Mobility and medical service dogs: a qualitative analysis of expectations and experiences

References

• Walther S, Yamamoto M, Thigpen AP, et al. Assistance dogs: historic patterns and roles of dogs placed by aDi or igDF accredited facilities and by non-accredited Us facilities. Front Vet Sci. 2017;4:1.
   Google Scholar
• Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub. L. No. 101-336, 104 Stat. 328;1990.
   Google Scholar
• Winkle M, Zimmerman B. An assistive technology option: assistance dogs. OT Pract. 2009;14:14–16.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent C, Gagnon DH, Dumont F. Pain, fatigue, function and participation among long-term manual wheelchair users partnered with a mobility service dog. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol. 2017;1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Herlache-Pretzer E, Winkle MY, Csatari R, et al. The impact of service dogs on engagement in occupation among females with mobility impairments: a qualitative descriptive study. IJERPH. 2017;14:649.
   Google Scholar
• Winkle M, Crowe TK, Hendrix I. Service dogs and people with physical disabilities partnerships: a systematic review. Occup Ther Int. 2012;19:54–66.
   Google Scholar
• Sachs-Ericsson N, Hansen NK, Fitzgerald S. Benefits of assistance dogs: a review. Rehabil Psychol. 2002;47:251.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine DP, Kiddoo M, LaFleur B. Psychosocial implications of service dog ownership for people who have mobility or hearing impairments. Soc Work Health Care. 1993;19:109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Lane DR, McNicholas J, Collis GM. Dogs for the disabled: benefits to recipients and welfare of the dog. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1998;59:49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Fairman SK, Huebner RA. Service dogs: a compensatory resource to improve function. Occup Ther Health Care. 2001;13:41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Rintala DH, Sachs-Ericsson N, Hart KA. The effects of service dogs on the lives of persons with mobility impairments: a pre–post study design. SCI Psychosoc Process. 2002;15:70–82.
   Google Scholar
• Hart LA, Hart BL, Bergin BL. Socializing effects of service dogs for people with disabilities. Anthrozoös. 1987;1:41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Noël Champagne E, Psy M. Effect of service dogs on manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury: a pilot study. JRRD. 2013;50:341.
   Google Scholar
• Hall SS, MacMichael J, Turner A, et al. A survey of the impact of owning a service dog on quality of life for individuals with physical and hearing disability: a pilot study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15:59.
   Google Scholar
• Shintani M, Senda M, Takayanagi T, et al. The effect of service dogs on the improvement of health-related quality of life. Acta Med Okayama. 2010;64:109–113.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez KE, Bibbo J, O’Haire ME (2019) The effects of service dogs on psychosocial health and wellbeing for individuals with physical disabilities or chronic conditions. Disability and Rehabilitation. [published online Jan 11 2019]
   Google Scholar
• Eddy J, Hart LA, Boltz RP. The effects of service dogs on social acknowledgments of people in wheelchairs. J Psychol. 1988;122:39.
   Google Scholar
• Mader B, Hart LA, Bergin B. Social acknowledgments for children with disabilities: effects of service dogs. Child Dev. 1989;60:1529–1534.
   Google Scholar
• Crowe TK, Perea-Burns S, Sedillo JS, et al. Effects of partnerships between people with mobility challenges and service dogs. Am J Occup Ther. 2014;68:194–202.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz R, Sherwood PR. Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving. J Soc Work Educ. 2008;44:105–113.
   Google Scholar
• Plant KM, Sanders MR. Predictors of care‐giver stress in families of preschool‐aged children with developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2007;51:109–124.
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie AJ, Leech NL. On becoming a pragmatic researcher: the importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:375–387.
   Google Scholar
• Rintala DH, Matamoros R, Seitz LL. Effects of assistance dogs on persons with mobility or hearing impairments: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:489–503.
   Google Scholar
• Davis BW, Nattrass K, O'Brien S, et al. Assistance dog placement in the pediatric population: benefits, risks, and recommendations for future application. Anthrozoös. 2004;17:130–145.
   Google Scholar
• Camp MM. The use of service dogs as an adaptive strategy: a qualitative study. Am J Occup Ther. 2001;55:509–517.
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62:107–115.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288.
   Google Scholar
• Hart LA, Zasloff RL, Benfatto AM. The pleasures and problems of hearing dog ownership. Psychol Rep. 1995;77:969–970.
   Google Scholar
• Gonder-Frederick L, Rice P, Warren D, et al. Diabetic alert dogs: a preliminary survey of current users. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:e47.
   Google Scholar
• Kirton A, Winter A, Wirrell E, et al. Seizure response dogs: evaluation of a formal training program. Epilepsy Behav. 2008;13:499–504.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman JA, Ingram KM, Bays A, et al. Disability and assistance dog implicit association test: a novel IAT. Rehabil Psychol. 2015;60:17.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto M, Hart LA, Ohta M, et al. Obstacles and anticipated problems associated with acquiring assistance dogs, as expressed by Japanese people with physical disabilities. Hum-Anim Interact Bull. 2014;2:59–79.
   Google Scholar
• Mills ML. Invisible disabilities, visible service dogs: the discrimination of service dog handlers. Disabil Soc. 2017;32:635–656.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer F, Bennett PC, Coleman GJ. Development of the Monash dog owner relationship scale (MDORS). Anthrozoös. 2006;19:243–256.
   Google Scholar