References
- Andrich R, Mathiassen N-E, Hoogerwerf E-J, et al. Service delivery systems for assistive technology in Europe: an AAATE/EASTIN position paper. Technol Disabil. 2013;25:127–146.
- Schwarz N. Self-reports: how the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist. 1999;54:93–105.
- Desmond D, Layton N, Bentley J, et al. Assistive technology and people: a position paper from the first global research, innovation and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:437–444.
- Hagen I, Holthe T, Gilliard J, et al. Development of a protocol for the assessment of assistive aids for people with dementia. Dementia. 2004;3:281–296.
- Kohlstedt K. Least resistance: how desire paths can lead to better design. 99% Invisible. 2016 [cited 2019 Aug 5]. Available from: https://99percentinvisible.org/article/least-resistance-desire-paths-can-lead-better-design/
- Zabala J. The SETT Framework: critical areas to consider when making informed assistive technology decisions. 1995 [cited 2019 Aug 5]. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/39703934/The_SETT_Framework_Critical_Areas_to_Consider_When_Making_Informed_Assistive_Technology_Decisions
- Scheer J, Kroll T, Neri MT, et al. Access barriers for persons with disabilities: the consumer's perspective. Journal of Disability Policy Studies. 2003;13:221–230.
- Gamble MJ, Dowler DL, Hirsh AE. Informed decision making on assistive technology workplace accommodations for people with visual impairments. Work. 2004;23:123–130.
- Enable Ireland and Disability Federation Ireland. Assistive technology for people with disabilities and older people: a discussion paper. Dublin: Enable Ireland and Disability Federation Ireland; 2016.