The influence of operator and wheelchair factors on wheelchair propulsion effort

References

• van der Woude LH, Hendrich KM, Veeger HE. Manual wheelchair propulsion: effects of power output on physiology and technique. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988;20:70–78.
   Google Scholar
• van der Woude LH, van Kranen E, Ariens G, et al. Physical strain and mechanical efficiency in hubcrank and handrim wheelchair propulsion. J Med Eng Technol. 1995;19:123–131.
   Google Scholar
• Boninger ML, Dicianno BE, Cooper RA, et al. Shoulder magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities, wheelchair propulsion, and gender. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:1615–1620.
   Google Scholar
• Frank TG, Abel EW. Measurement of the turning, rolling and obstacle resistance of wheelchair castor wheels. J Biomed Eng. 1989;11:462–466.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon J, Kauzlarich JJ, Thacker JG. Tests of two new polyurethane foam wheelchair tires. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1989;26:33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan RE, Nash MS, Collinger JL, et al. Impact of surface type, wheelchair weight, and axle position on wheelchair propulsion by novice older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1076–1083.
   Google Scholar
• Kotajarvi BR, Sabick MB, An KN, et al. The effect of seat position on wheelchair propulsion biomechanics. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41:403–414.
   Google Scholar
• Boninger ML, Baldwin M, Cooper RA, et al. Manual wheelchair pushrim biomechanics and axle position. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:608–613.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker CE. Wheelchair prescription: an analysis of factors that affect mobility and performance. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1986;23:19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Caspall JJ, Seligsohn E, Dao PV, et al. Changes in inertia and effect on turning effort across different wheelchair configurations. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50:1353–1362.
   Google Scholar
• Lin JT, Huang M, Sprigle S. Evaluation of wheelchair resistive forces during straight and turning trajectories across different wheelchair configurations using a free-wheeling coast-down test. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52:763–774.
   Google Scholar
• Sprigle S, Huang M. Impact of mass and weight distribution on manual wheelchair propulsion torque. Assist Technol. 2015;27:226–235.
   Google Scholar
• Davis GM, Kofsky PR, Kelsey JC, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness and muscular strength of wheelchair users. Can Med Assoc J. 1981;125:1317–1323.
   Google Scholar
• Anneken V, Hanssen-Doose A, Hirschfeld S, et al. Influence of physical exercise on quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:393–399.
   Google Scholar
• Kofsky PR, Shephard RJ, Davis GM, et al. Muscle strength and aerobic power–a study of lower-limb disabled males. Int Rehabil Med. 1985;7:151–155.
   Google Scholar
• Zoeller RF, Riechman SE, Dabayebeh IM, et al. Relation between muscular strength and cardiorespiratory fitness in people with thoracic-level paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1441–1446.
   Google Scholar
• Gorce P, Louis N. Wheelchair propulsion kinematics in beginners and expert users: influence of wheelchair settings. Clin Biomech. 2012;27:7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Mâsse LC, Lamontagne M, O'Riain MD. Biomechanical analysis of wheelchair propulsion for various seating positions. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1992;29:12–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sonenblum SE, Sprigle S, Lopez RA. Manual wheelchair use: bouts of mobility in everyday life. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:753165.
   Google Scholar
• Sprigle S. On "impact of surface type, wheelchair weight, and axle position on wheelchair propulsion by novice older adults". Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1073–1075.
   Google Scholar
• RESNA. RESNA position on the application of ultralight manual wheelchairs. Arlington: Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology Society of North America; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Medola FO, Dao PV, Caspall JJ, et al. Partitioning kinetic energy during freewheeling wheelchair maneuvers. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014;22:326–333.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. Wheelchairs - Part 13: Determination of coefficient of friction of test surfaces. ISO. 1989; 7176:13
   Google Scholar
• Byrne NM, Hills AP, Hunter GR, et al. Metabolic equivalent: one size does not fit all. J Appl Physiol. 2005;99:1112–1119.
   Google Scholar
• Tahamont M, Knowlton RG, Sawka MN, et al. Metabolic responses of women to exercise attributable to long term use of a manual wheelchair. Paraplegia. 1986;24:311–317.
   Google Scholar
• Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Paulson TA, Tolfrey K, et al. Prediction of peak oxygen uptake from differentiated ratings of perceived exertion during wheelchair propulsion in trained wheelchair sportspersons. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014;114:1251–1258.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Rahamneh HQ, Faulkner JA, Byrne C, et al. Prediction of peak oxygen uptake from ratings of perceived exertion during arm exercise in able-bodied and persons with poliomyelitis. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:131–135.
   Google Scholar
• Conger SA, Bassett DR. A compendium of energy costs of physical activities for individuals who use manual wheelchairs. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2011;28:310–325.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb SC, James CR, Hjertstedt M, et al. A digital photographic measurement method for quantifying foot posture: validity, reliability, and descriptive data. J Athl Train. 2011;46:20–30.
   Google Scholar
• van Niekerk SM, Louw Q, Vaughan C, et al. Photographic measurement of upper-body sitting posture of high school students: a reliability and validity study. Bmc Musculoskel Dis. 2008;20:113.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9:671–675.
   Google Scholar
• Eicholtz MR, Caspall JJ, Dao PV, et al. Test method for empirically determining inertial properties of manual wheelchairs. Jrrd. 2012;49:51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen TW, van Oers CA, Hollander AP, et al. Isometric strength, sprint power, and aerobic power in individuals with a spinal cord injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;25:863–870.
   Google Scholar
• Groot S, Scheer JWvd, Windt JAvd, et al. Hand rim wheelchair training: effects of intensity and duration on physical capacity. Health. 2013;05:8.
   Google Scholar
• Sun GW, Shook TL, Kay GL. Inappropriate use of bivariable analysis to screen risk factors for use in multivariable analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:907–916.
   Google Scholar
• Kauzlarich J, Thacker JG. Wheelchair tire rolling resistance and fatigue. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1985;22:25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Sauret C, Bascou J, de Saint Rémy N, et al. Assessment of field rolling resistance of manual wheelchairs. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49:63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Lenton JP, Fowler NE, van der Woude L, et al. Wheelchair propulsion: effects of experience and push strategy on efficiency and perceived exertion. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008;33:870–879.
   Google Scholar
• Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Kirk JH. Effect of push frequency and strategy variations on economy and perceived exertion during wheelchair propulsion. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;90:154–158.
   Google Scholar