Defining and evaluating transdisciplinary research: implications for aging and technology

References

• Sixsmith A. Technology and the challenge of aging. In: Sixsmith A, Gutman G, editors. Technologies for active aging. New York (NY): Springer; 2013. p. 7–25.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson P, Sixsmith J, Mihailidis A, et al., editors. Perspectives on collaboration in technology innovation for ageing. In: International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics; 2015. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sixsmith A, Mihailidis A, Simeonov D. Aging and technology: taking the research into the real world. Public Policy Aging Rep. 2017;27:74–78.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw J, Shaw S, Wherton J, et al. Studying scale-up and spread as social practice: theoretical introduction and empirical case study. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19:e244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boger J, Jackson P, Mulvenna M, et al. Principles for fostering the transdisciplinary development of assistive technologies. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12:480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, et al. Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: literature review and case study. Milbank Quart. 2016;94:392–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein JT. The transdisciplinary moment (um.). Integr Rev.2013;9:189–199.
   Google Scholar
• Klein JT. Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review. Am J Prevent Med. 2008;35:S116–S123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carew AL, Wickson F. The TD wheel: a heuristic to shape, support and evaluate transdisciplinary research. Futures. 2010;42:1146–1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk M. Transdisciplinary co-production: designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures. 2015;65:110–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfield PL. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35:1343–1357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polk M, Hadorn GH. Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Munich: Oekom; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn T, Bergmann M, Keil F. Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol Econ. 2012;79:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokols D, Hall KL, Voge AL. Transdisciplinary public health: definitions, core characteristics, and strategies for success. In: Haire-Joshu D, McBride TD, editors. Transdisciplinary public health: Research, methods, and practice. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass; 2013. p. 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Social Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Pham MT, Rajić A, Greig JD, et al. A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Syn Meth. 2014;5:371–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leischow SJ, Best A, Trochim WM, et al. Systems thinking to improve the public's health. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:S196–S203. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson BD, Fauchald SK. A transdisciplinary approach to developing a web-based nursing experiential log system for advanced practice nursing clinical experiences. computers, informatics. Nursing. 2011;29:630–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabry PL, Olster DH, Morgan GD, et al. Interdisciplinarity and systems science to improve population health: a view from the NIH Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:S211–S224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schensul SL, Nastasi BK, Verma RK. Community-based research in India: a case example of international and transdisciplinary collaboration. Am J Commun Psychol. 2006;38:125–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan KG, Clark PI, Huerta T. Transdisciplinarity among tobacco harm–reduction researchers a network analytic approach. Am J Prevent Med. 2008;35:S173–S181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masse LC, Moser RP, Stokols D, et al. Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:S151–S160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokols D, Harvey R, Gress J, et al. In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration Lessons learned and implications for active living research. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28:202–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long JC, Cunningham FC, Wiley J, et al. Leadership in complex networks: the importance of network position and strategic action in a translational cancer research network. Implement Sci. 2013;8:122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutman MA, Barker DC, Samples-Smart F, et al. Evaluation of active living research progress and lessons: in building a new field. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:S22–S33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Hong QN, Imbeau D, et al. The Work Disability Prevention CIHR Strategic Training Program: program performance after 5 years of implementation. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert RD, Monnier-Barbarino P. Transdisciplinary training in reproductive health through online multidisciplinary problem-solving: a proof of concept. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;123:82–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall KL, Stokols D, Stipelman BA, et al. Assessing the value of team science: a study comparing center- and investigator-initiated grants. Am J Prev Med. 2012;42:157–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall KL, Stokols D, Moser RP, et al. The collaboration readiness of transdisciplinary research teams and centers findings from the National Cancer Institute's TREC Year-One evaluation study. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35:S161–S172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daudelin G, Lehoux P, Abelson J, et al. The integration of citizens into a science/policy network in genetics: governance arrangements and asymmetry in expertise. Health Expect. 2011;14:261–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper GW, Neubauer LC, Bangi AK, et al. Transdisciplinary research and evaluation for community health initiatives. Health Promot Pract. 2008;9:328–337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snow ME, Salmon A, Young R. Teaching transdisciplinarity in a discipline-centred world. CELT. 2011;3:159–165.
   Google Scholar
• Simard M, Gagne AM, Lambert RD, et al. A transdisciplinary approach to the decision-making process in extreme prematurity. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:450.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Orozco F, Cole DC. Development of transdisciplinarity among students placed with a sustainability for health research project. EcoHealth 2008;5:491–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kneipp SM, Gilleskie D, Sheely A, et al. Nurse scientists overcoming challenges to lead transdisciplinary research teams. Nurs. Outlook 2014;62:352–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier D. Food and nutrition policy: a biological anthropologist's experiences from an academic platform. Am J Hum Biol. 2015;27:16–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reme SE, Caban-Martinez AJ, Young J, et al. A model for development and delivery of a graduate course in transdisciplinary research. Public Health Rep. 2015;130:552–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden SH, Purnell T, Halbert JP, et al. A community-engaged cardiovascular health disparities research training curriculum: implementation and preliminary outcomes. Acad Med. 2014;89:1348–1356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottoson JM, Green LW, Beery WL, et al. Policy-contribution assessment and field-building analysis of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Active Living Research Program. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36:S34–S43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang M, Burley T, Grigorovich A, et al. AGE-WELL Innovation Workshops: A Transdisciplinary Approach to ‘Thinking Commercially’. Toronto, ON: AGE-WELL NCE, University of Toronto; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wada M, Grigorovich A, Fang M-L, et al. Facilitators and barriers to transdisciplinary working in aging and technology research: An exploration of experiences in a pan-Canadian research network. Winnipeg, MB: Canadian Association on Gerontology Annual Conference; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sebastianski M, Juzwishin D, Wolfaardt U, et al. Innovation and commercialization in public health care systems: a review of challenges and opportunities in Canada. Innov Entrepreneurship Health 2015;2:69–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber S. Doing interdisciplinary mixed methods health care research: Working the boundaries, tensions, and synergistic potential of team-based research. Qual Health Res. 2016;26:649–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar