A systematic review and meta-analysis of digital noise reduction hearing aids in adults

References

• Moore B. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear Hear. 1996;17:133–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am. 1978;63:533–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schum DJ. Noise-reduction circuitry in hearing aids: (2) goals and current strategies. Hear J. 2003;56:32–33.
   Google Scholar
• Powers T, Holube I, Wesselkamp M. The use of digital filters to combat background noise. Hear Rev. 1999;3:36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Boll SB. Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process. 1979;27:113–120.
   Google Scholar
• Ephraim Y, Malah D. Speech enhancement using a minimum mean square error STSA estimation. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process. 1984;32:1109–1121.
   Google Scholar
• Hamacher V, Chalupper J, Eggers J, et al. Signal processing in high-end hearing aids: state of the art, challenges, and future trends. EURASIP J Appl Signal Process. 2005;18:2915–2929.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters H, Kuk F, Lau CC, et al. Subjective and objective evaluation of noise management algorithms. J Am Acad Audiol. 2009;20:89–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricketts TA, Hornsby B. Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing digital noise reduction. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16:270–277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mueller HG, Weber J, Hornsby B. The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise. Trends Amplif. 2006;10:83–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentler R, Wu YH, Kettel J, et al. Digital noise reduction: outcomes from laboratory and field studies. Int J Audiol. 2008;47:447–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuk F, Peeters H, Lau CC, et al. Effect of maximum power output and noise reduction on speech recognition in noise. J Am Acad Audiol. 2011;22:265–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brons I, Houben R, Dreschler WA. Perceptual effects of noise reduction with respect to personal preference, speech intelligibility, and listening effort. Ear Hear. 2013;34:29–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oeding K, Valente M. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid. J Am Acad Audiol. 2013;24:980–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher T. Relating hearing loss and executive functions to hearing aid users’ preference for, and speech recognition with, different combinations of binaural noise reduction and microphone directionality. Front Neurosci. 2014;8:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler RA. Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;16:473–484.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chong FY, Jenstad LM. A critical review of hearing-aid single-microphone noise-reduction studies in adults and children. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:600–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter J, Schmidt F. Methods of meta-analysis: correcting error and bias in research findings. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2004. Chapter 3, Meta-analysis of correlations corrected individually for artifacts; p. 75–135.
   Google Scholar
• McCreery RW, Venediktov RA, Coleman JJ, et al. An evidence-based systematic review of amplitude compression in hearing aids for school-age children with hearing loss. Am J Audiol. 2012;21:269–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RS, Paisley S, Davis A. Systematic review of the clinical and cost effectiveness of digital hearing aids. Br J Audiol. 2001;35:271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcántara JL, Moore BCJ, Kühnel V, et al. Evaluation of the noise reduction system in a commercial digital hearing aid. Int J Audiol. 2003;42:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boymans M, Dreschler W. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality: Estudios de campo utilizando un audifono digital con. Audiology. 2000;39:260–268
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nordrum S, Erler S, Garstecki D, et al. Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and noise reduction filters. Am J Audiol. 2006;15:81–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuen KCP, Kam ACS, Lau P. Comparative performance of an adaptive directional microphone system and a multichannel noise reduction system. J Am Acad Audiol. 2006;17:241–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brons I, Houben R, Dreschler WA. Effects of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, perceived listening effort, and personal preference in hearing-impaired listeners. Trends Hear. 2014;18. doi:10.1177/2331216514553924
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brons I, Houben R, Dreschler WA. Acoustical and perceptual comparison of noise reduction and compression hearing aid. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015;58:1363–1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins JL, Doherty KA. The effect of hearing aid noise reduction on listening effort in hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear. 2014;35:600–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins JL. The effects of hearing aid directional microphone and noise reduction processing on listening effort in older adults with hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol. 2016;27:29–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. New Delhi: Sage Publications; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. The effect size index. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Field AP, Gillett R. How to do a meta-analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2010;63:665–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walden BE, Surr RK, Cord MT, et al. Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies. J Am Acad Audiol. 2000;11:540–560.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zakis JA, Hau J, Blamey PJ. Environmental noise reduction configuration: effects on preferences, satisfaction, and speech understanding. Int J Audiol. 2009;48:853–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar