Transtibial amputee gait with the unity suspension system

References

• Gholizadeh H, Osman NA, Eshraghi A, et al. Transtibial prosthesis suspension systems: systematic review of literature. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014;29:87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Baars ECT, Geertzen JHB. Literature review of the possible advantages of silicon liner socket use in trans-tibial prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2005;29:27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Board WJ, Street GM, Caspers C. A comparison of trans‐tibial amputee suction and vacuum socket conditions. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2001;25:202–209.
   Google Scholar
• Czerniecki JM, Gitter AJ. Gait analysis in the amputee: has it helped the amputee or contributed to the development of improved prosthetic components? Gait Posture. 1996;4:258–268.
   Google Scholar
• Gholizadeh H, Lemaire ED, Eshraghi A. The evidence-base for elevated vacuum in lower limb prosthetics: literature review and professional feedback. Clin Biomech. 2016;37:108–116.
   Google Scholar
• Hafner BJ, Cagle JC, Allyn KJ, et al. Elastomeric liners for people with transtibial amputation: survey of prosthetists’ clinical practices. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016;41:149–56. doi:10.1177/0309364616661256
   Google Scholar
• Samitier CB, Guirao L, Costea M, et al. The benefits of using a vacuum-assisted socket system to improve balance and gait in elderly transtibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016;40:83–88.
   Google Scholar
• Beil TL, Street GM, Covey SJ. Interface pressures during ambulation using suction and vacuum-assisted prosthetic sockets. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;39:693.
   Google Scholar
• Brunelli S, Delussu AS, Paradisi F, et al. A comparison between the suction suspension system and the hypobaric Iceross Seal-In® X5 in transtibial amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2013;37:436–44. doi:10.1177/0309364613476531
   Google Scholar
• Gholizadeh H, Osman NAA, Eshraghi A, et al. Transfemoral prosthesis suspension systems. A systematic review of the literature. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;93:809–823.
   Google Scholar
• Klute GK, Berge JS, Biggs W, et al. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:1570–1575.
   Google Scholar
• Papaioannou G, Mitrogiannis C, Nianios G, et al. Assessment of amputee socket–stump–residual bone kinematics during strenuous activities using Dynamic Roentgen Stereogrammetric Analysis. J Biomech. 2010;43:871–878.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton E, Hoskins R, Fosnight T. Using elevated vacuum to improve functional outcomes: a case report. J Prosthet Orthot. 2011;23:184–189.
   Google Scholar
• Traballesi M, Delussu AS, Fusco A, et al. Residual limb wounds or ulcers heal in transtibial amputees using an active suction socket system. A randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;48:613–623.
   Google Scholar
• Caspers CA. Hypobarically-controlled artificial limb for amputees. Google Patents. Hypobarically-Controlled Artificial Limb for Amputees. 1996;(U.S. Patent 5,549,709.).
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira AEK, Neves EB. A comparison of vacuum and KBM prosthetic fitting for unilateral transtibial amputees using the Gait Profile Score. Gait Posture. 2015;41:683–687.
   Google Scholar
• Xu H, Greenland K, Bloswick D, et al. Vacuum level effects on gait characteristics for unilateral transtibial amputees with elevated vacuum suspension. Clin Biomech. 2017;43:95–101.
   Google Scholar
• Scott H, Hughes J. Investigating The Use Of Elevated Vacuum Suspension On The Adult PFFD Patient: A Case Study. 2013;19(3):7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Seal-In V Catalog page [Internet]. Iceross seal-in® V trans-tibial liner with wave. [online]; [cited 2017 Jul 26]. 2017. Available from: https://assets.ossur.com/library/31253/IcerossSeal-InVCatalogpage.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sanders JE, Fatone S. Residual limb volume change: systematic review of measurement and management. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48:949–986.
   Google Scholar
• Lemaire ED, Wong MS. Defining Participants in Prosthetics Research. [online] Available at (http://www.ispoint.org/defining-participants-prosthetics-research). (Accessed 26 July 2017). [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.ispoint.org/defining-participants-prosthetics-research
   Google Scholar
• Sinitski EH, Lemaire ED, Baddour N. Evaluation of motion platform embedded with force plate-instrumented treadmill. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52:221–235.
   Google Scholar
• Sinitski EH, Lemaire ED, Baddour N, et al. Fixed and self-paced treadmill walking for able-bodied and transtibial amputees in a multi-terrain virtual environment. Gait Posture. 2015;41:568–573.
   Google Scholar
• Wilken JM, Rodriguez KM, Brawner M, et al. Reliability and minimal detectible change values for gait kinematics and kinetics in healthy adults. Gait Posture. 2012;35:301–307.
   Google Scholar
• Błażkiewicz M, Wiszomirska I, Wit A. Comparison of four methods of calculating the symmetry of spatial-temporal parameters of gait. Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2014;16:29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Chow DH, Holmes AD, Lee CK, et al. The effect of prosthesis alignment on the symmetry of gait in subjects with unilateral transtibial amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2006;30:114–128.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, ROBINSON, BENNO. Use of Force Platform Variables to Quantify the Effects of Chiropractic Manipulation on Gait Symmetry. 1987 Aug.
   Google Scholar
• Åström I, Stenström A. Effect on gait and socket comfort in unilateral trans-tibial amputees after exchange to a polyurethane concept. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2004;28:28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Holm-Bonferroni sequential correction: An EXCEL calculator - Google Search [Internet]. [cited 2018 Feb 12]. Available from: Gaetano J. (2013). Holm-Bonferroni sequential correction: An EXCEL calculator (1.2) [Microsoft Excel workbook]. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242331583_Holm-Bonferroni_Sequential_Correction_An_EXCEL_Calculator,Ver 1.2
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Association; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Bateni H, Olney SJ. Kinematic and kinetic variations of below-knee amputee gait. J Prosthet Orthot. 2002;14:2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Eshraghi A, Osman NAA, Karimi M, et al. Gait biomechanics of individuals with transtibial amputation: effect of suspension system. PloS One. 2014;9:e96988.
   Google Scholar
• Isakov E, Keren O, Benjuya N. Transtibial amputee gait: time-distance parameters and EMG activity. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2000;24:216–220.
   Google Scholar
• Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human gait: normal, elderly and pathological. Waterloo: University of Waterloo Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraro C. Outcomes study of transtibial amputees using elevated vacuum suspension in comparison with pin suspension. JPO J Prosthet Orthot. 2011;23:78–81.
   Google Scholar