Does the purchase of a mobility scooter alter physical activity levels in older adults?

References

• Sullivan SJ, La Grow S, Alla S, et al. Riding into the future: a snapshot of elderly mobility scooter riders and how they use their scooters. N Z Med J. 2014;127:43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt Å, Iwarsson S, Ståhle A. Older people's use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36:70–77.
   Google Scholar
• Fomiatti R, Richmond J, Moir L, et al. A systematic review of the impact of powered mobility devices on older adults' activity engagement. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2013;31:297–309.
   Google Scholar
• Löfqvist C, Pettersson C, Iwarsson S, et al. Mobility and mobility-related participation outcomes of powered wheelchair and scooter interventions after 4-months and 1-year use. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7:211–218.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson I, Hagberg L, Fredriksson C, et al. The effect of powered scooters on activity, participation and quality of life in elderly users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11:558–563.
   Google Scholar
• Salminen A, Brandt A, Samuelsson K, et al. Mobility devices to promote activity and participation: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:697–706.
   Google Scholar
• Dutta T, King EC, Holliday PJ, et al. Design of built environments to accommodate mobility scooter users: part i. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:67–76.
   Google Scholar
• King EC, Dutta T, Gorski SM, et al. Design of built environments to accommodate mobility scooter users: part II. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:432–439.
   Google Scholar
• Korotchenko A, Hurd Clarke L. Power mobility and the built environment: the experiences of older Canadians. Disabil Soc. 2014;29:431–443.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards K, McCluskey A. A survey of adult power wheelchair and scooter users. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5:411–419.
   Google Scholar
• Ben Mortenson W, Kim J. Scoping review of mobility scooter-related research studies. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53:531–540.
   Google Scholar
• Thoreau R. The impact of mobility scooters on their users. Does their usage help or hinder? a state of the art review. J Transp Health. 2015;2:269–275.
   Google Scholar
• World Population Ageing: 1950-2050. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division; 2001; [cited 2018 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/worldageing19502050/.
   Google Scholar
• Impact of Population Ageing in New Zealand on the Demand for Health and Disability Support services and Workforce Implications. Wellington, New Zealand: Cornwall J, Davey JA; 2004; [cited 2018 Jun 3]. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/system/files/documents/publications/cornwallanddavey.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Global Strategy on Diet Physical Activity & Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018; [cited 2018 Jun 6]. Available from: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/factsheet_olderadults/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Hendry F, McVittie C. Is quality of life a healthy concept? Measuring and understanding life experiences of older peoples. Qual Health Res. 2004;14:961–975.
   Google Scholar
• May E, Garrett R, Ballantyne A. Being mobile: electric mobility-scooters and their use by older people. Ageing Soc. 2010;30:1219–1237.
   Google Scholar
• González K, Fuentes J, Márquez JL. Physical inactivity, sedentary behavior and chronic diseases. Korean J Fam Med. 2017;38:111–115.
   Google Scholar
• Owen N, Sparling PB, Healy GN, et al. Sedentary behavior: emerging evidence for a new health risk. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85:1138–1141.
   Google Scholar
• Zagol BW, Krasuski RA. Effect of motorized scooters on quality of life and cardiovascular risk. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105:672–676.
   Google Scholar
• Hoenig H, Huffman K, Iezzoni L, et al. Motorized scooters: boon or bane? Am J Cardiol. 2010;106:601.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbroucke JP, Von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology. 2007;18:805–835.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtig-Wennlf A, Hagstrmer M, Olsson LA. The international physical activity questionnaire modified for the elderly: aspects of validity and feasibility. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13:1847–1854.
   Google Scholar
• Guidelines on Physical Activity for Older People (aged 65 years and over). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2013; [cited 2018 Jan 19]. Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/guidelines-physical-activity-older-people-aged-65-years-and-over.
   Google Scholar
• Guidelines for Data Processing and Analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) - Short Form. The IPAQ Group; 2015; [cited 2017 Nov 1]. Available from: http://www.ipaq.ki.se
   Google Scholar
• Mobility scooters. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Transport Agency; 2018; [cited 2018 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.nzta.govt.nz/vehicles/vehicle-types/low-powered-vehicles/mobility-scooters/.
   Google Scholar
• Thoreau R. Perception of needing and using a mobility scooter: a preclinically disabled non-scooter user perspective. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018. DOI:10.1080/17483107.2018.1499136
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon RW. Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. Age Ageing. 1997;26:15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Walking: New Zealand Household Travel Survey 2011–2014. New Zealand Ministry of Transport; 2015 [Cited 2018 Jul 2]. Available from: https://www.transport.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Research/Documents/Walking-2015-y1012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hoenig H, Pieper C, Branch LG, et al. Effect of motorized scooters on physical performance and mobility: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:279–286.
   Google Scholar
• Heesch KC, van Uffelen JGZ, Hill RL, et al. What do IPAQ questions mean to older adults? Lessons from cognitive interviews. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:35.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan DJ, Wullems JA, Stebbings GK, et al. Reliability and validity of the international physical activity questionnaire compared to calibrated accelerometer cut-off points in the quantification of sedentary behaviour and physical activity in older adults. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0195712.
   Google Scholar
• Boon RM, Hamlin MJ, Steel GD, et al. Validation of the New Zealand physical activity questionnaire (NZPAQ-LF) and the international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ-LF) with accelerometry. Brit J Sport Med. 2010;44:741–746.
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Health Survey 2016-2017. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2018; [cited 2018 Aug 9]. Available from: https://minhealthnz.shinyapps.io/nz-health-survey-2016-17-annual-data-explorer/_w_65d0d903/#!/explore-indicators.
   Google Scholar