Mobile arm supports in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a pilot study of user experience and outcomes

References

• Bushby K, Bourke J, Bullock R, et al. The multidisciplinary management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Curr Pediatr. 2005;15:292–300.
   Google Scholar
• Koeks Z, Bladen C, Salgado D, et al. Clinical outcomes in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a study of 5345 patients from the TREAT-NMD DMD global database. JND. 2017;4:293–306.
   Google Scholar
• Pane M, Coratti G, Brogna C, et al. Upper limb function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: 24 month longitudinal data. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0199223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen M, Hendriks J, Geurts A, et al. Variables associated with upper extremity function in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Neurol. 2016;263:1810–1818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lue Y-J, Chen S-S, Lu Y-M. Quality of life of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: from adolescence to young men. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:1408–1413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen M, Burgers J, Jannink M, et al. Upper limb training with dynamic arm support in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a feasibility study. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;3:256–263.
   Google Scholar
• Birnkrant D, Bushby K, Bann CM, et al. Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 3: primary care, emergency management, psychosocial care, and transitions of care across the lifespan. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17:445–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder S, Leadley R, Armstrong N, et al. The burden, epidemiology, costs and treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an evidence review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12:79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO Centre for Health Development. A glossary of terms for community health care services for older persons. Japan: WHO Centre for Health Development; 2004. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/68896
   Google Scholar
• Waldron D, Layton N. Hard and soft assistive technologies: Defining roles for clinicians. Aust Occ Ther J. 2008;55:61–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooren P, Dunning A, Janssen M, et al. Design and pilot validation of A-gear: a novel wearable dynamic arm support. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2015;12:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins M, Baumgarten J, Yasuda Y, et al. Mobile arm supports: evidence-based benefits and criteria for use. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31:388–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Phillips M. Use of powered mobile arm supports by people with neuromuscular conditions. JRRD. 2013;50:61–70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van der Heide L, van Ninhuijs B, Bergsma A, et al. An overview and categorization of dynamic arm supports for people with decreased arm function. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014;38:287–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herder JL, editor. Development of a statically balanced arm support: ARMON. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; 2005 Jun 28–Jul 1; Chicago, IL. IEEE; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Yasuda YL, Bowman K, Hsu JD. Mobile arm supports: criteria for successful use in muscle disease patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67:253–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haworth R, Dunscombe S, Nichols PJ. Mobile arm supports: an evaluation. Rheumatol Rehabil. 1978;17:240–244.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rahman T, Sample W, Seliktar R, et al. Design and testing of a functional arm orthosis in patients with neuromuscular diseases. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007;15:244–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estilow T, Glanzman AM, Powers K, et al. Use of the wilmington robotic exoskeleton to improve upper extremity function in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Am J Occup Ther. 2018;72:7202345010p1–7202345010p5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heutinck L, Jansen M, van den Elzen Y, et al. Virtual reality computer gaming with dynamic arm support in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. JND. 2018;5:359–372.
   Google Scholar
• Koo B, Montes J, Gamarnik V, et al. Design and evaluation of a hybrid passive and active gravity neutral orthosis (GNO). Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:1573–1576.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mayhew A, Mazzone ES, Eagle M, et al.; Performance of the Upper Limb (PUL) working group. Development of the performance of the upper limb module for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:1038–1045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heide LA, Gelderblom GJ, de Witte LP. Effects and effectiveness of dynamic arm supports: a technical review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;94:44–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chyatte SB, Vignos JP. The balanced forearm orthosis in muscular dystrophy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1965;46:633–636.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gunn M, Shank TM, Eppes M, et al. User evaluation of a dynamic arm orthosis for people with neuromuscular disorders. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2016;24:1277–1283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer G, Romer GRBE, Stuyt HJA, editors. Design of a Dynamic Arm Support (DAS) for gravity compensation. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics; 2007 Jun 13–15; Netherlands. IEEE; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman T, Ramanathan R, Stroud S, et al. Towards the control of a powered orthosis for people with muscular dystrophy. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2001;215:267–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman T, Sample W, Seliktar R, et al. A body-powered functional upper limb orthosis. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37:675–680.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shank T, Eppes M, Hossain J, et al. Outcome measures with COPM of children using a wilmington robotic exoskeleton. Open J Occup Ther. 2017;5:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. Canadian occupational performance measure. 2nd ed. Ottowa (ON): Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists Publications ACE; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Vandervelde L, Van den Bergh PY, Penta M, et al. Validation of the ABILHAND questionnaire to measure manual ability in children and adults with neuromuscular disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010;81:506–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heide LA, Roentgen U, van der Pijl DJ, et al. How could the service delivery process of dynamic arm supports be optimized? TAD. 2017;29:101–108.
