222
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Video modelling as a tool to evaluate self-perception of strategies used by adolescents during daily tasks

, &
Pages 177-183 | Received 18 Mar 2020, Accepted 23 May 2020, Published online: 05 Jun 2020

References

  • Ownsworth T, Fleming J, Desbois J, et al. A metacognitive contextual intervention to enhance error awareness and functional outcome following traumatic brain injury: a single-case experimental design. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;12:54–63.
  • Godefroy O. Frontal syndrome and disorders of executive functions. J Neurol. 2003;250:1–6.
  • Josman N, Kizony R, Hof E, et al. Using the virtual action planning-supermarket for evaluating executive functions in people with stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;23:879–887.
  • Toglia J, Golisz K. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the impact on daily life. In: Chiaravalloti N, Goverover Y, editors. Changes in the brain. New York (NY): Springer New York; 2017. p. 117–143.
  • Toglia JP, Rodger SA, Polatajko HJ. Anatomy of cognitive strategies: a therapist’s primer for enabling occupational performance. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79:225–236.
  • Polatajko HJ, Mandich A. Enabling occupation in children: the cognitive orientation to daily occupational performance (CO-OP) approach. Ottawa (ON): CAOT Publications ACE; 2004.
  • Walsh MM, Anderson JR. The strategic nature of changing your mind. Cogn Psychol. 2009;58:416–440.
  • Pressiey M, Borkowski JG, Schneider W. Cognitive strategies: good strategy users coordinate. Strategy. 1985;4:89–129.
  • Harris KR, Alexander P, Graham S. Michael Pressley’s contributions to the history and future of strategies research. Educ Psychol. 2008;43:86–96.
  • Conley MW, Freidhoff JR, Gritter K, et al. Strategies that improve adolescents’ performance with content-area texts. In: Conley MW, Freidhoff JR, Sherry MB, et al. Meeting the challenge of adolescent literacy: research we have, research we need. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2008. p. 88–103.
  • Toglia J. Weekly calendar planning activity (WCPA): a performance test of executive function. American occupational therapy association; 2015. p. 176.
  • Toglia J, Kirk U. Understanding awareness deficits following brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2000;15:57–70.
  • Wigfield A, Eccles JS. Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000;25:68–81.
  • Roebers CM. Executive function and metacognition: towards a unifying framework of cognitive self-regulation. Dev Rev. 2017;45:31–51.
  • Harter S. Emerging self-processes during childhood and adolescence. In: Leary MP, Tangney JP, editors. Handbook of self and identity. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2012. p. 680–715.
  • Allen JB, Howe BL. Player ability, coach feedback, and female adolescent athletes’ perceived competence and satisfaction. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 1998;20:280–299.
  • Nicholls JG. Achievement motivation: conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychol Rev. 1984;91:328–346.
  • Hewitt J. Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. J Learn Sci. 2005;14:567–589.
  • Rith-Najarian LR, McLaughlin KA, Sheridan MA, et al. The biopsychosocial model of stress in adolescence: self-awareness of performance versus stress reactivity. Stress. 2014;17:193–203.
  • Zlotnik S, Toglia J. Measuring adolescent self-awareness and accuracy using a performance-based assessment and parental report. Front Public Health. 2018;6:15.
  • Winsler A, Naglieri J. Overt and covert verbal problem-solving strategies: developmental trends in use, awareness, and relations with task performance in children aged 5 to 17. Child Dev. 2003;74:659–678.
  • Lahav O, Maeir A, Weintraub N. Gender differences in students’ self-awareness of their handwriting performance. Br J Occup Ther. 2014;77:614–618.
  • Zell E, Krizan Z. Do people have insight into their abilities? A metasynthesis. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014;9:111–125.
  • Moritz SE, Feltz DL, Fahrbach KR, et al. The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: a meta-analytic review. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2000;71:280–294.
  • Lew MDN, Alwis WAM, Schmidt HG. Accuracy of students’ self‐assessment and their beliefs about its utility. Assess Eval High Educ. 2010;35:135–156.
  • Blanch-Hartigan D. Medical students’ self-assessment of performance: results from three meta-analyses. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;84:3–9.
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In: Weiner IB, Craighead WE, editors. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2010.
  • Beaudoin M, Desrichard O. Are memory self-efficacy and memory performance related? A meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2011;137:211–241.
  • Ownsworth T, Haslam C. Impact of rehabilitation on self-concept following traumatic brain injury: an exploratory systematic review of intervention methodology and efficacy. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2016;26:1–35.
  • Schmidt J, Fleming J, Ownsworth T, et al. Video feedback on functional task performance improves self-awareness after traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013;27:316–324.
  • Fleming JM, Ownsworth T. A review of awareness interventions in brain injury rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2006;16:474–500.
  • Bandura A, Menlove FL. Factors determining vicarious extinction of avoidance behavior through symbolic modeling. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1968;8:99–108.
  • Dowrick PW. A review of self modeling and related interventions. Appl Prevent Psychol. 1999;8:23–39.
  • Mechling L. The effect of instructor-created video programs to teach students with disabilities: a literature review. J Spec Educ Technol. 2005;20:25–36.
  • Hochhauser M, Gal E, Weiss PL. Negotiation strategy video modeling training for adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: a usability study. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2015;31:472–480.
  • Dziobek I, Fleck S, Kalbe E, et al. Introducing MASC: a movie for the assessment of social cognition. J Autism Dev Disord. 2006;36:623–636.
  • You S, Dang M, Lim SA. Effects of student perceptions of teachers’ motivational behavior on reading, English, and mathematics achievement: the mediating role of domain specific self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. Child Youth Care Forum. 2016;45:221–240.
  • Weiss PL, Hochhauser M, Rosen R, et al. Simulating the practice of daily life social and vocational situations via video modeling. Proceedings of the International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation, ICVR; 2015 June 9–12; Valencia, Spain. 2015.
  • Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, et al. Behavior rating inventory of executive function. Child Neuropsychol. 2000;6:235–238.
  • Rasmussen C, Mcauley R, Andrew G, et al. Parental ratings of children with fetal alcohol spectrum. Children. 2007;5:1–8.
  • Linder N, Kroyzer N, Maeir A, et al. Do ADHD and executive dysfunctions, measured by the Hebrew version of behavioral rating inventory of executive functions (BRIEF), completely overlap? Child Neuropsychol. 2010;16:494–502.
  • Lahav O, Ben-Simon A, Inbar-Weiss N, et al. Weekly calendar planning activity for university students: comparison of individuals with and without ADHD by gender. J Atten Disord. 2015;22:368–378.
  • Toglia J, Berg C. Performance-based measure of executive function: comparison of community and at-risk youth. Am J Occup Ther. 2013;67:515–523.
  • Zlotnik S, Schiff A, Ravid S, et al. A new approach for assessing executive functions in everyday life, among adolescents with genetic generalised epilepsies. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020;30:333–345.
  • Meltzer L, Reddy R, Pollica LS, et al. Positive and negative self-perceptions: is there a cyclical relationship between teachers’ and students’ perceptions of effort, strategy use, and academic performance? Learning Disabil Res Pract. 2004;19:33–44.
  • Pajares F. Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: a review of the literature. Read Writ Q. 2003;19:139–158.
  • Britner SL, Pajares F. Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students. J Res Sci Teach. 2006;43:485–499.
  • Marsh HW, O'Mara A. Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008;34:542–552.
  • Rosen LD, Mark Carrier L, Cheever NA. Facebook and texting made me do it: Media-induced task-switching while studying. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29:948–958.
  • Rothman DA. Tsunami of learners called generation Z. 2016 [cited 2018 Oct 30]. Available from: http://www.mdle.net/journal/a_tsunami_of_learners_called_generation_z.pdf
  • Reeves E. The practice of contracting in public private partnerships: Transaction costs and relational contracting in the Irish schools sector. Public Adm. 2008;86:969–986.
  • Holton T, Fraser B. Generation Z and Technology. Dunn & Jesion Smillie. 2015 [cited 2018 May 29]. Available from: http://cradpdf.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc199/p802434_A1b.pdf
  • Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: do they really think differently? On the Horizon. 2001;9:1–6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424843
  • Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon. 2001;9:1–6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
  • Grist R, Croker A, Denne M, et al. Technology delivered interventions for depression and anxiety in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2019;22:147–171.
  • Igel C, Urquhart V. Generation Z, Meet Cooperative Learning. Middle School Journal. 2012;43:16–21.
  • Seemiller C, Grace M. Generation Z goes to college [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Sep 14];35:286. Available from: https://books.google.co.il/books?hl=iw&lr=&id=xjDvCQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=generation+z+as+students&ots=7AKrKvhE8f&sig=OB7ujH1brbNu-r0wgj62gwq9z2g&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=generationzasstudents&f=false
  • Mohr KAJ, Eric MS. Understanding generation Z students to promote a contemporary learning environment. J Empower Teach Excellence. 2017;1:84–94.
  • Toglia J, Johnston MV, Goverover Y, et al. A multicontext approach to promoting transfer of strategy use and self regulation after brain injury: an exploratory study. Brain Inj. 2010;24:664–677.
  • Hahn-Markowitz J, Manor I, Maeir A. Effectiveness of cognitive-functional (Cog-Fun) intervention with children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65:384–392.
  • Steinberg C, Zlotnik S. The multicontext approach. In: Wolf TJ, Edwards DF, Giles GM, editors. Functional cognition and occupational therapy: a practical approach to treating individuals with cognitive loss. AOTA Press; 2019.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.