–9; Toronto, ON: RESNA Press; 2011. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Mattie J, Borisoff J, Miller WC, et al. Characterizing the community use of an ultralight wheelchair with “on the fly” adjustable seating functions: a pilot study” . PLoS One. 2017;12:e0173662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas L, Borisoff JF, Sparrey C. Quantifying the effects of on-the-fly changes of seating configuration on the stability of a manual wheelchair. In: 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2017 July 11–15; Jeju Island, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Reenalda J, van Geffen P, Snoek G, et al. Effects of dynamic sitting interventions on tissue oxygenation in individuals with spinal cord disorders. Spinal Cord. 2010;48: 336–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane BA, Holm MB, Hobson D, et al. A dynamic seating intervention for wheelchair seating discomfort. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:988–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dicianno BE, Arva J, Lieberman JM, et al. RESNA position on the application of tilt, recline, and elevating legrests for wheelchairs. Assist Technol. 2009;21:13–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arva J, Paleg G, Lange M, et al. RESNA position on the application of wheelchair standing devices. Assist Technol. 2009;21:161–168. quiz 169-171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding D, Leister E, Cooper RA, et al. Usage of tilt-in-space, recline, and elevation seating functions in natural environment of wheelchair users. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45: 973–984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattie JL, Leland D, Borisoff JF. Development and pilot testing of a kneeling ultralight wheelchair design. In: Proceedings in the 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society; 2015 Aug 25–29; Milano, Italy: IEEE; p. 5024–5027.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders L, Stappers PJ. Convivial design toolbox: generative research for the front end of design. Amsterdam (NL): BIS Publishers; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin J, Chisnell D. Handbook of usability testing: how to plan, design and conduct effective tests. 2nd ed. Indianapolis (IN): Wiley Publishing, Inc.; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• DiGiovine MM, Cooper RA, Boninger ML, et al. User assessment of manual wheelchair ride comfort and ergonomics. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:490–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdios A, Sawatzky BJ, Sheel AW. Effects of camber on wheeling efficiency in the experienced and inexperienced wheelchair user. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44:459.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. The quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive devices (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technol Disabil. 2002;14: 101–105.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Smith C, McCreadie M, Unsworth J. Prescribing wheelchairs: the opinions of wheelchair users and their carers. Clin Rehabil. 1995;9:74–80.
   Google Scholar
• Arva J, Schmeler MR, Lange ML, et al. RESNA position on the application of seat-elevating devices for wheelchair users. Assist Technol. 2009;21:69–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Kirby RL, Smith C, et al. The manual wheelchair wheelie: a review of our current understanding of an important motor skill. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006;1:119–127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas L, Sparrey C, Borisoff J. Defining the stability limits of a manual wheelchair with adjustable seat and backrest. In: RESNA 2017 Annual Conference; 2017 June 26–30; New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Finley MA, McQuade KJ, Rodgers MM. Scapular kinematics during transfers in manual wheelchair users with and without shoulder impingement. Clin Biomech. 2005;20:32–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haubert LL, Mulroy SJ, Hatchett PE, et al. Car transfer and wheelchair loading techniques in independent drivers with paraplegia. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015;3:139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Backman CL, et al. Association between mobility, participation, and wheelchair‐related factors in long‐term care residents who use wheelchairs as their primary means of mobility. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012; 60:1310–1315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai CY, Hogaboom NS, Boninger ML, et al. The relationship between independent transfer skills and upper limb kinetics in wheelchair users. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:984526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fliess-Douer O, Vanlandewijck YC, Van Der Woude LHV. Most essential wheeled mobility skills for daily life: an international survey among paralympic wheelchair athletes with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:629–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alm M, Saraste H, Norrbrink C. Shoulder pain in persons with thoracic spinal cord injury: prevalence and characteristics. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:277–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawoczenski DA, Clobes SM, Gore SL, et al. Three-dimensional shoulder kinematics during a pressure relief technique and wheelchair transfer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1293–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyland J, Quigley P, Huang C, et al. Preserving transfer independence among individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2000;38:649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Drongelen S, van der Woude LH, Janssen TW, et al. Mechanical load on the upper extremity during wheelchair activities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1214–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen T, Van Oers C, Veeger H, et al. Relationship between physical strain during standardised ADL tasks and physical capacity in men with spinal cord injuries. Paraplegia. 1994;32:844–859.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gagnon D, Nadeau S, Noreau L, et al. Trunk and upper extremity kinematics during sitting pivot transfers performed by individuals with spinal cord injury. Clin Biomech. 2008;23:279–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines: dimensions of adult-sized wheelchairs. Available from: www.ada.gov/descript/reg3a/figA3ds.htm
   Google Scholar
• Mercer JL, Boninger M, Koontz A, et al. Shoulder joint kinetics and pathology in manual wheelchair users. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21:781–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boninger ML, Koontz AM, Sisto SA, et al. Pushrim biomechanics and injury prevention in spinal cord injury: recommendations based on CULP-SCI investigations. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42:9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füchtmeier B, May R, Hente R, et al. Proximal humerus fractures: a comparative biomechanical analysis of intra and extramedullary implants. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:441–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crytzer TM, Cooper R, Jerome G, et al. Identifying research needs for wheelchair transfers in the built environment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PDG Mobility. Wheelchairs for function and independence. Available from: http://www.pdgmobility.com
   Google Scholar
• Bodypoint. Bodypoint. Available from: http://www.bodypoint.com/ecommerce.
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Agudo A, Solís-Mozos M, Del-Ama AJ, et al. Comparative ergonomic assessment of manual wheelchairs by paraplegic users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8:305–313.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar