https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0239-304X
References
- Chaves ES, Boninger ML, Cooper R. Assessing the influence of wheelchair technology on perception of participation in spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1854–1858.
- Fogelberg D, Atkins M, Blanche EI, et al. Decisions and Dilemmas in everyday life: daily use of wheelchairs by individuals with spinal cord injury and the impact on pressure ulcer risk. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2009;15:16–32.
- Samuelsson K, Wressle E. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices: an important element in the rehabilitation process. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:551–558.
- Ding D, Leister E, Cooper RA, et al. Usage of tilt-in-space, recline, and elevation seating functions in natural environment of wheelchair users. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:973–984.
- Lacoste M, Weiss-Lambrous R, Allard M, et al. Powered tilt/recline systems: why and how are they used? Assist Technol. 2003;15:58–68.
- Michael SM, Porter D, Pountney TE. Tilted seat position for non-ambulant individual with neurological and neuromuscular impairment: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:1063–1074.
- Sonenblum S, Sprigle S, Maurer C. Use of power tilt systems in everyday life. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009;4:24–30.
- Sonenblum SE, Sprigle S. Distinct tilting behaviours with power tilt-in-space systems. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6:525–535.
- Sonenblum SE, Sprigle S, Harris FH, et al. Characterization of power wheelchair use in the home and community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:486–491.
- Dewey A, Rice-Oxley M, Dean T. A qualitative study comparing the experiences of tilt-in-space wheelchair use and conventional wheelchair use by clients severely disabled with multiple sclerosis. Br J Occup Therapy. 2004;67:65–74.
- Corbin J, Strauss A. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2008.
- Titus LC, Polgar JM. Reasons for using power tilt: perspectives from clients and therapists. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:132–139.
- Ballinger C. Demonstrating rigour and quality? In: Finlay L, Ballinger C, editors. Qualitative research for allied health professional: challenging choices. West Sussex (England): John Wiley and Sons Ltd; 2006. p. 235–246.
- Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. California: SAGE Publications Inc.; 1985.
- Morrow S. Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. J Counsel Psychol. 2005;52:250–260.
- Finlay L. ‘Going exploring’: the nature of qualitative research. In: Finlay L, Ballinger C, editors. Qualitative research for allied health professionals: challenging choices. Sussex (England): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2006. p. 1–8.
- Stanley M. A grounded theory of the well-being of older people. In: Finlay L, Ballinger C, editors. Qualitative research for allied health professionals: challenging choices. Sussex (England): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2006. p. 63–78.
- Baker PS, Bodner EV, Allman RM. Measuring life-space mobility in community-dwelling older adults. J Aging and Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:1610–1614.
- Peel C, Sawyer BP, Roth DL, et al. Assessing mobility in older adults: the UAB study of aging life-space assessment. Phys Therapy. 2005;85:1008–1019.
- Laliberte Rudman D, Hebert D, Reid D. Living in a restricted occupational world: the occupational experiences of stroke survivors who are wheelchair users and their caregivers. Can J Occup Ther. 2006;73:141–152.
- Scherer MJ. Assistive technology: matching device and consumer for successful rehabilitation. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2002.
- Cook AM, Miller Polgar JM. Assistive technology: principles and practice. 4th ed. Activity, human, and context: the human doing an activity in context. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2015. p. 40–67.