Every person is an individual: physical therapist clinical reasoning used in inpatient rehabilitation for walking assistive device prescription in patients with stroke and brain injury

References

• Heart disease and stroke statistics–2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e146–e603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Report to congress on traumatic brain injury in the United States: epidemiology and rehabilitation. Atlanta (GA): National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention; 2015. p. 1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado VG. [Internet] Centers for disease control and prevention, national center for injury prevention and control. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002–2006. [updated 2010; cited 2016 Jan 16] Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/traumaticbraininjury/pdf/blue_book.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Winstein CS, American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47:e98–e169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrenelli E, Ippoliti E, Coccia M, et al. Features and predicitors of activity limitations and participation restriction 2 years after intensive rehabilitation following first-ever stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2015;51:575–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büchele G, Rapp K, König H, et al. The risk of hospital admission due to traumatic brain injury is increased in older persons with severe functional limitations. JAMDA 2016;17:609–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan SB. Chapter 15: Stroke. In: O'Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ, Fulk GD, editors. Physical rehabilitation. 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): F. A. Davis Co.; 2014. p. 645–720.
   Google Scholar
• Fulk GD, Nirider CD. Chapter 19: Traumatic brain injury. In: O'Sullivan SB, Schmitz TJ, Fulk GD, editors. Physical rehabilitation. 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): F. A. Davis. Co; 2014. p. 859–888.
   Google Scholar
• Marzolini S, Balitsky A, Jagroop D, et al. Factors affecting attendance at an adapted cardiac rehabilitation exercise program for individuals with mobility deficits poststroke fRSS. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2016;25:87–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard Winkler S, Cowper Ripley D, Wu S, et al. Demographic and clinical variation in veterans health administration provision of assistive technology devices to veterans poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:369–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch A, Granger CV, Heinemann AW, et al. Poststroke rehabilitation: outcomes and reimbursement of inpatient rehabilitation facilities and subacute rehabilitation programs. Stroke. 2006;37:1477–1482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durning SJ, Artino AR, Schuwirth L, et al. Clarifying assumptions to enhance our understanding and assessment of clinical reasoning. Acad Med. 2013;88:442–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen N, Black L, Furze J, et al. Clinical reasoning: survey of teaching methods, integration, and assessment in entry-level physical therapist academic education. Phys Ther. 2017;97:175–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong G, Hsieh C, Putman K, et al. Physical therapy activities in stroke, knee arthroplasty, and traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: their variation, similarities, and association with functional outcomes. Phys Ther. 2011;91:1826–1837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jutai J, Coulson S, Teasell R, et al. Mobility assistive device utilization in a prospective study of patients with first-ever stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1268–1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortensen WB, Demers L, Fuher MJ, et al. Effects of an assistive technology intervention on older adults with disabilities and their informal caregivers. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92:297–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safaz I, Turk H, Yasar E, et al. Use and abandonment rates of assistive devices/orthoses in patients with stroke. Gulhane Med J. 2015;57:142–144.
   Google Scholar
• Skolarus LE, Burke JF, Freedman VA. The role of accommodations in poststroke disability management. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014;69(Suppl 1):S26–S34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verza R, Lopes Carvalho ML, Battaglia MA, et al. An interdisciplinary approach to evaluating the need for assistive technology reduces equipment abandonment. Mult Scler. 2006;12:88–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, et al. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arthanat S, Bauer SM, Lenker JA, et al. Conceptualization and measurement of assistive technology usability. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:235–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El Helou A, Bastuji-Garin S, Paillaud E, et al. Determinants for the use of ambulation AIDS in a geriatric rehabilitation care unit: A retrospective study. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13:279–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramstad A, Storli SL, Hamran T. Older individuals' experiences during the assistive technology device service delivery process. Scand J Occup Ther. 2014;21:305–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramstad A, Storli SL, Hamran T. Exploring the meaning of a new assistive technology device for older individuals. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9:493–498.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenker JA, Harris F, Taugher M, et al. Consumer perspectives on assistive technology outcomes. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013;8:373–380.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pattison KM, Brooks D, Cameron JI, et al. Factors influencing physical therapists' use of standardized measures of walking capacity poststroke across the care continuum. Phys Ther. 2015;95:1507–1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raggi A, Albanesi F, Gatti V, et al. Detecting changes following the provision of assistive devices: Utility of the WHO-DAS II. Int J Rehabil Res. 2010;33:306–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen HV, Lendal S, Schultz-Larsen K, et al. Stroke rehabilitation: assistive technology devices and environmental modifications following primary rehabilitation in hospital – a therapeutic perspective. Assist Technol. 2003;15:39–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt L, Lucki K, Bach M, et al. Rollator use and functional outcome of geriatric rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47:151–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler SLH, Vogel B, Hoenig H, et al. Cost, utilization, and policy of provision of assistive technology devices to veterans poststroke by medicare and VA. Med Care. 2011;48:558–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs J, Jones MA. Clinical decision making and multiple problem spaces. In: Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N, editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Butterworth Heinemann Elsevier; 2008. p. 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Oberg GK, Normann B, Gallagher S. Embodied-enactive clinical reasoning in physical therapy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31:244–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huhn K, Gilliland SJ, Black LL, et al. Clinical reasoning in physical therapy: a concept analysis. Phys Ther. 2019;99:440–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Physical Therapy Association. Outcome measures in patient care [Internet]. [updated 2017; cited 2019 Apr 3]. Available from: http://www.apta.org/OutcomeMeasures/
   Google Scholar
• Academy of Neurologic Physical Therapy. Academy of neurologic PT outcome measures recommendations. Professional resources [Internet]. [updated 2018; cited 2019 Jan 2]. Available from: http://www.neuropt.org/professional-resources/neurology-section-outcome-measures-recommendations
   Google Scholar
• Triccas LT, McLening B, Hendrie W, et al. Is there a standard procedure for assessing and providing assistive devices for people with neuro-disabling conditions in the United Kingdom? A nation-wide survey. Disabil Health J. 2019;12:93–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernd T, Van Der Pijl D, De Witte LP. Existing models and instruments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilitation practice. Scand J Occup Ther 2009;16:146–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar