Robot applications for autism: a comprehensive review

References

• Scassellati B, Admoni H, Matarić M. Robots for use in autism research. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;14(1):275–294.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sartorato F, Przybylowski L, Sarko DK. Improving therapeutic outcomes in autism spectrum disorders: enhancing social communication and sensory processing through the use of interactive robots. J Psychiatr Res. 2017;90:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diehl JJ, Schmitt LM, Villano M, et al. The clinical use of robots for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a critical review. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2012;6(1):249–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennisi P, Tonacci A, Tartarisco G, et al. Autism and social robotics: a systematic review. Autism Res. 2016;9(2):165–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provoost S, Lau HM, Ruwaard J, et al. Embodied conversational agents in clinical psychology: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(5):e151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begum M, Serna RW, Yanco HA. Are robots ready to deliver autism interventions? A comprehensive review. Int J Soc Robot. 2016;8(2):157–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aresti-Bartolome N, Garcia-Zapirain B. Technologies as support tools for persons with autistic spectrum disorder: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(8):7767–7802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainer J, Robins B, Amirabdollahian F, et al. Using the humanoid robot KASPAR to autonomously play triadic games and facilitate collaborative play among children with autism. IEEE Trans Auton Mental Dev. 2014;6(3):183–199.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda S, Nunez E, Hirokawa M, et al. Facilitating social play for children with PDDs: effects of paired robotic devices. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradel G, Dansart P, Puret A, et al. Generating interactions in autistic spectrum disorders by means of a mobile robot. IECON Proceedings (Industrial Electronics Conference); 2010 Nov 7–10, Glendale, AZ, USA. p. 1540–1545.
   Google Scholar
• Yun S-S, Kim H, Choi J, et al. A robot-assisted behavioral intervention system for children with autism spectrum disorders. Rob Auton Syst. 2016;76:58–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez F, Yoshikawa T, Furuhashi T, et al. Feasibility of collaborative learning and work between robots and children with autism spectrum disorders. New Front Artif Intelligence. 2017;10247:454–461.
   Google Scholar
• Liu C, Conn K, Sarkar N, et al. Online affect detection and robot behavior adaptation for intervention of children with autism. IEEE Trans Robot. 2008;24(4):883–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feil-Seifer D, Mataric M. Automated detection and classification of positive vs. negative robot interactions with children with autism using distance-based features. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction – HRI; 2011 Mar 8–11, Laussane, Switzerland. p. 323–330.
   Google Scholar
• Rudovic O, Lee J, Mascarell-Maricic L, et al. Measuring engagement in robot-assisted autism therapy: a cross-cultural study. Front Robot AI. 2017;4:36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsuddin S, Yussof H, Ismail LI, et al. Humanoid robot NAO interacting with autistic children of moderately impaired intelligence to augment communication skills. Proc Eng. 2012;41:1533–1538.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail LI, Shamsudin S, Yussof H, et al. Estimation of concentration by eye contact measurement in robot-based intervention program with autistic children. Proc Eng. 2012;41:1548–1552.
   Google Scholar
• Yin T, Tung F. Design and evaluation of applying robots to assisting and inducing children with autism in social interaction. Hum Comput Interact. 2013;7:524–533.
   Google Scholar
• Miskam MA, Hamid MAC, Yussof H, et al. Study on social interaction between children with autism and humanoid robot NAO. J Appl Mech Mater. 2013;393:573–578.
   Google Scholar
• Shamsuddin S, Yussof H, Hanapiah FA, et al. Response of children with autism to robotic intervention and association with IQ levels. 4th Joint IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning and on Epigenetic Robotics; 2014 Oct 13–16, Genoa, Italy. p. 387–393.
   Google Scholar
• Petric F, Miklic D, Kovacic Z. Robot-assisted autism spectrum disorder diagnostics using POMDPs. Proceedings of the Companion of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction – HRI ’17; 2017 Mar 6–9, Vienna, Austria. p. 369–370.
   Google Scholar
• Costa S, Soares F, Santos C. Facial expressions and gestures to convey emotions with a humanoid robot. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2013;8239:542–551.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JC, Azzi P, Jeon M, et al. Audio-based emotion estimation for interactive robotic therapy for children with autism spectrum disorder. 14th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI); 2017 Jun 28–Jul 1, Jeju, South Korea. p. 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei D, Greco A, Lazzeri N, et al. Robotic social, therapy on children with autism: preliminary evaluation through multi-parametric analysis. IEEE International Conference on Social Computing and IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust; 2012 Sep 3–5, Amsterdam, Netherlands. p. 766–771.
   Google Scholar
• Giannopulu I, Pradel G. From child–robot interaction to child–robot–therapist interaction: a case study in autism. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2012;9(2):173–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barakova EI, Lourens T. Expressing and interpreting emotional movements in social games with robots. Pers Ubiquit Comput. 2010;14(5):457–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa S, Soares F, Pereira AP, et al. Building a game scenario to encourage children with autism to recognize and label emotions using a humanoid robot. 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2014 Aug 25–29, Edinburgh, UK. p. 820–825.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrova M, Vegt N, Barakova E. Designing a system of interactive robots for training collaborative skills to autistic children. 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning, ICL, Sept 26–28, Villach, Austria. 2012. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Giannopulu I, Montreynaud V, Watanabe T. Neurotypical and autistic children aged 6 to 7 years in a speaker-listener situation with a human or a minimalist InterActor robot. The 23rd IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Aug 25–29, Edinburgh, UK. 2014. p. 942–948.
   Google Scholar
• Koch SA, Stevens CE, Clesi CD, et al. A feasibility study evaluating the emotionally expressive robot SAM. Int J Soc Robot. 2017;9(4):601–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonarini A, Clasadonte F, Garzotto F, et al. Playful interaction with Teo, a mobile robot for children with neurodevelopmental disorders. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion – DSAI 2016, Vila Real, Portugal. 2016. p. 223–231.
   Google Scholar
• Silva V, Soares F, Esteves JS. Mirroring and recognizing emotions through facial expressions for a RoboKind platform. IEEE 5th Portuguese Meeting on Bioengineering (ENBENG); Feb 16–18, Coimbra, Portugal. 2017. p. 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Nunez E, Matsuda S, Hirokawa M, et al. Paired robotic devices to mediate and represent social behaviors. Proceedings of the 24th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; Aug 31–Sep 4, 2015. p. 722–727.
   Google Scholar
• Nunez E, Matsuda S, Hirokawa M, et al. An approach to facilitate turn-taking behavior with paired devices for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN; Aug 26–31, New York, NY, USA. 2016. p. 837–842.
   Google Scholar
• Kose-Bagci H, Dautenhahn K, Nehaniv CL. Emergent dynamics of turn-taking interaction in drumming games with a humanoid robot. Proc. 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication RO-MAN; Aug 1–3, Munich, Germany. 2008. p. 346–353.
   Google Scholar
• Hatice Kose G, Akalin N, Yorganci R, et al. iSign: an architecture for humanoid assisted sign language tutoring. Intelligent Assistive Robots. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. Vol. 106. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 157–184.
   Google Scholar
• Kirstein F, Risager RV. Social robots in educational institutions they came to stay: introducing, evaluating, and securing social robots in daily education. 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI); 2016. p. 453–454.
   Google Scholar
• Alahbabi M, Almazroei F, Almarzoqi M, et al. Avatar based interaction therapy: a potential therapeutic approach for children with autism. Proceedings from the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), Aug 6–9, Takamatsu, Japan; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Palestra G, Varni G, Chetouani M, et al. A multimodal and multilevel system for robotics treatment of autism in children. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Social Learning and Multimodal Interaction for Designing Artificial Agents – DAA ’16; 2016. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Anzalone SM, Tanet A, Pallanca O, et al. A humanoid robot controlled by neurofeedback to reinforce attention in autism spectrum disorder. CEUR Workshop Proc. 2017;1834:61–67.
   Google Scholar
• Kajopoulos J, Wong AHY, Yuen AWC, et al. Robot-assisted training of joint attention skills in children diagnosed with autism. International Conference on Social Robotics; Oct 26–30, Paris, France. 2015. p. 296–305.
   Google Scholar
• Colton MB, Ricks DJ, Goodrich MA, et al. Toward therapist-in-the-loop assistive robotics for children with autism and specific language impairment. AISB New Frontiers in Human–Robot Interaction Symposium; 2009. p. 25.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Zhang L, Bekele E, et al. Impact of robot-mediated interaction system on joint attention skills for children with autism. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; 2013 Jun 24–26, Seattle, WA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Breazeal C, Dautenhahn K, Kanda T. Longitudinal impact of autonomous robot-mediated joint attention intervention for young children with ASD. International Conference on Social Robotics; Nov 1–3, Kansas City, USA. 2016. p. 1935–1972.
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier P, Martin JC, Isableu B, et al. Joint attention using human–robot interaction: impact of sensory preferences of children with autism. 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN; 2016 Aug 26–31, New York, NY, USA. p. 849–854.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva PRS, Tadano K, Saito A, et al. The development of an assistive robot for improving the joint attention of autistic children. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR; 2009 Jun 23–26, Kyoto, Japan. p. 694–700.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva PRS, Tadano K, Saito A, et al. Therapeutic-assisted robot for children with autism. EEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS; 2009 Oct 11–15, St. Louis, MO, USA. p. 3561–3567.
   Google Scholar
• Bekele E, Lahiri U, Davidson J, et al. Development of a novel robot-mediated adaptive response system for joint attention task for children with autism. I20th EEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2011 Jul 31–Aug, 3, Atlanta, GA, USA. p. 276–281.
   Google Scholar
• Bekele ET, Lahiri U, Swanson AR, et al. A step towards developing adaptive robot-mediated intervention architecture (ARIA) for children with autism. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013;21(2):289–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damm O, Malchus K, Jaecks P, et al. Different gaze behavior in human–robot interaction in Asperger’s syndrome: an eye-tracking study. Proceedings from the 2013 IEEE RO-MAN, Aug 26–29, Gyeongju, South Korea; 2013. p. 13–14.
   Google Scholar
• Standen P, Brown DJ, Roscoe J, et al. Engaging students with profound and multiple disabilities using humanoid robots. Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction. Universal Access to Information and Knowledge. SE – 39. Vol. 8514; 2014. p. 419–430.
   Google Scholar
• Hirokawa M, Funahashi A, Itoh Y, et al. A doll-type interface for real-time humanoid teleoperation in robot-assisted activity. IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction – HRI ’14; 2014 Mar 3–6, Bielefeld, Germany. p. 174–175.
   Google Scholar
• Mead R, Matarić MJ. The power of suggestion: teaching sequences though assistive robot motions. 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction – HRI; 2009 Mar 11–13, La Jolla, CA, USA. p. 317.
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier P, Raiola G, Martin J, et al. Do sensory preferences of children with autism impact an imitation task with a robot? Proc. 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction – HRI ’17, March 6–9, Vienna, Austria; 2017. p. 177–186.
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Zhou X, Liu C, et al. An interactive training system of motor learning by imitation and speech instructions for children with autism. Proceedings of the 2016 9th International Conference on Human Systems Interaction HSI 2016, July6–8, Portsmouth, UK; 2016. p. 56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Peng YH, Lin CW, Mayer NM, et al. Using a humanoid robot for music therapy with autistic children. CACS 2014 – 2014 International Automatic Control Conference, Nov 26–28, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 2014. p. 156–160.
   Google Scholar
• Ranatunga I, Beltran M, Torres NA, et al. Human–robot upper body gesture imitation analysis for autism spectrum disorders. Lecture Notes in Computer Science; 2013. p. 218–228.
   Google Scholar
• Kose H, Akalin N, Uluer P. Socially interactive robotic platforms as sign language tutors. Int J Humanoid Robot. 2014;11(01):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Moorthy RS, Pugazhenthi S. Imitation based training to enhance psychomotor skills in autistic children using a snatcher robot. International Conference on Robotics and Automation for Humanitarian Applications, RAHA; 2017 Dec 13–20, Kollam, India. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Greczek J, Atrash A, Matari M. A computational model of graded cueing: robots encouraging behavior change. Commun Comput Inf Sci. 2013;374(Pt II):582–586.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Das S, Young EM, et al. Autonomous robot-mediated imitation learning for children with autism. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 31–Jun 7, Hong Kong, China; 2014. p. 2707–2712.
   Google Scholar
• Chou C, Chu Y, Chen H. A Mandarin phonetic-symbol communication aid developed on tablet computers for children with high-functioning autism. J Appl Sci Eng. 2017;20(2):251–258.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Young EM, Swanson AR, et al. Robot-mediated imitation skill training for children with autism. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2016;24(6):682–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanton CM, Kahn PH Jr., Severson RL, et al. Robotic animals might aid in the social development of children with autism. HRI ’08: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, Mar 12–15, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 2008. p. 271–278.
   Google Scholar
• Golestan S, Soleiman P, Moradi H. Feasibility of using sphero in rehabilitation of children with autism in social and communication skills. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2017. 2017:989–994.
   Google Scholar
• Sakka S, Gaboriau R, Picard J, et al. Rob’autism: how to change autistic social skills in 20 weeks. Mech Mach Sci. 2018;48:261–274.
   Google Scholar
• Giannopulu I, Montreynaud V, Watanabe T. Minimalistic toy robot to analyze a scenery of speaker–listener condition in autism. Cogn Process. 2016;17(2):195–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzei D, Lazzeri N, Hanson D, et al. HEFES: an hybrid engine for facial expressions synthesis to control human-like androids and avatars. Proceedings of the IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics; 2012 Jun 24–27, Rome, Italy. p. 195–200.
   Google Scholar
• Lee H, Hyun E. The intelligent robot contents for children with speech-language disorder. Educ Technol Soc. 2015;18(3):100–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimaya J, Yoshikawa Y, Matsumoto Y, et al. Advantages of indirect conversation via a desktop humanoid robot: case study on daily life guidance for adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-Man; 2016 Aug 26–31, New York, NY. p. 831–836.
   Google Scholar
• Garzotto F, Gelsomini M, Kinoe Y. Puffy: a mobile inflatable interactive companion for children with neurodevelopmental disorder. IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Sep 25–29, Bombay, India.; 2017. p. 467–492.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki R, Lee J. Robot-play therapy for improving prosocial behaviours in children with autism spectrum disorders. International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science, MHS; 2017 Nov 28–30, Nagoya, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Bharatharaj J, Huang L, Mohan R, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for learning and social interaction of children with autism spectrum disorder. Robotics. 2017;6(1):4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccanfuso L, Scarborough S, Abramson RK, et al. A low-cost socially assistive robot and robot-assisted intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder: field trials and lessons learned. Auton Robot. 2017;41(3):637–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzei D, Billeci L, Armato A, et al. The FACE of autism. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2010 Sep 12–15. p. 791–796.
   Google Scholar
• Kumazaki H, Yoshikawa Y, Matsumoto Y, et al. An intervention for children with social anxiety and autism spectrum disorders using an android robot. JSAI International Symposium of Artificial Intelligence. Nov 13–15, Tsukuba, Japan; 2017. p. 470–477.
   Google Scholar
• So WC, Wong MKY, Cabibihan JJ, et al. Using robot animation to promote gestural skills in children with autism spectrum disorders. J Comput Assist Learn. 2016;32(6):632–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marti P, Giusti L. A robot companion for inclusive games: a user-centred design perspective. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation Anchorage Convention District; 2010 May 3–8; Anchorage, Alaska, USA; 2010. p. 4348–4353.
   Google Scholar
• Andrea B, Bennedeto A. Effects of collaborative learning between educational-support robots and children who potential symptoms of a development disability. 8th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems and 17th International Symposium on Advanced Intelligent Systems. Vol. 57; 2016 Aug 25–28, Sapporo, Japan. p. 101–131.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki R, Lee J, Rudovic O. NAO-dance therapy for children with ASD. Proceedings of the Companion 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction – HRI ’17; 2017. p. 295–296.
   Google Scholar
• Tennyson MF, Kuester DA, Casteel J, et al. Accessible robots for improving social skills of individuals with autism as an intervention for individuals. J Artif Intell Soft Comput Res. 2016;6(4):267–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaf J, Preston AS, Richter DC, et al. An undergraduate service learning research project using a humanoid robot to enhance treatment for children with autism spectrum disorder. SEE Annual Conference & Exposition; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Barakova EI, Bajracharya P, Willemsen M, et al. Long-term LEGO therapy with humanoid robot for children with ASD. Expert Syst. 2015;32(6):698–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulos C, Kuester D, Sheehan M, et al. Socially assistive robots and autism. Solid State Phenomena. 2010;166–167:315–320.
   Google Scholar
• Villano M, Crowell C, Wier KG, et al. DOMER: a wizard of Oz interface for using interactive robots to scaffold social skills for children with autism spectrum disorders. 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction (HRI); 2011 Mar 8–11, Laussane, Switzerland. p. 279–280.
   Google Scholar
• Ertuğrul BS, Gurpinar C, Kivrak H, et al. Insansı Robot destekli Interaktif İşaret Dili Eğitimi için İşaret Tanıma [Gesture Recognition for Humanoid Assisted Interactive Sign Language Tutoring]. Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU); 2013 Apr 24–26, Haspolat, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Hirokawa M, Funahashi A, Itoh Y, et al. Design of affective robot-assisted activity for children with autism spectrum disorders. The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2014 Aug 25–29, Edinburgh, UK. p. 365–370.
