End-user and clinician perspectives on the viability of wearable functional electrical stimulation garments after stroke and spinal cord injury

References

• Level N. Spinal cord injury facts and figures at a glance. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(6):620–621.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(1):27–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai SM, Studenski S, Duncan PW, et al. Persisting consequences of stroke measured by the stroke impact scale. Stroke. 2002;33(7):1840–1844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode RK, Heinemann AW. Course of functional improvement after stroke, spinal cord injury, and traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(1):100–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehn M, Kroll T. Staying physically active after spinal cord injury: a qualitative exploration of barriers and facilitators to exercise participation. BMC Public Health. 2009;9(1):168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Groot PCE, Hjeltnes N, Heijboer AC, et al. Effect of training intensity on physical capacity, lipid profile and insulin sensitivity in early rehabilitation of spinal cord injured individuals. Spinal Cord. 2003;41(12):673–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panisset MG, Galea MP, El-Ansary D. Does early exercise attenuate muscle atrophy or bone loss after spinal cord injury? Spinal Cord. 2016;54(2):84–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scivoletto G, Morganti B, Molinari M. Early versus delayed inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation: an Italian study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(3):512–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumida M, Fujimoto M, Tokuhiro A, et al. Early rehabilitation effect for traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(3):391–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris JE, Eng JJ, Miller WC, et al. A self-administered graded repetitive arm supplementary program (GRASP) improves arm function during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2009;40(6):2123–2128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maulden SA, Gassaway J, Horn SD, et al. Timing of initiation of rehabilitation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(12):34–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt J, Godecke E, Johnson L, et al. Early rehabilitation after stroke. Curr Opin Neurol. 2017;30(1):48–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho CH, Triolo RJ, Elias AL, et al. Functional electrical stimulation and spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014;25(3):631–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett OA, Lannin NA, Ada L, et al. Functional electrical stimulation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(5):934–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin R, Sadowsky C, Obst K, et al. Functional electrical stimulation in spinal cord injury: from theory to practice. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2012;18(1):28–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giangregorio L, Craven C, Richards K, et al. A randomized trial of functional electrical stimulation for walking in incomplete spinal cord injury: effects on body composition. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35(5):351–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frotzler A, Coupaud S, Perret C, et al. High-volume FES-cycling partially reverses bone loss in people with chronic spinal cord injury. Bone. 2008;43(1):169–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granat MH, Ferguson AC, Andrews BJ, et al. The role of functional electrical stimulation in the rehabilitation of patients with incomplete spinal cord injury-observed benefits during gait studies. Paraplegia. 1993;31(4):207–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baldi JC, Jackson RD, Moraille R, et al. Muscle atrophy is prevented in patients with acute spinal cord injury using functional electrical stimulation. Spinal Cord. 1998;36(7):463–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima N, Popovic MR, Zivanovic V. Effect of intensive functional electrical stimulation therapy on upper-limb motor recovery after stroke: Case study of a patient with chronic stroke. Physiother Can. 2013;65(1):20–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alon G, Levitt AF, McCarthy PA. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) may modify the poor prognosis of stroke survivors with severe motor loss of the upper extremity: a preliminary study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil/Assoc Acad Physiatr. 2008;87(8):627–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glanz M, Klawansky S, Stason W, et al. Functional electrostimulation in poststroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(6):549–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly JJ, Zimbelman J, Roenigk KL, et al. Recovery of coordinated gait: randomized controlled stroke trial of Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) versus No FES, with Weight-Supported treadmill and Over-Ground training. Neurorehab Neural Re. 2011;25(7):588–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan T, Hui-Chan CWY, Li L. Functional electrical stimulation improves motor recovery of the lower extremity and walking ability of subjects with first acute stroke: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Stroke. 2005;36(1):80–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auchstaetter N, Luc J, Lukye S, et al. Physical therapists’ use of functional electrical stimulation for clients with stroke: frequency, barriers, and facilitators. Phys Ther. 2016;96(7):995–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsou AD, Moreno JC, del Ama AJ,et al. Advances in selective activation of muscles for non-invasive motor neuroprostheses. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13(1):56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alon G, Levitt AF, McCarthy PA. Functional electrical stimulation enhancement of upper extremity functional recovery during stroke rehabilitation: a pilot study. Neurorehab Neural Re. 2007;21(3):207–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailes AF, Caldwell C, Clay M, et al. An exploratory study of gait and functional outcomes after neuroprosthesis use in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;8288:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Venugopalan L, Taylor PN, Cobb JE, et al. Upper limb functional electrical stimulation devices and their man-machine interfaces. J Med Eng Technol. 2015;39(8):471–479.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takeda K, Tanino G, Miyasaka H. Review of devices used in neuromuscular electrical stimulation for stroke rehabilitation. MDER. 2017;10:207–213.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan-Hall MK, Burridge J, Dibb B, et al. The views of people with spinal cord injury about the use of functional electrical stimulation. Artif Organs. 2011;35(3):204–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moineau B, Marquez-Chin C, Alizadeh-Meghrazi M, et al. Garments for functional electrical stimulation: Design and proofs of concept. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2019;6:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moineau B, Marquez-Chin C, Alizadeh-Meghrazi M, et al. Design of garment devices to deliver functional electrical stimulation in individuals with neurological paralysis In: 21st Annual Conference of the International FES Society. London, UK; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Moineau B, Alizadeh-Meghrazi M, Marquez-Chin C, et al. FES-therapy delivered with a stimulation garment : a first case-study training grasp after SCI In: 22nd Annual Conference of the International FES Society. Nottwil, Switzerland; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Demers L, Wessels R, Weiss-Lambrou R, et al. Key dimensions of client satisfaction with assistive technology: a cross-validation of a Canadian measure in The Netherlands. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33(4):187–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batavia AI, Hammer GS. Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices. JRRD. 1990;27(4):425–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shah SGS, Robinson I, AlShawi S. Developing medical device technologies from users’ perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development process. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25(4):514–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French JS, Anderson-Erisman KD, Sutter M. What do spinal cord injury consumers want? A review of spinal cord injury consumer priorities and neuroprosthesis from the 2008 neural interfaces conference. Neuromodulation. 2010;13(3):229–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson CR, De Angeli A. Applying user centred and participatory design approaches to commercial product development. Des Stud. 2014;35(6):614–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan D. Focus groups. Annu Rev Sociol. 1996;22(1):129–152. (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabiee F. Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004;63(4):655–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie AJ, Dickinson WB, Leech NL, et al. Toward more rigor in focus group research: a new framework for collecting and analyzing focus group data. Int J Qual Methods. 2009;8(3):1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M, Caelli K, Ray L, et al. Focus on research method: whatever happend to qualitative description. Res Nurs Health. 2000;2(23):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Pedrocchi A, Ferrante S, Ambrosini E, et al. MUNDUS project: MUltimodal neuroprosthesis for daily upper limb support. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2013;10(1):1–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coenen M, Stamm TA, Stucki G, et al. Individual interviews and focus groups in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of two qualitative methods. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(2):359–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Research design Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. (Axelsen DE, ed). Lincoln, UK: Sage Publication; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Keith R, Granger C, Hamilton B, et al. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). WHOQOL-BREF: introduction, administration, scoring and generic version of the assessment: Field Trial Version. Program on Mental Health - Worl Health Organization. 1996;1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boninger M, French J, Abbas J, et al. Technology for mobility in SCI 10 years from now. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(5):358–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musselman KE, Shah M, Zariffa J. Rehabilitation technologies and interventions for individuals with spinal cord injury: translational potential of current trends. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2018;15(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Hsieh JTC, et al. The health and life priorities of individuals with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(8):1548–1555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langan J, Subryan H, Nwogu I, et al. Reported use of technology in stroke rehabilitation by physical and occupational therapists. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(7):641–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr A, Smith M, Reid L, et al. Adoption of stroke rehabilitation technologies by the user community: Qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(8):1–6.
   Google Scholar