   Google Scholar
• National Disability Insurance Agency. National Disability Insurance Scheme: operational guidelines. Canberra (Australia): National Disability Insurance Agency; 2019. Available from: https://www.ndis.gov.au/about-us/operational-guidelines
   Google Scholar
• National Disability Insurance Agency. What are resonable and necessary supports? Canberra (Australia): National Disability Insurance Agency; 2018. Available from: https://www.ndis.gov.au/participants/reasonable-and-necessary-supports
   Google Scholar
• Armon Products. Armon Edero – Arm Support. Dongen (The Netherlands): Armon Products; 2019. Available from: http://www.armonproducts.com/products/edero/
   Google Scholar
• Jaeco Orthopedic. JAECO/Rancho MultiLink Arm w/Elevation Assist. Hot Springs (AR): Jaeco Orthopedic; 2019. Available from: http://jaecoorthopedic.com/products/products/JAECO%7B47%7DRancho-MultiLink-Arm-w%7B47%7D-Elevation-Assist.html
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Choosing a mixed methods design. In: Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL, editors. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE Publications; 2011. p. 53–106.
   Google Scholar
• Snow WM, Anderson JE, Jakobson LS. Neuropsychological and neurobehavioral functioning in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:743–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pane M, Mazzone ES, Fanelli L, et al. Reliability of the Performance of Upper Limb assessment in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014;24:201–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingels K, The Upper Limb Clinical Outcome Group, Mayhew AG, Mazzone ES, et al. Development of a patient-reported outcome measure for upper limb function in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: DMD Upper Limb PROM. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59:224–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clark V. Successful qualitative research: a practical guide for beginners. London: SAGE; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park (CA): Sage; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Miller DL. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Pract. 2000;39:124–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:214–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anney VN. Ensuring the quality of the findings of qualitative research: looking at trustworthiness criteria. JETERAPS. 2014;5:272–281.
   Google Scholar
• Government A. National Disability Insurance Scheme Act. 2013. Canberra (Australia): Australian Government; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• El-Aloul B, Speechley KN, Wei Y, et al. Fatigue in young people with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020;62:245–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Y, Speechley KN, Zou G, et al. Factors associated with health-related quality of life in children with duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Child Neurol. 2016;31:879–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: childen & youth version: Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43737/9789241547321_eng.pdf;jsessionid=BFDB7BD83072BB5351523C38C3293A07?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• van der Heide LA, Ramakers IMN, Essers J, et al. Is it possible to assess the effects of dynamic arm supports on upper extremity range of motion during activities of daily living in the domestic setting using a portable motion capturing device? – a pilot study. TAD. 2017;29:91–99.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. Parliamentary Inquiry into general issues around the implementation and performance of the NDIS. Canberra (Australia): Commonwealth of Australia; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. Parliamentary Inquiry into provision of assistive technology under the NDIS. Canberra (Australia): Commonwealth of Australia; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels R, Witte L, Andrich R, et al. IPPA, a user-centred approach to assess effectiveness of assistive technology provision. TAD. 2000;13:105–115.
   Google Scholar
• Day H, Jutai J, Campbell KA. Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:31–37. 7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 1996;8:3–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar