Do powered over-ground lower limb robotic exoskeletons affect outcomes in the rehabilitation of people with acquired brain injury?

References

• Whyte E, Skidmore E, Aizenstein H. Cognitive impairment in acquired brain injury: a predictor of rehabilitation outcomes and an opportunity for novel interventions. PMR. 2011;3:S45–S51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• States RA, Salem Y, Pappas E. Overground gait training for individuals with chronic stroke: a Cochrane systematic review. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009;33:179–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:27–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• (Australian) Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Management 2017 – Chapter 5 of 8: Rehabilitation [Internet]. Melbourne (VIC). Stroke Foundation; 2017 Dec 8 [cited 2018 Jan 23]. Available from: htttps://www.magicapp.org/app#guideline/2146/section/25236
   Google Scholar
• Wall A, Borg J, Palmcrantz S. Clinical application of the hybrid assistive limb (HAL) for gait training – a systematic review. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015;9:48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley CP, Childress J, Boake C, et al. Over-ground and robotic-assisted locomotor training in adults with chronic stroke: a blinded randomized clinical trial. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8:161–168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swinnen E, Beckwée D, Meeusen R, et al. Does robot-assisted gait rehabilitation improve balance in stroke patients? A systematic review Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;21:87–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho DY, Park SW, Lee MJ, et al. Effects of robot-assisted gait training on the balance and gait of chronic stroke patients: focus on dependent ambulators. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27:3053–3057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiart L, Rosychuk RJ, Wright FV. Evaluation of the effectiveness of robotic gait training and gait-focused physical therapy programs for children and youth with cerebral palsy: a mixed methods RCT. BMC Neurol. 2016;16:86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey LA. Physiotherapy rehabilitation for people with spinal cord injuries. J Physiother. 2016;62:4–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buesing C, Fisch G, O’Donnell M, et al. Effects of wearable exoskeleton stride management assist system (SMA) on spatiotemporal gait characteristics in individuals after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2015;12:101–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spectrum. [Internet]. IEEE Spectrum; [cited 2017 May 15]. Available from: http://spectrum.ieee.org/the-human-os/biomedical/bionics/paraplegic-man-walks-in-ekso-robotic-exoskeleton-to-demo-its-killer-app.
   Google Scholar
• AlterG. [Internet]. [cited 2017 Oct 11]. Available from: http://www.alterg.com/products/bionic-leg/professional-physical-therapy
   Google Scholar
• Bortole M, Venkatakrishnan A, Zhu F, et al. The H2 robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation after stroke: early findings from a clinical study. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2015;12:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esquenazi A, Talaty M, Jayaraman A. Powered exoskeletons for walking assistance in persons with central nervous system injuries: a narrative review. PMR. 2017;9:46–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• REX Bionics. [Internet]. Melbourne: Rex Bionics LTD; [cited 2017 May 20]. Available from: http://www.rexbionics.com/rex-for-clinical-use/.
   Google Scholar
• Esquenazi A, Talaty M, Packel A, et al. The ReWalk powered exoskeleton to restore ambulatory function to individuals with thoracic-level motor-complete spinal cord injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91:911–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8:336–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs SH, Black N. Feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baschung Pfister P, de Bruin ED, Tobler-Ammann BC, et al. The relevance of applying exercise training principles when designing therapeutic interventions for patients with inflammatory myopathies: a systematic review. Rheumatol Int. 2015;35:1641–1654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council. [Internet]. Australia; Commonwealth of Australia 2017; [cited 2017 Jun 01]. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/information-guideline-developers/resources-guideline-developers.
   Google Scholar
• Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. Chapter 12: interpreting results and drawing conclusions. In: Julian P.T. Higgins and Sally Green, Editor. Cochrane handbook;.Hoboken, US: John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2017. p. 12.1–12.21.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0. Hoboken, US: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor SR, Tully MA, Ryan B, et al. Failure of a numerical quality assessment scale to identify potential risk of bias in a systematic review: a comparison study. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein J, Bishop L, Stein DJ, et al. Gait training with a robotic leg brace after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93:987–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe H, Goto R, Tanaka N, et al. Effects of gait training using the Hybrid Assistive Limb in recovery-phase stroke patients: a 2-month follow-up, randomised controlled study. NRE. 2017;40:363–367.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshimoto T, Shimizu I, Hiroi Y, et al. Feasibility and efficacy of high-speed gait training with a voluntary driven exoskeleton robot for gait and balance dysfunction in patients with chronic stroke: non-randomised pilot study with concurrent control. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015;38:338–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogata T, Abe H, Samura K, et al. Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) Rehabilitation in patients with acute hemorrhagic stroke. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015;55:901–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa K, Mizukami M, Kawamoto H, et al. Gait training with Hybrid Assistive Limb enhances the gait functions in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2017;40:87–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubota S, Nakata Y, Eguchi K, et al. Feasibility of rehabilitation training with a newly developed wearable robot for patients with limited mobility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1080–1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueba T, Hamada O, Ogata T, et al. Feasibility and safety of acute phase rehabilitation after stroke using the Hybrid Assistive Limb robot suit. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2013;53:287–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Kwakkel G, et al. Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce. Int J Stroke. 2017;12:444–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Ding L, Chen N, et al. Improved walking ability with wearable robot-assisted training in patients suffering chronic stroke. BME. 2015;26:S329–S340.
   Google Scholar
• Byl NN. Mobility training using a bionic knee orthosis in patients in a post-stroke chronic state: a case series. J Med Case Reports. 2012;6:1–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wong K, Bishop L, Stein J. A wearable robotic knee orthosis for gait training: a case-series of hemiparetic stroke survivors. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2012;36:113–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto H, Kamibayashi K, Nakata Y, et al. Pilot Study of locomotion improvement using hybrid assistive limb in chronic stroke patients. BMC Neurol. 2013;13:141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon CJ, Knight T, Binns E, et al. Clinical measures of balance in people with type two diabetes: a systematic literature review. Gait Posture. 2017;58:325–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoghue D, Stokes EK, Murphy A, et al. How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the Berg Balance Scale in elderly people. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:343–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morone G, Iosa M, Bragoni M, et al. Who may have durable benefit from robotic gait training? A 2-year follow-up randomized controlled trial in patients with subacute stroke. Stroke. 2012;43:1140–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinicaltrials.gov [Internet], United States; US National Library of Medicine [cited 2018 Jul 03]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02943915
   Google Scholar
• Holanda LJ, Silva PMM, Amorim TC, et al. Robotic assisted gait as a tool for rehabilitation of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14:126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson I, Hart K, Tussler D, et al. Lower-limb exoskeletons for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: findings from a feasibility study. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30:73–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar