522
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Physiotherapists’ clinical use and acceptance of a telemonitoring platform during anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation: a prospective clinical study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 184-191 | Received 19 Mar 2020, Accepted 23 May 2020, Published online: 10 Jun 2020

References

  • Majewski M, Susanne H, Klaus S. Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: a 10-year study. Knee. 2006;13:184–188.
  • Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, et al. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: a 21-year population-based study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:1502–1507.
  • Gornitzky AL, Lott A, Yellin JL, et al. Sport-specific yearly risk and incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears in high school athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:2716–2723.
  • Mall NA, Chalmers PN, Moric M, et al. Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:2363–2370.
  • Moses B, Orchard J, Orchard J. Systematic review: annual incidence of ACL injury and surgery in various populations. Res Sports Med. 2012;20:157–179.
  • Myklebust G, Bahr R. Return to play guidelines after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:127–131.
  • Ardern CL. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-not exactly a one-way ticket back to the preinjury level: a review of contextual factors affecting return to sport after surgery. Sports Health. 2015;7:224–230.
  • Lynch AD, Logerstedt DS, Grindem H, et al. Consensus criteria for defining ‘successful outcome’ after ACL injury and reconstruction: a Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort investigation. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49:335–342.
  • Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, et al. Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:1543–1552.
  • Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, et al. Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:596–606.
  • Coronado RA, Bird ML, Van Hoy EE, et al. Do psychosocial interventions improve rehabilitation outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32:287–298.
  • Patel NK, Sabharwal S, Hadley C, et al. Factors affecting return to sport following hamstrings anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in non-elite athletes. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29:1771–1779.
  • de Valk EJ, Moen MH, Winters M, et al. Preoperative patient and injury factors of successful rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with single-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy. 2013;29:1879–1895.
  • Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, et al. A systematic review of the psychological factors associated with returning to sport following injury. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47:1120–1126.
  • Langford JL, Webster KE, Feller JA. A prospective longitudinal study to assess psychological changes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Br J Sports Med. 2009 May;43:377–381.
  • Kvist J, Ek A, Sporrstedt K, et al. Fear of re-injury: a hindrance for returning to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13:393–397.
  • Thomee P, Wahrborg P, Borjesson M, et al. Self-efficacy of knee function as a pre-operative predictor of outcome 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:118–127.
  • Shukla H, Nair SR, Thakker D. Role of telerehabilitation in patients following total knee arthroplasty: evidence from a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23:339–346.
  • Hailey D, Roine R, Ohinmaa A, et al. Evidence of benefit from telerehabilitation in routine care: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2011;17:281–287.
  • Kroeze W, Werkman A, Brug J. A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Ann Behav Med. 2006;31:205–223.
  • Regions of Europe working together for HEALTH – final report. 2014. Available from: http://www.renewinghealth.eu/documents/28946/555381f3-9686-4955-8547-76b58be34a04
  • van Melick N, van Cingel RE, Brooijmans F, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50:1506–1515.
  • Meuffels DE, Poldervaart MT, Diercks RL, et al. Guideline on anterior cruciate ligament injury. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:379–386.
  • Wright RW, MOON Group, Haas AK, Anderson J, et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: MOON guidelines. Sports Health. 2015;7:239–243.
  • Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. The use of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33:273–278.
  • Van Peppen RP, Maissan FJ, Van Genderen FR, et al. Outcome measures in physiotherapy management of patients with stroke: a survey into self-reported use, and barriers to and facilitators for use. Physiother Res Int. 2008;13:255–270.
  • Abrams D, Davidson M, Harrick J, et al. Monitoring the change: current trends in outcome measure usage in physiotherapy. Man Ther. 2006;11:46–53.
  • Shea KG, Carey JL, Richmond J, et al.; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons evidence-based guideline on management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:672–674.
  • van Grinsven S, van Cingel RE, Holla CJ, et al. Evidence-based rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010;18:1128–1144.
  • Finch TL, Mair FS, O'Donnell C, et al. From theory to ‘measurement’ in complex interventions: methodological lessons from the development of an e-health normalisation instrument . BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:69.
  • Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13:319–340.
  • Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci. 1989;35:982–1003.
  • Ghanbari H, Similä J, Markkula J. Utilizing online serious games to facilitate distributed requirements elicitation. J Syst Softw. 2015;109:32–49.
  • Li J, Talaei-Khoei A, Seale H, et al. Health care provider adoption of ehealth: systematic literature review. Interact J Med Res. 2013;2:(1):e7.
  • Kissi J, Dai B, Dogbe CS, et al. Predictive factors of physicians’ satisfaction with telemedicine services acceptance. Health Informatics J. 2019. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219892162
  • Dunphy E, Hamilton FL, Spasic I, et al. Acceptability of a digital health intervention alongside physiotherapy to support patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18:471.
  • Rho MJ, Choi IY, Lee J. Predictive factors of telemedicine service acceptance and behavioral intention of physicians. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83:559–571.
  • Baumel A, Yom-Tov E. Predicting user adherence to behavioral eHealth interventions in the real world: examining which aspects of intervention design matter most. Transl Behav Med. 2018;8:793–798.
  • Wouters M, Huygens M, Voogdt H, et al. Samen aan zet! eHealth-monitor 2019. Den Haag: Nictiz, Nivel; 2019.
  • Hamine S, Gerth-Guyette E, Faulx D, et al. Impact of mHealth chronic disease management on treatment adherence and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e52.
  • Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7:e11.
  • Gray KD, Maeder A, Butler-Henderson K, et al. Advancing Ehealth education for the clinical health professions. 2014. Available from: http://clinicalinformaticseducation.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/74500403/PP10_1806_Gray_report_2014.pdf
  • Brunner M, McGregor D, Keep M, et al. An eHealth capabilities framework for graduates and health professionals: mixed-methods study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:e10229.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.