Assistive robots to improve the independent living of older persons: results from a needs study

References

• Eurostat. Population structure and ageing – statistics explained; [cited 2017 Oct 26]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Population_structure_and_ageing
   Google Scholar
• Miltenburger C, Borgstrom F. Beyond product value – a holistic approach for value assessment. ISPOR 20th Annual European Congress; 2017 Nov 4–8; Glasgow, Scotland, UK, p. 573–576.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert JK, Morgan LA, Swamy N. Preferences for receipt of care among community-dwelling adults. J Aging Soc Policy. 2004;16:49–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peek STM, Aarts S, Wouters EJM. Can smart home technology deliver on the promise of independent living? In: van Hoof J, Demiris G, Wouters E, editors. Handbook of smart homes, health care and well-being. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 203–214.
   Google Scholar
• Boldy D, Grenade L, Lewin G, et al. Older people’s decisions regarding ‘ageing in place’: a Western Australian case study. Australas J Ageing. 2011;30:136–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzelthin SF, Verbakel E, Veenstra MY, et al. Positive and negative outcomes of informal caregiving at home and in institutionalised long-term care: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaschowitz J, Brandt M. Health effects of informal caregiving across Europe: a longitudinal approach. Soc Sci Med. 2017;173:72–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barcaccia B, Esposito G, Matarese M, et al. Defining quality of life: a wild-goose chase? EJOP. 2013;9:185–203.
   Google Scholar
• WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (Whoqol): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46:1569–1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung M, Yu J, Chow H. Impact of indoor facilities management on the quality of life of the elderly in public housing. Facilities. 2016;34:564–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahlknecht P, Kiechl S, Bloem BR, et al. Prevalence and burden of gait disorders in elderly men and women aged 60–97 years: a population-based study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e69627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker C, Barnes S, McKee K, et al. Quality of life and building design in residential and nursing homes for older people. Ageing Soc. 2004;24:941–962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollenkopf H, Marcellini F, Ruoppila I, et al. Social and behavioural science perspectives on out-of-home mobility in later life: findings from the European project MOBILATE. Eur J Ageing. 2004;1:45–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webber SC, Porter MM, Menec VH. Mobility in older adults: a comprehensive framework. Gerontologist. 2010;50:443–450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buczylowska D, Petermann F. Age-related differences and heterogeneity in executive functions: analysis of NAB executive functions module scores. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016;31:254–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, van Lerberghe W. The world health report 2008: primary health care: now more than ever. World Health Organization; 2008; [cited 2017 Dec 11]. Available from: https://books.google.it/books?hl=it&lr=&id=q-EGxRjrIo4C&oi=fnd&pg=PR8&dq=World+Health+Organization + 2008+caregiver&ots=YdqBQYALFp&sig=pvPfJbkckQtbnLOmCEIbAOP6dek#v=onepage&q=World Health Organization 2008 caregiver&f=false
   Google Scholar
• Adelman RD, Tmanova LL, Delgado D, et al. Caregiver burden. JAMA. 2014;311:1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiao CY, Wu HS, Hsiao CY. Caregiver burden for informal caregivers of patients with dementia: a systematic review. Int Nurs Rev. 2015;62:340–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penteridis L, D'Onofrio G, Sancarlo D, et al. Robotic and sensor technologies for mobility in older people. Rejuvenation Res. 2017;20:401–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent E, Stafford R, MacDonald B. Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: review and future directions. Int J Soc Robot. 2009;1:319–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson H, MacDonald B, Broadbent E. The role of healthcare robots for older people at home: a review. Int J Soc Robot. 2014;6:575–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineau J, Montemerlo M, Pollack M, et al. Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: challenges and results. Rob Auton Syst. 2003;42:271–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čaić M, Odekerken-Schröder G, Mahr D. Service robots: value co-creation and co-destruction in elderly care networks. J Serv Manag. 2018;29:178–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon S, Lee J, Kim J. Multi-robot task allocation for real-time hospital logistics. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC); 2017 Oct 5–8; Banff, AB, Canada. p. 2465–2470.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorini L, Esposito R, Bonaccorsi M, et al. Enabling personalised medical support for chronic disease management through a hybrid robot-cloud approach. Auton Robot. 2017;41:1263–1276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittmann R, Fröhlich T, Schäfer J, et al. Let me Introduce Myself: I am Care-O-bot 4, a Gentleman Robot. Mensch und Computer 2015 Tagungsband. Stuttgart: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag; 2015. p. 223–232; [cited 2018 Jan 16]. Available from: http://dl.mensch-und-computer.de/bitstream/handle/123456789/4616/Kittmann_etal_2015.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Sancarlo D, D’Onofrio G, Oscar J, et al. MARIO project: a multicenter survey about companion robot acceptability in caregivers of patients with dementia. In: Cavallo F, Marletta V, Monteriù A, et al., editors. Ambient Assisted Living. ForItAAL 2016. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, Vol. 426. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 311–336.
   Google Scholar
• Coradeschi S, Cesta A, Cortellessa G, et al. GiraffPlus: a system for monitoring activities and physiological parameters and promoting social interaction for elderly. In: Hippe Z, Kulikowski J, Mroczek T, et al., editors. Human-Computer Systems Interaction: Backgrounds and Applications 3. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Vol 300. Cham: Springer; 2014. p. 261–271.
   Google Scholar
• Gerłowska J, Skrobas U, Grabowska-Aleksandrowicz K, et al. Assessment of perceived attractiveness, usability, and societal impact of a multimodal robotic assistant for aging patients with memory impairments. Front Neurol. 2018;9:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorini L, D’Onofrio G, Limosani R, et al. ACCRA project: agile co-creation for robots and aging. 8th Forum Italiano Ambient Assisted Living, ForItAAL; 2017 Jun 12–15; Genova. Cham: Springer. p. 133–150.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito R, Fiorini L, Limosani R, et al. Supporting active and healthy aging with advanced robotics integrated in smart environment; 2015. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-1759-7.ch110
   Google Scholar
• Winkle K, Caleb-Solly P, Turton A, et al. Mutual shaping in the design of socially assistive robots: a case study on social robots for therapy. Int J Soc Robot. 2019:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glende S, Conrad I, Krezdorn L, et al. Increasing the acceptance of assistive robots for older people through marketing strategies based on stakeholder needs. Int J Soc Robot. 2016;8:355–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallo F, Limosani R, Fiorini L, et al. Design impact of acceptability and dependability in assisted living robotic applications. Int J Interact Des Manuf. 2018;12:1167.
   Google Scholar
• Grbich C. Qualitative data analysis. An introduction. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Sage; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Robotics 2020 Multi-Annual Roadmap; [cited 2018 Jan 30]. Available from: https://www.eu-robotics.net/cms/upload/topic_groups/H2020_Robotics_Multi-Annual_Roadmap_ICT-2017B.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marder-Eppstein E, Berger E, Foote T, et al. The office marathon: robust navigation in an indoor office environment; [cited 2017 Dec 13]. Available from: http://library.isr.ist.utl.pt/docs/roswiki/attachments/Papers(2f)ICRA2010_Marder(2d)Eppstein/icra2010_marder-eppstein.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ambrus R, Bore N, Folkesson J, et al. Meta-rooms: building and maintaining long term spatial models in a dynamic world. 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; 2014 Sep 14–18; Chicago, Illinois, USA; IEEE. p. 1854–1861.
   Google Scholar
• Limosani R, Morales LY, Even J, et al. Long-term human affordance maps. 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); 2015 Sep 28–Oct 3; Hamburg, Germany; IEEE. p. 5748–5754.
   Google Scholar
• Limosani R, Manzi A, Fiorini L, et al. Enabling global robot navigation based on a cloud robotics approach. Int J Soc Robot. 2016;8:371–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis M, Canamero L. Are discrete emotions useful in human–robot interaction? Feedback from motion capture analysis. 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction; 2013 Sep 2–5; Geneva, Switzerland. p. 97–102.
   Google Scholar
• Shafrin J, Sullivan J, Goldman DP, et al. The association between observed mobility and quality of life in the near elderly. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0182920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis JC, Bryan S, Li LC, et al. Mobility and cognition are associated with wellbeing and health related quality of life among older adults: a cross-sectional analysis of the Vancouver Falls Prevention Cohort. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdi J, Al-Hindawi A, Ng T, et al. Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e018815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng ICL, Wakenshaw SYL. The Internet-of-Things: review and research directions. Int J Res Mark. 2017;34:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donath L, Faude O, Lichtenstein E, et al. Mobile inertial sensor based gait analysis: validity and reliability of spatiotemporal gait characteristics in healthy seniors. Gait Posture. 2016;49:371–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cifuentes CA, Rodriguez C, Frizera-Neto A, et al. Multimodal human–robot interaction for walker-assisted gait. IEEE Syst J. 2016;10:933–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard RW. Affective computing. Pattern Recognit. 1995;20:304.
   Google Scholar
• Soleymani M, Asghari-Esfeden S, Fu Y, et al. Analysis of EEG signals and facial expressions for continuous emotion detection. IEEE Trans Affective Comput. 2016;7:17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moshkina L, Park S, Arkin RC, et al. TAME: time-varying affective response for humanoid robots. Int J Soc Robot. 2011;3:207–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Hirano H, Edahiro A, et al. Sarcopenia: prevalence and associated factors based on different suggested definitions in community-dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016;16:110–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landi F, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Liperoti R, et al. Sarcopenia and mortality risk in frail older persons aged 80 years and older: results from ilSIRENTE study. Age Ageing. 2013;42:203–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawadi PN, Cook DJ, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. Automated cognitive health assessment using smart home monitoring of complex tasks. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2013;43:1302–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagalà F, Becker C, Cappello A, et al. Evaluation of accelerometer-based fall detection algorithms on real-world falls. PLoS One. 2012;7:e37062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorini L, Cavallo F, Dario P, et al. Unsupervised machine learning for developing personalised behaviour models using activity data. Sensors. 2017;17:1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peek STM, Wouters EJM, van Hoof J, et al. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83:235–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luijkx K, Peek S, Wouters E. “Grandma, You Should Do It-It's Cool” older adults and the role of family members in their acceptance of technology. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:15470–15485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Mis Q. 1989;13:319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prahalad Venkatram CK, Ramaswamy V. The future of competition: co-creating unique value with customers. Brighton, MA, USA: Harvard Business School Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• D’Onofrio G, Fiorini L, de Mul M, et al. Agile Co-Creation for Robots and Aging (ACCRA) project: new technological solutions for older people. Eur Geriatr Med. 2018;9:795–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar