Creating a digital memory notebook application for individuals with mild cognitive impairment to support everyday functioning

References

• Farias ST, Mungas D, Reed BR, et al. MCI is associated with deficits in everyday functioning. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2006;20:217–223.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Woo E, Greeley DR. Characterizing multiple memory deficits and their relation to everyday functioning in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychology. 2009;23:168–177.
   Google Scholar
• Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, et al. Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:519–530.
   Google Scholar
• Ferman TJ, Smith G, Kantarci K, et al. Nonamnestic mild cognitive impairment progresses to dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology. 2013;81:2032–2038.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, et al. Mild Cognitive Impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999;56:303–308.
   Google Scholar
• Alz.org [Internet]. Chicago (IL): Alzheimer’s Association; [cited 2018 Sep 4]. Available from: https://alz.org/
   Google Scholar
• Caregiving.org [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Alliance for Caregiving; [cited 2018 Sep 4]. Available from: https://www.caregiving.org
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Howard JT, Pavawalla SP, et al. Multidyad memory notebook intervention for very mild dementia: a pilot study. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2008;23:477–487.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Dyck DG. Cognitive rehabilitation multi-family group intervention for individuals with mild cognitive impairment and their care-partners. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2014;20:897–908.
   Google Scholar
• Greenaway MC, Duncan NL, Smith GE. The memory support system for mild cognitive impairment: randomized trial of a cognitive rehabilitation intervention. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013;28:402–409.
   Google Scholar
• Troyer AK, Murphy KJ, Anderson ND, et al. Changing everyday memory behaviour in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: a randomized controlled trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18:65–88.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson M, Cullen B, McGee-Lennon M, et al. Technological memory aid use by people with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017;27:919–936.
   Google Scholar
• Evald L. Prospective memory rehabilitation using smartphones in patients with TBI. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:2250–2259.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Evans J, Emslie H, et al. Evaluation of NeuroPage: a new memory aid. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;63:113–115.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin RA, Lincoln NB, das Nair R, et al. Evaluation of NeuroPage as a memory aid for people with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018;1–17. Forthcoming. Epub ahead of print.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhorn CB, Stronge AJ, McLaughlin AC, et al. Older adults, computer training, and the systems approach: a formula for success. Educ Gerontol. 2004;30:185–203.
   Google Scholar
• Inglis EA, Szymkowiak A, Gregor P, et al. Usable technology? Challenges in designing a memory aid with current electronic devices. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2004;14:77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay M, Nielsen J. WAP usability déjà vu: 1994 all over again. London: Nielsen Norman Group. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wright P, Rogers N, Hall C, et al. Comparison of pocket-computer memory aids for people with brain injury. Brain Inj. 2001;15:787–800.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz-Bossini JM, Moreno L. Accessibility to mobile interfaces for older people. Proc Comput Sci. 2014;27:57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Dahmen J, Minor B, Cook D, et al. Design of a smart home-driven digital memory notebook to support self-management of activities for older adults. Gerontechnology. 2018;17:113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen J. How many test users in a usability study? Amsterdam: Nielsen Norman Group; 2012. Available from: http://www.nngroup.com
   Google Scholar
• Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:695–699.
   Google Scholar
• Tam J, Van Son C, Dyck D, et al. An educational video series to increase aging services technologies awareness among older adults. Patient Educ Counsel. 2017;100:1564–1571.
   Google Scholar
• Chin JP, Diehl VA, Norman KL. Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human–computer interface. CHI Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Washington, DC: ACM; 1988 May 1.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis J. Psychometric evaluation of the post-study system usability questionnaire: the PSSUQ. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting; Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting; 1992 Oct 12–16; Atlanta, GA; 1992. p. 1259–1260.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis J, Henry S, Mack R. Integrated office software benchmarks: a case study. Proceedings of the Third IFIP Conference on Human–Computer Interaction – INTERACT; 1990 Aug 27–30; Cambridge, UK. p. 43.
   Google Scholar
• Fruhling A, Lee S. Assessing the reliability, validity and adaptability of PSSUQ. Proceedings of the 11th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS: A Conference on a Human Scale; 2005 Aug 11–15; Omaha, NE. p. 2231–2239.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Fahy JF, Whelan JP, et al. Memory remediation after severe closed-head injury: notebook training versus supportive therapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995;63:484–489.
   Google Scholar
• Cardello J. Five essential analytics reports for UX strategists. Nielsen Norman Group; 2014. Available from: http://www.nngroup.com
   Google Scholar
• Choi W, Tulu B. Effective use of user interface and user experience in an mHealth application. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; Hawaii, USA: Hilton Waikoloa Village; 2017. p. 3803–3812.
   Google Scholar
• Pino M, Granata C, Legouverneur G, et al. Assessing design features of a graphical user interface for a social assistive robot for older adults with cognitive impairment. Proceedings of the 29th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction and the 8th World Conference of the International Society for Gerontechnology; Eindhoven, The Netherlands; 2012 Jun.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen J. Thinking aloud: the #1 usability tool. Fremont: Nielsen Norman Group; 2012; Available from: http://www.nngroup.com
   Google Scholar
• Chudoba L, Sawaqdeh Church A, Dahmen J, et al. The development of a manual-based digital memory notebook intervention with case illustrations; 2018, under review.
   Google Scholar