Use of single-subject research designs in seating and wheeled mobility research: a scoping review

References

• Cohen L, Greer N, Berliner E, et al. mobilityRERC state of the science conference: considerations for developing an evidence base for wheeled mobility and seating service delivery. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8:462–471.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, MW. Current population reports. Americans With Disabilities 2010: Household Economic studies. [US Department of Commerce website]. July 2012. Available at: https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/2012/demo/p70-131.pdf. [Accessed May 17, 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Smith EM, Giesbrecht EM, Mortenson WB, et al. Prevalence of wheelchair and scooter use among community-dwelling Canadians. Phys Ther. 2016;96:1135–1142.
   Google Scholar
• Damiano D. Meaningfulness of mean group results for determining the optimal motor rehabilitation program for an individual child with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56:1141–1146.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom M, Fischer J, Orme JG. Evaluating practice: guidelines for the accountable professional. 6th ed. Boston (MA): Allyn and Bacon; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett SD, Heinemann AW, Libin A, et al. Small N designs for rehabilitation research. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49:175–186.
   Google Scholar
• Sprigle S. Research priorities: seating and positioning. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:181–187.
   Google Scholar
• Hoenig H, Giacobbi P, Levy CE. Methodological challenges confronting researchers of wheeled mobility aids and other assistive technologies. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:159–681.
   Google Scholar
• Graham JE, Karmarkar AM, Ottenbacher KJ. Small sample research designs for evidence-based rehabilitation: issues and methods. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:S111–S116.
   Google Scholar
• Romeiser‐Logan L, Slaughter R, et al. Single‐subject research designs in pediatric rehabilitation: a valuable step towards knowledge translation. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59:574–580.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall Publishers; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Romeiser Logan L, Hickman RR, Harris SR, et al. Single-subject research design: recommendations for levels of evidence and quality rating. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:99–103.
   Google Scholar
• Tate RL, Perdices P, Rosenkoetter U, et al. The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017;27:1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Connell PJ, Thompson CK. Flexibility of single-subject experimental designs. Part III: using flexibility to design or modify experiments. J Speech Hear Disord. 1986;51:214–225.
   Google Scholar
• Backman CL, Harris SR, Chisholm JA, et al. Single-subject research in rehabilitation: a review of studies using AB, withdrawal, multiple baseline, and alternating treatments designs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:1145–1153.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, et al. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Chen-Wing SLN, Schuller R, Fernie GR. An interface to enhance mobility for people with hemispatial neglect. Assist Technol. 1997;9:55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Costigan FA, Light J. Effect of seated position on upper-extremity access to augmentative communication for children with cerebral palsy: preliminary investigation. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64:596–604.
   Google Scholar
• Crane B, Hobson D, Stadelmeier S. Development and testing of an innovative user-adjustable support surface for wheelchair seating discomfort. Assist Technol. 2010;22:152–162.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson J, Thornton H. Can patients with unilateral neglect following stroke drive electrically powered wheelchairs? Br J Occup Ther. 2003;66:496–504.
   Google Scholar
• Deitz J, Swinth Y, White O. Powered mobility and preschoolers with complex developmental delays. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56:86–96.
   Google Scholar
• Lephart K, Kaplan SL. Two seating systems’ effects on an adolescent with cerebral palsy and severe scoliosis. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2015;27:258–266.
   Google Scholar
• Logan SW, Huang H, Stahlin K, et al. Modified ride-on car for mobility and socialization: single-case study of an infant with Down syndrome. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014;26:418–426.
   Google Scholar
• Logan SW, Feldner HA, Galloway JC, et al. Modified ride-on car use by children with complex medical needs. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2016;28:100–107.
   Google Scholar
• Pomeroy VM, Mickelborough J, Hill E, et al. A hypothesis: self-propulsion in a wheelchair early after stroke might not be harmful. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:174–180.
   Google Scholar
• Reid DT. The effects of the saddle seat on seated postural control and upper-extremity movement in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996;38:805–815.
   Google Scholar
• Reid D, Rigby P, Ryan S. Functional impact of a rigid pelvic stabilizer on children with cerebral palsy who use wheelchairs: users’ and caregivers’ perceptions. Pediatr Rehabil. 1999;3:101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Rigby P, Reid D, Schoger S, et al. Effects of a wheelchair-mounted rigid pelvic stabilizer on caregiver assistance for children with cerebral palsy. Assist Technol. 2001;13:2–11.
   Google Scholar
• Trewartha M, Stiller K. Comparison of the pressure redistribution qualities of two air-filled wheelchair cushions for people with spinal cord injuries. Aust Occup Ther J. 2011;58:287–292.
   Google Scholar
• Washington K, Deitz JC, White OR, et al. The effects of a contoured foam seat on postural alignment and upper-extremity function in infants with neuromotor impairments. Phys Ther. 2002;82:1064–1076.
   Google Scholar
• Yuen HK, Garret D. Comparison of three wheelchair cushions for effectiveness of pressure relief. Am J Occup Ther. 2001;55:470–475.
   Google Scholar
• Meiser MJ, McEwen IR. Lightweight and ultralight wheelchairs: propulsion and preferences of two young children with spina bifida. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2007;19:245–253.
   Google Scholar
• Kenyon LK, Farris J, Aldrich N, Rhodes S. Does power mobility training impact a child’s mastery motivation and spectrum of EEG activity? An exploratory project. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:665–673.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhite CS, Field WE, Jaramillo M. Tractor seating for operators with paraplegia. Assist Technol. 2017;29:37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshihiro N, Ito E. Effect of passive limb activation by functional electrical stimulation on wheelchair driving in patients with unilateral spatial neglect: a case study. Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2017;30:14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Franks CA, Palisano RJ, Darbee JC. The effect of walking with an assistive device and using a wheelchair on school performance in students with myelomeningocele. Phys Ther. 1991;71:570–577.
   Google Scholar
• Watson PJ, Workman EA. The non-concurrent multiple baseline across-individuals design: an extension of the traditional multiple baseline design. J Behav Ther Exp Psych. 1981;12:257–259.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill TR, Levin JR. Enhancing the scientific credibility of single-case intervention research: Randomization to the rescue. Psychol Methods. 2010;15:124–144.
   Google Scholar
• Wolery M. Procedural fidelity: a reminder of its functions. J Behav Educ. 1994;4:381–386.
   Google Scholar
• Di Rezze B, Law M, Eva K, et al. Development of a generic fidelity measure for rehabilitation intervention research for children with physical disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:737–744.
   Google Scholar
• Ledford JR, Gast DL. Measuring procedural fidelity in behavioural research. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24:332–348.
   Google Scholar
• Nourbakhsh MR, Ottenbacher KJ. The statistical analysis of single-subject data: a comparative examination. Phys Ther. 1994;74:768–776. Aug
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach C, Schudrich WZ. SSD for R: a comprehensive statistical package to analyze single-system data. Res Soc Work Pract. 2013;23:346–353.
   Google Scholar