A pilot study on the electrophysiological monitoring of patient’s engagement in post-stroke physical rehabilitation

References

• Dijkers MP, Murphy SL, Krellman J. Evidence-based practice for rehabilitation professionals: concepts and controversies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(8):S164–S176.
   Google Scholar
• Lequerica AH, Donnell CS, Tate DG. Patient’s engagement in rehabilitation therapy: physical and occupational therapist impressions. Dis Rehabil. 2009;31(9):753–760.
   Google Scholar
• Pyöriä O, Talvitie U, Nyrkkö H, et al. The effect of two physiotherapy approaches on physical and cognitive functions and independent coping at home in stroke rehabilitation. A preliminary follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(6):503–511.
   Google Scholar
• Paolucci S, Di AV, Massicci R, et al. Impact of participation on rehabilitation results: a multivariate study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2012;48(3):455–466.
   Google Scholar
• Bright FA, Kayes NM, Worrall L, et al. A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(8):643–654.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo R, Pisano F, Mazzone A, et al. Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007;4(1):3.
   Google Scholar
• Horton S, Howell A, Humby K, et al. Engagement and learning: an exploratory study of situated practice in multi-disciplinary stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(3):270–279.
   Google Scholar
• Blank AA, French JA, Pehlivan AU, et al. Current trends in robot-assisted upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: promoting patient’s engagement in therapy. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2014;2(3):184–195.
   Google Scholar
• Danzl MM, Etter NM, Andreatta RD, et al. Facilitating neurorehabilitation through principles of engagement. J Allied Health. 2012;41(1):35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Jueptner M, Stephan KM, Frith CD, et al. Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77(3):1313–1324.
   Google Scholar
• Conte A, Gilio F, Iezzi E, et al. Attention influences the excitability of cortical motor areas in healthy humans. Exp Brain Res. 2007;182(1):109–117.
   Google Scholar
• Stefan K, Wycislo M, Classen J. Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92(1):66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Shahaf G, Reches A, Pinchuk N, et al. Introducing a novel approach of network oriented analysis of ERPs, demonstrated on adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123(8):1568–1580.
   Google Scholar
• Shahaf G, Fisher T, Aharon-Peretz J, et al. Comprehensive analysis suggests simple processes underlying EEG/ERP–demonstration with the go/no-go paradigm in ADHD. J Neurosci Methods. 2015;239:183–193.
   Google Scholar
• Park W, Kwon GH, Kim DH, et al. Assessment of cognitive engagement in stroke patients from single-trial EEG during motor rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015;23(3):351–362.
   Google Scholar
• Tacchino G, Gandolla M, Coelli S, et al. EEG Analysis during active and assisted repetitive movements: evidence for differences in neural engagement. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017;25(6):761–771.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfine AM, Schiff ND. What is the role of brain mechanisms underlying arousal in recovery of motor function after structural brain injuries? Curr Opin Neurol. 2011;24(6):564.
   Google Scholar
• Shahaf G, Yariv S, Bloch B, et al. A pilot study of possible easy-to-use electrophysiological index for early detection of antidepressive treatment non-response. Front Psychiatry. 2017;8:128.
   Google Scholar
• Isserles M, Daskalakis ZJ, George MS, et al. Simple electroencephalographic treatment-emergent marker can predict repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation antidepressant response—a feasibility study. J ECT. 2018;34(4):274.
   Google Scholar
• Shahaf G, Kuperman P, Bloch Y, et al. Monitoring migraine cycle dynamics with an easy-to-use electrophysiological marker—a pilot study. Sensors. 2018;18(11):3918.
   Google Scholar
• Shahafarun G, Nitzan U, Erez G, et al. Monitoring Attention in ADHD with an Easy-to-Use Electrophysiological Index. Front Hum Neurosci.. 2018;12:32.
   Google Scholar
• Bartur G, Joubran K, Peleg-Shani S, et al. An EEG tool for monitoring patient’s engagement during stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study. BioMed Res Int. 2017;2017:1.
   Google Scholar
• Shahaf G, Pratt H. Thorough specification of the neurophysiologic processes underlying behavior and of their manifestation in EEG–demonstration with the go/no-go task. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:305.
   Google Scholar
• Solana J, Cáceres C, García-Molina A, et al. Intelligent Therapy Assistant (ITA) for cognitive rehabilitation in patients with acquired brain injury. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014;14(1):58.
   Google Scholar
• Altschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L, et al. Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet. 1999;353(9169):2035–2036.
   Google Scholar
• Rettke H, Geschwindner HM, van den Heuvel WJ. Assessment of patient participation in physical rehabilitation activities: an integrative review. Rehabil Nurs. 2015;40(4):209–223.
   Google Scholar
• Seel RT, Corrigan JD, Dijkers MP, et al. Patient effort in traumatic brain injury inpatient rehabilitation: course and associations with age, brain injury severity, and time postinjury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(8):S235–S244.
   Google Scholar
• Lequerica AH, Rapport LJ, Whitman RD, et al. Psychometric properties of the rehabilitation therapy engagement scale when used among individuals with acquired brain injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2006;51(4):331.
   Google Scholar
• Whyte J, Hart T. It’s more than a black box; it’sa Russian doll: defining rehabilitation treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(8):639–652.
   Google Scholar
• Ratti E, Waninger S, Berka C, et al. Comparison of medical and consumer wireless EEG systems for use in clinical trials. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:398.
   Google Scholar
• Carmeli E, Peleg S, Bartur G, et al. HandTutorTM enhanced hand rehabilitation after stroke—a pilot study. Physiother Res Int. 2011;16(4):191–200.
   Google Scholar