Advanced search
Publication Cover
Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology Volume 13, 2018 - Issue 5: Position Papers from the First Global Research, Innovation, and Education on Assistive Technology (GREAT) Summit
Submit an article Journal homepage
16,848
Views
84
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Assistive technology provision: towards an international framework for assuring availability and accessibility of affordable high-quality assistive technology

Luc de WitteSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; Correspondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-3013-2640
ORCID Icon,
Emily SteelTC Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Australia; ;School of Health and Wellbeing, The University of Southern Queensland, Ipswich, Australia; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-4124-3351
ORCID Icon,
Shivani GuptaDepartment of Health Ethics and Society, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-3300-6850
ORCID Icon,
Vinicius Delgado RamosFaculdade de Medicina da University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-4566-6637
ORCID Icon &
Uta RoentgenResearch Centre Technology in Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, the NetherlandsORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-3580-2332
ORCID Icon
Pages 467-472 | Received 05 Mar 2018, Accepted 24 Apr 2018, Published online: 09 May 2018

References

  • Andrich R, Mathiassen NE, Hoogerwerf EJ, et al. Service delivery systems for assistive technology in Europe: an AAATE/EASTIN position paper. Technol Disabil. 2013;25:127–146.
  • AAATE & EASTIN. Service delivery systems for assistive technology in Europe. Position paper, October 2012. Available from: https://aaate.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2016/02/ATServiceDelivery_PositionPaper.pdf.
  • World report on disability. World Health Organisation, Geneva, 2011. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70670/1/WHO_NMH_VIP_11.01_eng.pdf.
  • Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities. United Nations, New York, 2006.
  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nations, 1948. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/eng.pdf.
  • WHO&USAID. Joint paper on the provision of mobility devices in less resourced settings. World Health Organisation, Geneva, 2011.
  • Priority Assistive Products List. World Health Organisation, Geneva, 2016.
  • Gupta S, Meershoek A, Witte LP. d. Evaluating Support Service Policies using the Capability Approach in four Asian countries. Submitted, 2017.
  • The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2001. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/.
  • World Health Organisation disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/whodasii/en/.
  • Post MWM, Witte LP. d, Reichrath E, et al. Development and validation of impact-s, an ICF-based questionnaire to measure activities and participation. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:60–67.
  • Witte LP de, Knops H, Pyfers L, et al., editors. European service delivery systems in rehabilitation technology: HEART Line C. Hoensbroek, The Netherlands: iRv, Institute for Rehabilitation Research; 1994.
  • Steel EJ, Witte LP. d. Advances in European Assistive Technology service delivery and recommendations for further improvement. Technol Disabil. 2011;23:131–138.
  • Waldron D, Layton NA. Hard and soft assistive technologies: defining roles for clinicians. Aust Occ Ther J. 2008;55:61–64.
  • Cook AM, Polgar JM, editors. Cook and Hussey’s assistive technologies: principles and practice. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2008.
  • Elsaesser LJ, Bauer S. Provision of assistive technology services method (ATSM) according to evidence-based information and knowledge management. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:386–401. 2011.
  • Federici S, Scherer M. The assistive technology assessment process model and basic definitions. In: Federici S, Scherer M, editors. Assistive technology handbook. 2nd ed. section I. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2017. p. 1–12.
  • Federici S, Meloni F, Borsci S . The abandonment of assistive technology in Italy: a survey of National Health Service users. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;52:516–526.
  • Federici S, Meloni F, Borsci S. How much does abandonment of assistive technology cost Italy’s national health service? Atlas of Science, April 23, 2016.
  • Bauer S, Elsaesser LJ, Scherer M, et al. Promoting a standard for assistive technology service delivery. Technol Disabil. 2014;26:39–48.
  • Federici S, Scherer M, Borsci S. An ideal model of an assistive technology assessment and delivery process. Technol Disabil. 2014;26:27–38. doi:10.3233/TAD-140402.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.