Comfort and function remain key factors in upper limb prosthetic abandonment: findings of a scoping review

References

• Gibson JJ. The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston (MA): Houghton Mifflin; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsen BT, Prigge P, Peterson J. Upper extremity limb loss: functional restoration from prosthesis and targeted reinnervation to transplantation. J Hand Ther. 2014;27:106–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta D, Selvarajah K, Davey N. Functional outcome of patients with proximal upper limb deficiency–acquired and congenital. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:172–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kejlaa GH. Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1993;17:157–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millstein SG, Heger H, Hunter GA. Prosthetic use in adult upper limb amputees: a comparison of the body powered and electrically powered prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1986;10:27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddiss E, Chau T. Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86:977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engdahl SM, Christie BP, Kelly B, et al. Surveying the interest of individuals with upper limb loss in novel prosthetic control techniques. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head JS. The effect of socket movement and electrode contact on myoelectric prosthesis control during daily living activities [dissertation]. Manchester: University of Salford; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Peerdeman B, Boere D, Witteveen H, et al. Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48:719–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belter JT, Segil JL, Dollar AM, et al. Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: a review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2013;50:599–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Social Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richman M. Study to explore needs of upper-limb amputees [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2019 Aug 5]. Available from: https://www.research.va.gov/currents/1216-6.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Smith D. Introduction to upper-limb prosthetics: part 1. inMotion Magazine. 2007;17:40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Silcox DH, Rooks MD, Vogel RR, et al. Myoelectric prostheses. A long-term follow-up and a study of the use of alternate prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1781–1789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright TW, Hagen AD, Wood MB. Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations. J Hand Surg. 1995;20:619–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddiss E, Beaton D, Chau T. Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:346–357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007;31:236–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarland LV, Winkler SLH, Heinemann AW, et al. Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47:299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Østlie K, Lesjø IM, Franklin RJ, et al. Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7:294–303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Resnik L, Ekerholm S, Borgia M, et al. A national study of Veterans with major upper limb amputation: survey methods, participants, and summary findings. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0213578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on the Use of Selected Assistive Products and Technologies in Eliminating or Reducing the Effects of Impairments, Board on Health Care Services, Health and Medicine Division, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. The promise of assistive technology to enhance activity and work participation. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2017. Upper extremity prostheses.
   Google Scholar
• Biddiss E, Chau T. The roles of predisposing characteristics, established need, and enabling resources on upper extremity prosthesis use and abandonment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:71–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geethanjali P. Myoelectric control of prosthetic hands: state-of-the-art review. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016;9:247–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cordella F, Ciancio AL, Sacchetti R, et al. Literature review on needs of upper limb prosthesis users. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graczyk EL, Resnik L, Schiefer MA, et al. Home use of a neural-connected sensory prosthesis provides the functional and psychosocial experience of having a hand again. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuberovic I, Gill A, Resnik LJ, et al. Learning of artificial sensation through long-term home use of a sensory-enabled prosthesis. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George JA, Kluger DT, Davis TS, et al. Biomimetic sensory feedback through peripheral nerve stimulation improves dexterous use of a bionic hand. Sci Robot. 2019;4:eaax2352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Anna E, Valle G, Mazzoni A, et al. A closed-loop hand prosthesis with simultaneous intraneural tactile and position feedback. Sci Robot. 2019;4:eaau8892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngan CGY, Kapsa RMI, Choong P. Strategies for neural control of prosthetic limbs: from electrode interfacing to 3D printing. Materials. 2019;12:1927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemente F, Valle G, Controzzi M, et al. Intraneural sensory feedback restores grip force control and motor coordination while using a prosthetic hand. J Neural Eng. 2019;16:026034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminger S, Gradischar A, Skiera R, et al. Attachment of upper arm prostheses with a subcutaneous osseointegrated implant in transhumeral amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42:93–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Benz H, Borgia M, et al. Patient perspectives on benefits and risks of implantable interfaces for upper limb prostheses: a national survey. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16:515–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser CM. An evaluation of the use made of cosmetic and functional prostheses by unilateral upper limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1998;22:216–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger H, Marincek C. Upper limb prosthetic use in Slovenia. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1994;18:25–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyberd PJ, Wartenberg C, Sandsjö L, et al. Survey of upper-extremity prosthesis users in Sweden and the United Kingdom. J Prosthet Orthot. 2007;19:55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Gaine WJ, Smart C, Bransby-Zachary M. Upper limb traumatic amputees. Review of prosthetic use. J Hand Surg Br. 1997;22:73–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crandall RC, Tomhave W. Pediatric unilateral below-elbow amputees: retrospective analysis of 34 patients given multiple prosthetic options. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22:380–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maat B, Smit G, Plettenburg D, et al. Passive prosthetic hands and tools: a literature review. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42:66–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Borgia M, Silver B, et al. Systematic review of measures of impairment and activity limitation for persons with upper limb trauma and amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:1863–1892.e14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner HYN, Nätterlund BS, Hermansson L. Upper limb prosthetic outcome measures: review and content comparison based on International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010;34:109–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill W, Kyberd P, Norling Hermansson L, et al. Upper Limb Prosthetic Outcome Measures (ULPOM): a working group and their findings. J Prosthet Orthot. 2009;21:P69–P82.
   Google Scholar
• Wright FV, Hubbard S, Naumann S, et al. Evaluation of the validity of the prosthetic upper extremity functional index for children. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84:518–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hluchy P. Could 3D printing make prosthetics quicker and more comfortable for patients? [Internet]. Your Health Matters; 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 1]. Available from: http://health.sunnybrook.ca/rehab/could-3d-printing-make-prosthetics-quicker-and-more-comfortable-for-patients/
   Google Scholar
• Purdue College of Engineering. E-Glove is a sensation for prosthetic hands [Internet]. Medium. 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 1]. Available from: https://medium.com/purdue-engineering/e-glove-is-a-sensation-for-prosthetic-hands-cd1c336863d0
   Google Scholar
• Densford F. Researchers create ultrasound-sensor powered prosthetic hand with individual digit control [Internet]. The Robot Report; 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 1]. Available from: https://www.therobotreport.com/researchers-create-ultrasound-sensor-powered-prosthetic-hand-individual-digit-control/
   Google Scholar
• Hashim NA, Abd Razak NA, Abu Osman NA, et al. Improvement on upper limb body-powered prostheses (1921–2016): a systematic review. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2018;232:3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquina PF, Perry BN, Miller ME, et al. Recent advances in bioelectric prostheses. Neurol Clin Pract. 2015;5:164–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Page DM, George JA, Kluger DT, et al. Motor control and sensory feedback enhance prosthesis embodiment and reduce phantom pain after long-term hand amputation. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche AD, Rehbaum H, Farina D, et al. Prosthetic myoelectric control strategies: a clinical perspective. Curr Surg Rep. 2014;2:44.
   Google Scholar