Challenges in the provision of digital technologies to elderly with dementia to support ageing in place: a case study of a Swedish municipality

References

• The European Commission. 2018. Ageing Report: Underlying Assumptions and Projection Methodologies [Internet]. European Commission; [cited 2018]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/economy-finance/2018-ageing-report-underlying-assumptions-and-projection-methodologies_en.
   Google Scholar
• Rimmer E, Stave C, Sganga A, et al. Implications for the Facing Dementia Survey for policy makers and third-party organizations across Europe. Int J Clin Prac Suppl. 2005;146:34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Ferri C, Prince M, Brayne C, et al. Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study. Lancet. 2005;366:2121–2117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince M, Bryce R, Ferri C. The benefits of early diagnosis and intervention. World Alzheimer Report 2011. Alzheimer’s Dis Int. 2011;2011:1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgeois M. Communication treatment for adults with dementia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1991;34(4):831–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehouse P, Orgogozo J, Becker R, et al. Quality of life assessment in dementia drug development. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disorder. 1997;11(3):56–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehouse P. Quality of life in Alzheimer’s disease: future directions. J Mental Health Aging. 1999;5(1):107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Batsch NL, Mittelman MS. Overcoming the stigma of dementia (Rep.). Alzheimer’s Dis Int. 2012. Available from: https://www.alz.co.uk/research/WorldAlzheimerReport2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meiland F, Innes A, Mountain G, et al. Technologies to support community-dwelling persons with dementia: a position paper on issues regarding development, usability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, deployment, and ethics. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;4(1):e1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lorenz K, Freddolino PP, Comas-Herrera A, et al. Technology-based tools and services for people with dementia and carers: Mapping technology onto the dementia care pathway. Dementia. 2019;18(2):725–741.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Span M, Hettinga M, Vernooij-Dassen M, et al. Involving people with dementia in the development of supportive IT applications: a systematic review. Age Res Rev. 2013;12(2):535–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson E, Magnusson L, Arvidsson H, et al. Working together with persons with early stage dementia and their family members to design a user-friendly technology-based support service. Dementia. 2007;6(3):411–434.
   Google Scholar
• Niemeijer AR, Frederiks BM, Riphagen I, et al. Ethical and practical concerns of surveillance technologies in residential care for people with dementia or intellectual disabilities: an overview of the literature. Int Psychogeriatr . 2010;22(7):1129–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkowska W, Ziefle M. Privacy and data security in E-health: requirements from the user’s perspectives. Health Informatics J . 2012;18(3):191–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann B. Ethical Challenges with welfare technology: a review of the literature. Sci Eng Ethics. 2013;19(2):389–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer SH, David D, Crotty B, et al. Acceptance and use of health information technology by community-dwelling elders. Int J Med Info. 2014;83(9):624–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novitzky P, Smeaton AF, Chen C, et al. A review of contemporary work on the ethics of ambient assisted living technologies. Sci Eng Ethics . 2015;21(3):707–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong H, Cassim J, Coleman R. Addressing the challenges of inclusive design; a case study approach. In: Stephanidis C, editor. Universal access in ambient intelligence environments. 2006. Berlin. Germany: Springer-Verlag; p. 273–286.
   Google Scholar
• Hellström I, Nolan M, Nordenfelt L, et al. Ethical and methodological issues in interviewing persons with dementia. Nurs Ethics. 2007;14(5):608–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubit K. Informed consent for research involving people with dementia: a grey area. Contemporary Nurse. 2010;34(2):230–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers ES, Chamberlin J, Ellison ML, et al. A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services. Psychiatr Serv. 1997;48(8):1042–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlin J. On our own: patient controlled alternatives to the mental health system. New York: McGraw Hill; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Chamberlin J. The ex-patient’s movement: where we’ve been and where we’re going. J Mind Behav. 1990;11(3-4):323–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosciulek JF. The Consumer-Directed Theory of Empowerment. Rehabil Counsel Bull. 1999;42(3):196–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner DP, Nadash A, Friedman S, et al. Principles of consumer-directed home and community-based services. Washington DC: National Institute on Consumer-Directed Long-Term Services; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson G, Newton L, Pritchard G, et al. The provision of assistive technology products and services for people with dementia in the United Kingdom. Dementia. 2016;15(4):681–701.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsertsidis A, Kolkowska E, Hedström K. Factors influencing seniors' acceptance of technology for ageing in place in the post-implementation stage: a literature review. Int J Med Info. 2019; 129:324–333.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett B, McDonald F, Beattie E, et al. Assistive technologies for people with dementia: ethical considerations. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95(11):749–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smebye KL, Kirkevold M, Engedal K. How do persons with dementia participate in decision making related to health and daily care? A multi-case study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12(1):241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bengtson VL, Settersten RA, Kennedy BK, et al. Handbook of theories of aging. New York: Springer Publishing Company, LLC; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Frennert S. Lost in digitalization? Municipality employment of welfare technologies. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;14:635–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorslund M. Åldrandet och äldreomsorgens utveckling. Socialmedicinsk Tidskrift. 2011;87(5-6):397–406.
   Google Scholar
• Sävenstedt S, Sandman PO, Zingmark K. The duality in using information and communication technology in elder care. J Adv Nurs. 2006;56(1):17–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond J, Stave C, Sganga A, et al. Inequalities in dementia care across Europe: key findings of the Facing Dementia Survey. Int J Clin Prac Suppl. 2005;146:8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gjestsen MT, Wiig S, Testad I. What are the key contextual factors when preparing for successful implementation of assistive living technology in primary elderly care? A case study from Norway. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e015455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfs CA, Vugt ME, Verkaaik M, et al. Empowered or overpowered? Service use, needs, wants and demands in elderly patients with cognitive impairments. Int J Geriat Psychiatry . 2010;25(10):1006–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis F, Clemson LM, Mackenzie L. Technology for dementia: Attitudes and practices of occupational therapists in providing assistive technology for way finding. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;12(4):373–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearer NBC, Fleury J, Ward KA, et al. Empowerment Interventions for Older Adults. West J Nurs Res. 2012;34(1):24–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frennert S, Östlund B. Narrative Review: Technologies in Eldercare. NJSTS. 2018;6(1):21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Søndergård D, Hadnagy J, Danielsson Öberg A. Välfärdsteknik handlar inte om teknik utan om människor”:–tekniksprång i nordisk demensvård [Welfare Technology is not about Technology but people]. Stockholm (Sweden): Nordic Centre for Welfare and Social; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Dewing J. From ritual to relationship: a person-centered approach to consent in qualitative research with older people who have a dementia. Dementia. 2002;1(2):157–171.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard G, Downs M, Tester S. Including older people with dementia in research: challenges and strategies. Aging Mental Health. 2003;7(5):351–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orpwood R, Sixsmith A, Torrington J, et al. Designing technology to support quality of life of people with dementia. TAD. 2007;19(2-3):103–112.
   Google Scholar
• Whitlatch J, Menne H. Don’t forget about me. Decision making by people with dementia. J Am Soc Aging. 2009;33:66–71.
   Google Scholar
• Werner P, Heinik J. Stigma by association and Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Mental Health. 2008;12(1):92–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni D, Cicognani E, Laghi M, et al. Patients’ direction, empowerment and quality of life in haemodialysis. Psychol Health Med. 2014;19(5):552–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne G, Fisher G. The service triangle and power: the role of frontline home support workers and consumer‐directed care—an Australian context. Ind Relat J. 2019;50(2):197–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You E, Dunt D, Doyle C. How would case managers’ practice change in a consumer‐directed care environment in Australia? Health Soc Care Commun. 2017;25(1):255–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pranić L, Roehl WS. Development and validation of the customer empowerment scale in hotel service recovery. Curr Issues Tour. 2013;16(4):369–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pranic L, Roehl WS. Rethinking service recovery: a customer empowerment (CE) perspective. J Business Eco Manage. 2012;13(2):242–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosciulek JF. Consumer direction in disability policy formulation and rehabilitation service delivery. J Rehabil. 1999;65(2):4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
•  Socialstyrelsen. En nationell strategi för demenssjukdom [Internet]. SocialStyrelsen; [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2017/2017-6-4.
   Google Scholar
• White EB, Montgomery P. Electronic tracking for people with dementia: An exploratory study of the ethical issues experienced by carers in making decisions about usage. Dementia. 2014;13(2):216–232.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, et al. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging. 2006;21(2):333–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid DH, Green CW. Person-centered planning with people who have severe multiple disabilities: Validated practices and misapplications. Person-centered plan research, practice, and future directions. 2002:183–202.
   Google Scholar
• Yin RK. Case study research. Design and methods. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Oates BJ. Researching information systems and computing. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Windeborg J, Eriksson M. Förskrivning av hjälpmedel [Grundläggande förutsättningar] [Prescription of aids [Basic conditions].  Region Örebro Län; Örebro. 2015;
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Qualitative Interviewing. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Noy C. Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2008;11(4):327–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demissie C, Green RC, Mucci L, et al. Reliability of information collected by proxy in family studies of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroepidemiology. 2001;20(2):105–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan K. The perspectives of people with dementia: research methods and motivations. UK: Jessica Kingsley publishers; 2002. Chapter 8, Working with staff to include people with dementia in research; p. 117–137.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney WG, Rhoads RA. Higher Education Handbook of Theory and Research: Postmodernism and critical theory in higher education: Implications for research and practice. New York: Agathon Press; 1993.
   Google Scholar