The intelligibility and comprehension of synthetic versus natural speech in dyslexic students

References

• Boada R, Pennington BF. Deficient implicit phonological representations in children with dyslexia. J Exp Child Psychol. 2006;95:153–193.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlidis G. Sequencing eye movements and the early objective diagnosis of dyslexia. In Pavlidis GTH, Miles TR, editors. Dyslexia research and its applications to education. Chichester, England: John Willey & Sons; 1981. p. 99–163.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlidis G. Do eye movements hold the key to dyslexia? Neuropsychology. 1981;19:57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Snowling M, Hulme C, Goulandris N. Word recognition in developmental dyslexia: a connectionist approach. Quart J Exp Psychol. 1994;47:895–916.
   Google Scholar
• Snowling M, Nation K, Moxham P, et al. Phonological processing skills of dyslexic students in higher education: a preliminary report. J Res in Reading. 1997;20:31–41.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon G, Shaywitz SE, Shaywitz BA. A definition of dyslexia. Ann Dyslexia. 2003;53:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bogliotti C, Serniclaes W, Messaoud-Galusi S. Discrimination of speech sounds by children with dyslexia: comparisons with chronological age and reading level controls. J Exp Child Psychol. 2008;101:137–155.
   Google Scholar
• Sprenger-Charolles L, Colé P, Serniclaes W. Reading acquisition and developmental dyslexia. Hove (UK): Psychology Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer H. Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system. Appl Psychol. 1993;14:1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Chiappe P, Chiappe DL, Siegel LS. Speech perception, lexicality, and reading skill. J Exp Child Psychol. 2001;80:58–74.
   Google Scholar
• Landerl K, Wimmer H. Deficits in phoneme segmentation are not the core problem of dyslexia: evidence from German and English children. Appl Psychol. 2000;21:243–262.
   Google Scholar
• Caravolas M, Volín J, Hulme C. Phoneme awareness is a key component of alphabetic literacy skills in consistent and inconsistent orthographies: evidence from Czech and English children. J Exp Child Psychol. 2005;92:107–139.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler JC, Pech-Georgel C, George F, et al. Speech-perception-in-noise deficits in dyslexia. Dev Sci. 2009;12:732–745.
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino FR, Fletcher JM, Snowling MJ, et al. Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades? J Child Psychol Psychiat. 2004;45:2–40.
   Google Scholar
• Olson RK, Wise BW. Reading on the computer with orthographic and speech feedback. Read Writ. 1992;4:107–144.
   Google Scholar
• De Weirdt W. Speech perception and frequency discrimination in good and poor readers. Appl Psycholinguist. 1988;9:163–183.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey JJ, Syrdal-Lasky AK, Millay KK, et al. Performance of dyslexic children on speech perception tests. J Exp Child Psychol. 1981;32:401–424.
   Google Scholar
• Reed MA. Speech perception and the discrimination of brief auditory cues in reading disabled children. J Exp Child Psychol. 1989;48:270–292.
   Google Scholar
• Serniclaes W, Sprenger-Charolles L, Carré R, et al. Perceptual discrimination of speech sounds in developmental dyslexia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;44:384–399.
   Google Scholar
• Werker JF, Tees RC. Speech perception in severely disabled and average reading children. Can J Psychol. 1987;41:48.
   Google Scholar
• Steffens ML, Eilers RE, Gross-Glenn K, et al. Speech perception in adult subjects with familial dyslexia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1992;35:192–200.
   Google Scholar
• Sermicles W, Ventura M., Kolinsky. Categorical perception of speech sounds in illiterate adults. Cognition. 2005;98:B35–B44.
   Google Scholar
• Blomert L, Mitterer H. The fragile nature of the speech-perception deficit in dyslexia: natural vs. synthetic speech. Brain Lang. 2004;89:21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Blomert L, Mitterer H, Paffen C. In search of the auditory, phonetic, and/or phonological problems in dyslexia: context effects in speech perception. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004;47:1030–1047.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson EK, Joanisse MF, Desroches AS, et al. Categorical speech perception deficits distinguish language and reading impairments in children. Dev Sci. 2009;12:753–767.
   Google Scholar
• Hurford DP, Sanders RE. Assessment and remediation of a phonemic discrimination deficit in reading disabled second and fourth graders. J Exp Child Psychol. 1990;50:396–415.
   Google Scholar
• Zade R, Ardril C, Sharifova A. The main principles of text to speech synthesis system. Int J Comput Info Eng. 2013;7:395–401.
   Google Scholar
• Van Bezooijen R, Pols L. Evaluating text to speech: some methodological aspects. Speech Commun. 1990;9:263–270.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy SA, Pisoni DB. Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: a review and theoretical interpretation. Lang Speech. 1992;35:351–389.
   Google Scholar
• Koul RK, Allen GD. Segmental intelligibility and speech interference thresholds of high-quality synthetic speech in presence of noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1993;36:790–798.
   Google Scholar
• Tunmer W, Greaney K. Defining dyslexia. J Learn Disabil. 2009;43:229–243.
   Google Scholar
• Fellbaum K, Koroupetroglou G. Principles of electronic speech processing with applications for people with disabilities. Technol Disabil. 2008;20:55–85.
   Google Scholar
• Koul R. Synthetic speech perception in individuals with and without disabilities. Augment Alter Commun. 2003;19:49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds ME, Fucci D. Synthetic speech comprehension: a comparison of children with normal and impaired language skills. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;41:458–466.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds M, Jefferson L. Natural and synthetic speech comprehension: comparison of children from two age groups. Augment Altern Commun. 1999;15:174–182.
   Google Scholar
• Grancharov V. Speech quality assessment. In Springer DE, editor. Handbook of speech processing. Vol. 69. Berlin: Springler; 2008. p. 83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Dutoit, T. Corpus-based speech synthesis. In: Benesty J, Sondhi M, Huang Y, editors. Springer handbook of speech processing. Springer handbooks. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2008. p. 437–456.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell J. The hero with a thousand faces. Vol. 17. Novato (CA): New World Library; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Kouroupetroglou P. Text signals and accessibility of educational documents. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the “Advances in Computer and Technology for Education” WSEAS Press. 11th International Conference on Educational Technologies: EDUTE; 2015. p. 45–51.
   Google Scholar
• Argyropoulos V, Papadopoulos K, Kouroupetroglou G, et al. Discrimination and perception of the acoustic rendition of texts by blind people. Comput Sci. 2007;4556:205–213.
   Google Scholar
• Koul R, Hester K. Effects of repeated listening experiences on the recognition synthetic speech by individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006;49:47–57.
   Google Scholar
• Hensil J, Whittaker S. Visual reading versus auditory reading by sighted persons and persons with low vision. J Vis Impair Blind. 2000;94:762–770.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas D, Kouroupetroglou G. Speech technologies for blind and low vision persons. Technol Disabil. 2008;20:135–156.
   Google Scholar
• Goudiras DB, Papadopoulos KS, Koutsoklenis AC, et al. Factors affecting the reading media used by visually impaired adults. Br J Vis Impair. 2009;27:111–127.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos K, Koutsoklenis A. Reading media used by higher-education students and graduates with visual impairments in Greece. J Vis Impair Blind. 2009;103:772–779.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos K, Koutsoklenis A, Katemidou E, et al. Perception of synthetic and natural speech by adults with visual impairments. J Vis Impair Blind. 2009;103:403.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos K, Argyropoulos VS, Kouroupetroglou G. Discrimination and comprehension of synthetic speech by students with visual impairments: the case of similar acoustic patterns. J Vis Impair Blind. 2008;102:420.
   Google Scholar
• Xydas G, Kouroupetroglou G. The DEMOSTHeNES speech composer. Paper presented at: 4th ISCA Tutorial and Workshop on Speech Synthesis (SSW4) – International Speech Communication Association. Perthshire, Scotland; 2001. pp. 167–172.
   Google Scholar
• Xydas G, Kouroupetroglou G. Text-to-speech scripting interface for appropriate vocalisation of e-texts. Paper presented at: European conference on speech communication and technology. 7th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (EUROSPEECH 2001); September 2001; Aalborg, Denmark. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Xydas G, Kouroupetroglou G. Tone-Group F 0 selection for modeling focus prominence in small-footprint speech synthesis. Speech Commun. 2006;48:1057–1078.
   Google Scholar
• Trimmis N, Papadeas E, Papadas T, et al. Speech audiometry: the development of modern Greek word lists for suprathreshold word recognition testing. Mediter J Otol. 2006;3:117–126.
   Google Scholar
• Panteliadou S. αntoniou F. τεστ ανάγνωσης α’ [Reading test A’]. αthens, Greece: Ministry of Education, Research and Religious Affairs-EPEAEK; 2007.
   Google Scholar