A motor learning therapeutic intervention for a child with cerebral palsy through a social assistive robot

References

• Bax M, Goldstein M, Rosenbaum P, Executive Committee for the Definition of Cerebral Palsy, et al. Proposed definition and classification of cerebral palsy, April 2005. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47:571–576.
   Google Scholar
• Bayón C, Ramírez O, Serrano JI, et al. Development and evaluation of a novel robotic platform for gait rehabilitation in patients with cerebral palsy: CPwalker. Robotics Autonom Syst. 2017;91:101–113.
   Google Scholar
• Howard AM. Robots learn to play: robots emerging role in pediatric therapy. Proc Twenty-Sixth Int Florida Artif Intel Res Soc Conf. 2013;22(3):117–126. doi:10.3233/TAD-2010-0296
   Google Scholar
• Calderita LV, Bustos P, Suárez Mejías C, et al. THERAPIST: towards an autonomous socially interactive robot for motor and neurorehabilitation therapies for children. 7th Int Conf Perv Comput Technol Healthcare Workshops. 2013;1:374–377.
   Google Scholar
• Winstein C, Lewthwaite R, Blanton SR, et al. Infusing motor learning research into neurorehabilitation practice: a historical perspective with case exemplar from the accelerated skill acquisition program. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2014;38:190–200.
   Google Scholar
• Cook A, Encarnaço P, Adams K. Robots: assistive technologies for play, learning and cognitive development. Technol Disabil. 2010;22:127–145.
   Google Scholar
• Poletz L, Encarnação P, Adams K, et al. Robot skills and cognitive performance of preschool children. Technology and Disability. 2010;1:117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Riener R, Frey M, Bernhardt M, et al. Human-centered rehabilitation robotics. 9th Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2005. 2005;319–322. doi:10.1109/ICORR.2005.1501110.
   Google Scholar
• Feil-seifer D, Matari MJ. Defining socially assistive robotics. In 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. 2005;465–468.
   Google Scholar
• Tapus A, Maja M, Scassellatti B. The grand challenges in socially assistive robotics. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2013;14 (1):35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Plaisant C, Druin A, Lathan C, et al. A storytelling robot for pediatric rehabilitation. Proc Fourth Int ACM Conf Assist Technol - Assets ’00. 2000;50–55. New York: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/354324.354338
   Google Scholar
• Fridin M. Storytelling by a kindergarten social assistive robot: a tool for constructive learning in preschool education. Comput Educ. 2014;70:53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Keren G, Ben-David A, Fridin M. Kindergarten assistive robotics (KAR) as a tool for spatial cognition development in pre - school education. 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. October 7–12. 2012;1084–1089.
   Google Scholar
• Yussof H, Ismail LI, Shamsuddin S, et al. Human-robot interaction intervention therapy procedure for initial response of autism children with humanoid robot. 1st Joint International Symposium on System-Integrated Intelligence 2012: New Challenges for Product and Production Engineering. 2012;148–150.
   Google Scholar
• Fujimoto I, Matsumoto TS, De Silva PR, et al. Study on an assistive robot for improving imitation skill of children with autism. In: Ge S.S., Li H., Cabibihan JJ., Tan Y.K. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6414. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2010;232–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17248-9_24
   Google Scholar
• Shamsuddin S, Yussof H, Ismail LI, et al. Humanoid robot NAO interacting with autistic children of moderately impaired intelligence to augment communication skills. Procedia Eng. 2012;41:1533–1538.
   Google Scholar
• THERAPIST. THERAPIST An autonomous and socially interactive robot for motor and neurorehabilitation therapies. 2013. Retrieved May 30, 2015, from http://www.therapist.uma.es/
   Google Scholar
• González JC, Pulido JC, Fernández F, et al. Planning, execution and monitoring of physical rehabilitation therapies with a robotic architecture. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;210:339–343. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25991162
   Google Scholar
• Martín A, González JC, Pulido JC, et al. Therapy monitoring and patient evaluation with social robots. In Proceedings of the 3rd 2015 Workshop on ICTs for improving Patients Rehabilitation Research Techniques - REHAB ’15 (pp. 152–155). New York: ACM Press. 2015;1–4. doi:10.1145/2838944.2838981
   Google Scholar
• Fridin M, Belokopytov M. Robotics agent coacher for CP motor function (RAC CP Fun). Robotica. 2014;32:1265–1279.
   Google Scholar
• Malik NA, Yussof H, Hanapiah FA, et al. Human robot interaction (HRI) between a humanoid robot and children with cerebral palsy: experimental framework and measure of engagement. IECBES 2014, Conference Proceedings - 2014 IEEE Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Sciences: “Miri, Where Engineering in Medicine and Biology and Humanity Meet,” 2014;430–435.
   Google Scholar
• Malik NA, Yussof H, Hanapiah FA. Development of imitation learning through physical therapy using a humanoid robot. Procedia Comput Sci. 2014;42:191–197.
   Google Scholar
• Shamsuddin S, Mara UT. Telerehabilitation in robotic assistive therapy for children with developmental disabilities. In 2014 IEEE REGION 10 SYMPOSIUM (pp. 370–375). IEEE. 2014;370–375. doi:10.1109/TENCONSpring.2014.6863060
   Google Scholar
• Rahman RAA, Hanapiah FA, Basri HH, et al. Use of humanoid robot in children with cerebral palsy: the ups and downs in clinical experience. Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;76:394–399.
   Google Scholar
• Malik NA, Yussof H, Hanapiah FA, et al. Human-robot interaction for children with cerebral palsy: reflection and suggestion for interactive scenario design. Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;76:388–393.
   Google Scholar
• Bayon C, Raya R. Robotic therapies for children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Trans Biomed. 2016;7:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hidecker MJC, Ho NT, Dodge N, et al. Inter-relationships of functional status in cerebral palsy: Analyzing gross motor function, manual ability, and communication function classification systems in children. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54:737–742.
   Google Scholar
• Bovend’Eerdt TJH, Botell RE, Wade DT. Writing SMART rehabilitation goals and achieving goal attainment scaling: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:352–361.
   Google Scholar
• King G. a, Palisano RJ, Tucker MA. Goal attainment scaling: its use in evaluating. pediatric therapy programs. Phys Occup Ther Pediatrics. 1999;19:31–52.
   Google Scholar
• Mailloux Z, May-benson TA, Summers CA, et al. Goal attainment scaling as a measure of meaningful outcomes for children with sensory integration disorders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 2007;61:254–259. doi:10.5014/ajot.61.2.254
   Google Scholar
• SoftBank Robotics. (2014). NAO the humanoid robot | SoftBank Robotics. Retrieved November 8, 2018, from https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/nao
   Google Scholar
• Novak I, Mcintyre S, Morgan C, et al. A systematic review of interventions for children with cerebral palsy: State of the evidence. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:885–910.
   Google Scholar
• Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, Molero-Sánchez A, Carratalá-Tejada M, et al. Theories and control models and motor learning: clinical applications in neurorehabilitation. Neurología (English Edition). 2015;30:32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Miller L, Ziviani J, Ware RS, et al. Mastery motivation: a way of understanding therapy outcomes for children with unilateral cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1439–1445.
   Google Scholar
• Burdea GC, Cioi D, Kale A, et al. Robotics and gaming to improve ankle strength, motor control, and function in children with cerebral palsy—a case study series. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013;21:165–173.
   Google Scholar
• Buitrago JA, Caicedo Bravo EF. Defining therapeutic scenarios using robots for children with cerebral palsy. Biosyst Biorobotics. 2017;15:1475–1479.
   Google Scholar