   Google Scholar
• Shamsuddin S, Yussof H, Hanapiah FA, et al. Robot-assisted learning for communication-care in autism intervention. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; 2015 Aug 11–14. p. 822–827.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuda ENB,S, Hirokawa M, Suzuki K. Humanoid robot assisted training for facial expressions recognition based on affective feedback. In: Tapus A, André E, Martin JC, et al., editors. Social Robotics. ICSR. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 9388. Cham: Springer; 2015. p. 492–501.
   Google Scholar
• Galán-Mena J, Ávila G, Pauta-Pintado J, et al. An intelligent system based on ontologies and ICT tools to support the diagnosis and intervention of children with autism. IEEE Biennial Congress of Argentina; 2016 Jun 15–17, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
   Google Scholar
• Li C, Jia Q, Feng Y. Human–robot interaction design for robot-assisted intervention for children with autism based on E-S theory. 8th International Conference on Intelligent Human–Machine Systems and Cybernetics, IHMSC. Vol. 2; 2016 Aug 27–28, Huangzou, China. p. 320–324.
   Google Scholar
• De Haas M, Smeekens I, Mwangi EN, et al. Personalizing educational game play with a robot partner. Robot Educ Adv Intell Syst Comput. 2017;457:259–270.
   Google Scholar
• Moorthy RS, Pugazhenthi S. Teaching psychomotor skills to autistic children by employing a robotic training kit: a pilot study. Int J Soc Robot. 2017;9(1):97–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharatharaj J, Huang L, Al-Jumaily AM, et al. Experimental evaluation of parrot-inspired robot and adapted model-rival method for teaching children with autism. 14th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision, ICARCV; 2016 Nov 13–15, Phuket, Thailand. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bharatharaj J, Huang L, Al-Jumaily AM, et al. Effects of adapted model-rival method and parrot-inspired robot in improving learning and social interaction among children with autism. International Conference on Robotics and Automation for Humanitarian Applications, RAHA; 2016 Dec 18–20. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Costa S, Santos C, Soares F, et al. Promoting interaction amongst autistic adolescents using robots. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc2010;2010 3856–3859.
   Google Scholar
• Robins B, Dautenhahn K. Developing play scenarios for tactile interaction with a humanoid robot: a case study exploration with children with autism. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2010;6414:243–252.
   Google Scholar
• Robins B, Amirabdollahian F, Dautenhahn K. Investigating child–robot tactile interactions: a taxonomical classification of tactile behaviour of children with autism towards a humanoid robot. The Sixth International Conference on Advances in Computer–Human Interactions; 2013 Feb 24–Mar 1. p. 89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Costa S, Soares FO, Santos CP, et al. An approach to promote social and communication behaviors in children with autism spectrum disorders: robot based intervention. Proceedings of the 20th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2011. p. 101–106.
   Google Scholar
• Ranatunga I, Rajruangrabin J, Popa DO, et al. Enhanced therapeutic interactivity using social robot Zeno. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments – PETRA ’11; 2011. p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Boccanfuso L, O’Kane JM. Adaptive Robot Design with Hand and Face Tracking for Use in Autism Therapy. International Conference on Social Robotics, Nov 23–24, Singapore2010. p. 265–274.
   Google Scholar
• Simut R, Pop C, Saldien J, et al. Is the social robot probo an added value for social story intervention for children with autism spectrum disorders? Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction; 2012 Mar 5–8. p. 235.
   Google Scholar
• Ranatunga I, Torres NA, Patterson R, et al. RoDiCA: a human–robot interaction system for treatment of childhood autism spectrum disorders. 5th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments. Vol. 3; 2012 Jun 6–8. p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J, Takehashi H, Nagai C, et al. Design of a therapeutic robot for interacting with autistic children through interpersonal touch. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2012 Sep 9–13. p. 712–717.
   Google Scholar
• Vanderborght B, Simut R, Saldien J, et al. Using the social robot probo as a social story telling agent for children with ASD. Interact Stud. 2012;13(3):348–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barakova EI, Gillesen JCC, Huskens BEBM, et al. End-user programming architecture facilitates the uptake of robots in social therapies. Rob Auton Syst. 2013;61(7):704–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Zhao Q, Liu Q, et al. A humanoid robot used as an assistive intervention tool for children with autism spectrum disorder. International Conference on Brain and Health Informatics, Oct 29–31, Maebashi, Japan; 2013. p. 336–347.
   Google Scholar
• Palestra G, Bortone I, Cazzato D, et al. Social robots in postural education: a new approach to address body consciousness in ASD children. Lect Notes Comput Sci. 2014;8755:290–299.
   Google Scholar
• Park HW, Howard AM. Robot learners: interactive instance-based learning and its application to therapeutic tasks. Artificial Intelligence for Human–Robot Interaction. AAAI Fall Symposium; 2014. p. 121–123.
   Google Scholar
• Andreae H, Andreae P, Low J, et al. A study of Auti: a socially assistive robotic toy. Interact Des Child. 2014:245–248.
   Google Scholar
• Lee BH, Jang J, Mun K, et al. Development of therapeutic expression for a cat robot in the treatment of autism spectrum disorders. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics; 2014. Vol. 02. p. 640–647.
   Google Scholar
• Mun KH, Kwon JY, Lee BH, et al. Design developing an early model of cat robot for the use of early treatment of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Int J Control Automat. 2014;7(11):59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Yun S-S, Park S-K, Choi J. A robotic treatment approach to promote social interaction skills for children with autism spectrum disorders. The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2014 Aug 25–29. p. 130–134.
   Google Scholar
• Robins B, Dautenhahn K. Tactile interactions with a humanoid robot: novel play scenario implementations with children with autism. Int J Soc Robot. 2014;6(3):397–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa S, Lehmann H, Dautenhahn K, et al. Using a humanoid robot to elicit body awareness and appropriate physical interaction in children with autism. Int J Soc Robot. 2015;7(2):265–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pistoia M, Pistoia M, Casacci P. ASTRO: autism support therapy by robot interaction. Lect Notes Electr Eng. 2017;426:303–309.
   Google Scholar
• Dickstein-Fischer LA, Pereira RH, Gandomi KY, et al. Interactive tracking for robot-assisted autism therapy. Proceedings of the Companion of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction – HRI ’17; 2017 Mar 6–9. p. 107–108.
   Google Scholar
• Alers S, Barakova EI. Multi-agent platform for development of educational games for children with autism. International IEEE Consumer Electronics Society’s Games Innovations Conference; 2009 Aug 25–28. p. 145–151.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas H, Costa P, Silva V, et al. Using a humanoid robot as the promoter of the interaction with children in the context of educational games. Int J Mechatron Appl Mech. 2017;1(1):282–288.
   Google Scholar
• Costa S, Resende J, Soares FO, et al. Applications of simple robots to encourage social receptiveness of adolescents with autism. 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS; 2009 Sep 2–6. p. 5072–5075.
   Google Scholar
• Proano L, Morales V, Danny P. Adaptation of the bioloid humanoid as an auxiliary in the treatment of autistic children. IT Converg Secur. 2018;449:256–266.
   Google Scholar
• Costa S, Lehmann H, Robins B, et al. Where is your nose? Developing body awareness skills among children with autism using a humanoid robot. Sixth International Conference on Advances in Computer–Human Interactions; 2013 Feb 24–Mar 1. p. 117–122.
   Google Scholar
• Yun SS, Choi J, Park SK. Robotic behavioral intervention to facilitate eye contact and reading emotions of children with autism spectrum disorders. 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN; 2016 Aug 26–31. p. 694–699.
   Google Scholar
• Silva S, Soares F, Costa S, et al. Development of skills in children with ASD using a robotic platform. IEEE 2nd Portuguese Meeting on Bioengineering ENBENG; 2012. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardo B, Alves-Oliveira P, Santos MG, et al. An interactive tangram game for children with autism. International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents; 2016. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Robles-Bykbaev V, Arévalo-Fernández C, Naranjo-Cabrera E, et al. A hybrid approach based on multi-sensory stimulation rooms robotic assistants and ontologies to provide support in the intervention of children with autism. International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. Vol. 477–487; 2018. p. 477–487.
   Google Scholar
• Özcan B, Caligiore D, Sperati V, et al. Transitional wearable companions: a novel concept of soft interactive social robots to improve social skills in children with autism spectrum disorder. Int J Soc Robot. 2016;8(4):471–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund HH, Pedersen MD, Beck R. Modular robotic tiles: experiments for children with autism. 13th International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics; 2009 Jan 31–Feb 2. p. 394–400.
   Google Scholar
• Robins B, Amirabdollahian F, Ji Z, et al. Tactile interaction with a humanoid robot for children with autism: a case study analysis from user requirements to implementation. 19th IEEE International Symposium in Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN); 2010 Sep 12–15. p. 704–711.
   Google Scholar
• Salter T, Davey N, Michaud F. Designing & developing QueBall, a robotic device for autism therapy. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2014 Aug 25–29. p. 574–579.
   Google Scholar
• Guneysu A, Siyli RD, Salah AA. Auto-evaluation of motion imitation in a child–robot imitation game for upper arm rehabilitation. 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2014 Aug 25–29. p. 199–204.
   Google Scholar
• Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Dickerson P. From isolation to communication: a case study evaluation of robot assisted play for children with autism with a minimally expressive humanoid robot. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computer–Human Interaction: ACHI’09; 2009. p. 205–211.
   Google Scholar
• Feil-Seifer DJ, Mataric MJ. Toward socially assistive robotics for augmenting interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. In: Khatib O, Kumar V and Pappas GJ, editors. Experimental Robotics. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics. Vol. 54, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. p. 201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Wainer J, Ferrari E, Dautenhahn K, et al. The effectiveness of using a robotics class to foster collaboration among groups of children with autism in an exploratory study. Pers Ubiquit Comput. 2010;14(5):445–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirabdollahian F, Robins B, Dautenhahn K, et al. Investigating tactile event recognition in child–robot interaction for use in autism therapy. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS; 2011 Aug 30–Sep 3. p. 5347–5351.
   Google Scholar
• Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Ferrari E, et al. Scenarios of robot-assisted play for children with cognitive and physical disabilities. Interact Stud. 2012;13(2):189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins B, Dautenhahn K, Dickerson P. Embodiment and cognitive learning – can a humanoid robot help children with autism to learn about tactile social behaviour? 4th International Conference on Social Robotics; 2012 Oct. p. 66–75.
   Google Scholar
• Bugnariu N, Garver C, Young C, et al. Human–robot interaction as a tool to evaluate and quantify motor imitation behavior in children with autism spectrum disorders. International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation (ICVR); 2013 Aug 26–29. p. 57–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lee J, Takehashi H, Nagai C, et al. Which robot features can stimulate better responses from children with autism in robot-assisted therapy? Int J Adv Robot Syst. 2012;9. DOI:10.5772/51128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakadoi Y. Usefulness of animal type robot assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorder in the child and adolescent psychiatric ward. New Front Artif Intell. 2017;10247:478–482.
   Google Scholar
• Costa SC, Soares FO, Pereira AP, et al. Constraints in the design of activities focusing on emotion recognition for children with ASD using robotic tools. 4th IEEE RAS and EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics; 2012 Jun 24–27. p. 1884–1889.
   Google Scholar
• Hirokawa M, Funahashi A, Pan Y, et al. Design of a robotic agent that measures smile and facing behavior of children with autism spectrum disorder. 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN; 2016 Aug 26–31. p. 843–848.
   Google Scholar
• Wijayasinghe IB, Ranatunga I, Balakrishnan N, et al. Human–robot gesture analysis for objective assessment of autism spectrum disorder. Int J Soc Robot. 2016;8(5):695–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YT, Wang YW, Wang HM. Intelligent robotic applied to social development assistant teaching system of autistic children. 5th International Symposium on Next-Generation Electronics, ISNE; 2016. p. 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier P, Martin JC, Isableu B, et al. Impact of sensory preferences of individuals with autism on the recognition of emotions expressed by two robots, an avatar, and a human. Auton Robot. 2017;41(3):613–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijnen C, Lexis M, de Witte L. Matching robot KASPAR to ASD therapy and educational goals. Int J Soc Robot. 2015;8(4):445–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosla R, Nguyen K, Chu MT. Service personalisation of assistive robot for autism care. IECON – 41st Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society; 2015 Nov 9–12. p. 2088–2093.
   Google Scholar
• Hashim R, Mahamood SF, Yussof H, et al. Using assistive technology for spiritual enhancement of brain-impaired children. Proc Comput Sci. 2015;76:355–359.
   Google Scholar
• Wainer J, Dautenhahn K, Robins B, et al. A pilot study with a novel setup for collaborative play of the humanoid robot KASPAR with children with autism. Int J Soc Robot. 2014;6(1):45–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannopulu I, Neuroscience C. Multimodal cognitive nonverbal and verbal interactions: the neurorehabilitation of autistic children via mobile toy robots. Int J Adv Life Sci. 2013;5(3).
   Google Scholar
• Cristina AP, Simut R, Pintea S, et al. Can the social robot probo help children with autism to identify situation-based emotions? A series of single case experiments. Int J Humanoid Robot. 2013;10(03):1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dickerson P, Robins B. Where the action is: a conversation analytic perspective on interaction between a humanoid robot, a co-present adult and a child with an ASD. Interact Stud. 2013;14(2):297–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pop CA, Simut RE, Pintea S, et al. Social robots vs. computer display: does the way social stories are delivered make a difference for their effectiveness on ASD children? J Educ Comput Res. 2013;49(3):381–401.
   Google Scholar
• Hoa TD, Cabibihan J-J. Cute and soft: baby steps in designing robots for children with autism. Proceedings of the Workshop at SIGGRAPH Asia on – WASA; 2012 Sep 9–13. p. 77.
   Google Scholar
• Wong A, Tan Y, Tay A, et al. A user trial study to understand play behaviors of autistic children using a social robot. Vol. 7621. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann H, Iacono I, Robins B, et al. ‘Make it move’: playing cause and effect games with a robot companion for children with cognitive disabilities. 29th Annual European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE’11); 2011 Aug 24–26. p. 105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Kim Y-D, Hong J-W, Kang W-S, et al. Design of robot assisted observation system for therapy and education of children with autism. Vol. 6414. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wainer J, Dautenhahn K, Robins B, et al. Collaborating with KASPAR: using an autonomous humanoid robot to foster cooperative dyadic play among children with autism. 10th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, Humanoids; 2010 Dec 6–8. p. 631–638.
   Google Scholar
• Coco MD, Leo M, Distante C, et al. Automatic emotion recognition in robot–children interaction for ASD treatment. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision; 2015 Dec 7–13. p. 537–545.
   Google Scholar
• Conti D, Nuovo SD, Buono S, et al. Use of robotics to stimulate imitation in children with autism spectrum disorder: a pilot study in a clinical setting. 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2015 Aug 31–Sep 4. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Qidwai U, Shakir M, Connor OB. Robotic toys for autistic children: innovative tools for teaching and treatment. 7th IEEE GCC Conference and Exhibition; 2013 Nov 17–20. p. 188–192.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzei D, Lazzeri N, Billeci L, et al. Development and evaluation of a social robot platform for therapy in autism. 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS; 2011 Aug 30–Sep 3. p. 4515–4518.
   Google Scholar
• Giullian N, Ricks D, Atherton A, et al. Detailed requirements for robots in autism therapy. IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics (SMC); 2010 Oct 10–13. p. 2595–2602.
   Google Scholar
• Feil-Seifer D. Using proxemics to evaluate human–robot interaction. 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human–Robot Interaction, HRI; 2010 Mar 2–5. p. 143–144.
   Google Scholar
• Duquette A, Michaud F, Mercier H. Exploring the use of a mobile robot as an imitation agent with children with low-functioning autism. Auton Robot. 2008;24(2):147–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapus A, Peca A, Aly A, et al. Children with autism social engagement in interaction with Nao, an imitative robot: a series of single case experiments. Interact Stud. 2012;13(3):315–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamsuddin S, Yussof H, Ismail LI, et al. Initial response in HRI – a case study on evaluation of child with autism spectrum disorders interacting with a humanoid robot NAO. Proc Eng. 2012;41:1448–1455.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail LI, Shamsudin S, Yussof H, et al. Robot-based intervention program for autistic children with humanoid robot NAO: initial response in stereotyped behavior. Int Symp Robot Intell Sens. 2012;41:1441–1447.
   Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Jia Q, Chu M, et al. Engagement evaluation for autism intervention by robots based on dynamic Bayesian network and expert elicitation. IEEE Access. 2017;5:19494–19504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedenborn A, Wik P, Engwall O, et al. The effect of a physical robot on vocabulary learning. 8th International Conference on Intelligent Systems; 2016 Sep 4–6. p. 376–381.
   Google Scholar
• Dickstein-Fischer L, Alexander E, Yan X, et al. An affordable compact humanoid robot for autism spectrum disorder interventions in children. 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS; 2011 Aug 30–Sep 3. p. 5319–5322.
   Google Scholar
• Dickstein-Fischer L, Fischer GS. Combining psychological and engineering approaches to utilizing social robots with children with autism. 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC); 2014 Aug 26–30. p. 792–795.
   Google Scholar
• Boccanfuso L, O’Kane JM. CHARLIE: an adaptive robot design with hand and face tracking for use in autism therapy. Int J Soc Robot. 2011;3(4):337–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozima H, Zlatev J. An epigenetic approach to human–robot communication. Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication; 2000 Sep 27–29. p. 346–351.
   Google Scholar
• Kim ES, Berkovits LD, Bernier EP, et al. Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013;43(5):1038–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabibihan JJ, Javed H, Ang M, et al. Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. Int J Soc Robot. 2013;5(4):593–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabibihan J-J, Javed H, Aldosari M, et al. Sensing technologies for autism spectrum disorder screening and intervention. Sensors. 2016;17(12):46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar