672
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

User satisfaction with lower limb wearable robotic exoskeletons

, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 322-327 | Received 24 May 2018, Accepted 10 Dec 2018, Published online: 20 Feb 2019

References

  • Kozlowski AJ, Fabian M, Lad D, et al. Feasibility and safety of a powered exoskeleton for assisted walking for persons with multiple sclerosis: a single-group preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:1300–1307.
  • Platz T, Gillner A, Borgwaldt N, et al. Device-training for individuals with thoracic and lumbar spinal cord injury using a powered exoskeleton for technically assisted mobility: achievements and user satisfaction. BioMed Res Int. 2016;2016:1.
  • Raab K, Krakow K, Tripp F, et al. Effects of training with the ReWalk exoskeleton on quality of life in incomplete spinal cord injury: a single case study. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2016;2:15025.
  • Zeilig G, Weingarden H, Zwecker M, et al. Safety and tolerance of the ReWalk exoskeleton suit for ambulation by people with complete spinal cord injury: a pilot study. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35:96–101.
  • Koumpouros Y. A systematic review on existing measures for the subjective assessment of rehabilitation and assistive robot devices. J Healthc Eng. 2016;2016:1.
  • Contreras-Vidal JL, Bhagat NA, Brantley J, et al. Powered exoskeletons for bipedal locomotion after spinal cord injury. J Neural Eng. 2016;13:031001.
  • Gagnon DH, Vermette M, Duclos C, et al. Satisfaction and perceptions of long-term manual wheelchair users with a spinal cord injury upon completion of a locomotor training program with an overground robotic exoskeleton. Disability Rehabil: Assist Technol. 2017. Advance online publication.
  • Birch N, Graham J, Priestley T, et al. Results of the first interim analysis of the RAPPER II trial in patients with spinal cord injury: ambulation and functional exercise programs in the REX powered walking aid. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017;14:60.
  • Lajeunesse V, Vincent C, Routhier F, et al. Exoskeletons’ design and usefulness evidence according to a systematic review of lower limb exoskeletons used for functional mobility by people with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol. 2016;11:535–547.
  • Lajeunesse V, Routhier F, Vincent C, et al. Perspectives of individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury concerning the usability of lower limb exoskeletons: an exploratory study. Technol Disabil. 2018;30:63–76.
  • Benson I, Hart K, Tussler D, et al. Lower-limb exoskeletons for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: findings from a feasibility study. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30:73–84.
  • del-Ama AJ, Gil-Agudo A, Bravo-Esteban E, et al. Hybrid therapy of walking with Kinesis overground robot for persons with incomplete spinal cord injury: a feasibility study. Robotics Autonomous Syst. 2015;73:44–58.
  • Wolff J, Parker C, Borisoff J, et al. A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:169–178.
  • Fritz H, Patzer D, Galen SS. Robotic exoskeletons for reengaging in everyday activities: promises, pitfalls, and opportunities. Disability Rehabil. 2017;1. Advance online publication.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.