User-centred assistive technology assessment of a portable open-area body weight support system for in-home use

References

• Gustafson GE. Effects of the ability to locomote on infants’ social and exploratory behaviors: an experimental study. Dev Psychol. 1984;20(3):397–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw J, Klaiman C, Gillespie S, et al. Walking ability is associated with social communication skills in infants at high risk for autism spectrum disorder. Infancy. 2018;23(5):674–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson JM. Developing language in a developing body: the relationship between motor development and language development. J Child Lang. 2010;37(2):229–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walle EA, Campos JJ. Infant language development is related to the acquisition of walking. Dev Psychol. 2014;50(2):336–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos JJ, Anderson DI, Barbu-Roth MA, et al. Travel broadens the mind. Infancy. 2000;1(2):149–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox SE, Levitt P, Nelson CA. How the timing and quality of early experiences influence the development of brain architecture. Child Dev. 2010;81(1):28–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen EI. Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004;16(8):1412–1425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karasik LB, Tamis-LeMonda CS, Adolph KE. Transition from crawling to walking and infants' actions with objects and people. Child development. 2011;82(4):1199–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge S. Family-centered assistive technology assessment and intervention practices for early intervention. Infants Young Child. 2002;15(1):60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weightman APH, Preston N, Holt R, et al. Engaging children in healthcare technology design: developing rehabilitation technology for children with cerebral palsy. J Eng Des. 2010;21(5):579–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damiano DL, DeJong SL. A systematic review of the effectiveness of treadmill training and body weight support in pediatric rehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009;33:27–44. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cin20&AN=105494477&site=ehost-live&scope=site
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldner HA, Logan SW, Galloway JC. Why the time is right for a radical paradigm shift in early powered mobility: the role of powered mobility technology devices, policy and stakeholders. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;3107:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich DA, Ulrich BD, Angulo-Kinzler RM, et al. Treadmill training of infants with down syndrome: evidence-based developmental outcomes. Pediatrics. 2001;108(5):e84– e87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot JF, Takken T, van Brussel M, et al. Randomized controlled study of home-based treadmill training for ambulatory children with Spina Bifida. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(7):597–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich DA, Lloyd MC, Tiernan CW, et al. Effects of intensity of treadmill training on developmental outcomes and stepping in infants with Down syndrome: a randomized trial. Phys Ther. 2008;88(1):114–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosser LA, Ohlrich LB, Curatalo LA, et al. Feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a novel mobility training intervention in infants and toddlers with cerebral palsy. Dev Neurorehabil. 2012;15(4):259–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokkoni E, Logan SW, Stoner T, et al. Use of an in-home body weight support system by a child with Spina Bifida. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2018;30(3):E1–E6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge S. Family-centered assistive technology assessment and intervention practices for early intervention. Infants Young Child. 2002;15(1):60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brotherson MJ, Cook CC, Parette HP. A home-centered approach to assistive technology provision for young children with disabilities. Focus Autism Other Dev Disabl. 1996;11(2):86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assist Technol. 1993;5(1):36–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sugawara AT, Ramos VD, Alfieri FM, et al. Abandonment of assistive products: assessing abandonment levels and factors that impact on it. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(7):716–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federici S, Meloni F, Borsci S. The abandonment of assistive technology in Italy: a survey of National Health Service users. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;52(4):516–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Development of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 1996;8(1):3–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Read J, Macfarlane S, Casey C. Endurability, engagement and expectations: measuring children’ s fun. Interact Des Child. 2002;2:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bamm EL, Rosenbaum P. Family-centered theory: origins, development, barriers, and supports to implementation in rehabilitation medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(8):1618–1624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff J, Parker C, Borisoff J, et al. A survey of stakeholder perspectives on exoskeleton technology. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2014;11:169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein J, Wagner AR, Howard A. Overtrust of pediatric health-care robots: a preliminary survey of parent perspectives. IEEE Robot Automat Mag. 2018;25(1):46–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health. Rehabilitative and Assistive Technology. [Internet]. 2018. [cited 2019 Sep 4]. Available from: http://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/rehabtech
   Google Scholar
• Fetters L. Perspective on variability in the development of human action. Phys Ther. 2010;90(12):1860–1867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadders-Algra M. Early human motor development: from variation to the ability to vary and adapt. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;90:411–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan C, Novak I, Dale RC, et al. Optimising motor learning in infants at high risk of cerebral palsy: a pilot study. BMC Pediatr. 2015;15(1):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gannotti ME, Christy JB, Heathcock JC, et al. A path model for evaluating dosing parameters for children with cerebral palsy. Phys Ther. 2014;94(3):411–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannotti ME. Coupling timing of interventions with dose to optimize plasticity and participation in pediatric neurologic populations. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2017;29:S37–S47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cioni G, Inguaggiato E, Sgandurra G. Early intervention in neurodevelopmental disorders: underlying neural mechanisms. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:61–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney G, Robinson C, Perales F. Early motor intervention; the need for new treatment paradigms. Infants Young Child. 2004;17(4):291–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadders-Algra M. Early diagnosis and early intervention in cerebral palsy. Front Neurol. 2014;5:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott A, Bartlett D. The relationship between the home environment and early motor development. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1999;19(1):43–57.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd M, Burghardt A, Ulrich DA, et al. Physical activity and walking onset in infants with down syndrome. Adapt Phys Act Q. 2010;27:1–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar