Designing ApplTree: usable scheduling software for people with cognitive impairments

References

• World Health Organisation. Neurological Disorders public health challenges. 2020. Available from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/neurology/neurological_disorders_report_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evans JJ, Emslie H, Wilson BA, et al. External cueing systems in the rehabilitation of executive impairments of action. J Int Neuropsychol Soc.1998;4(4):399–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shum D, Fleming J, Neulinger K. Prospective memory and traumatic brain injury: a review. Brain Impair. 2002;3(1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Winegardner J, Van Heugten CM, et al., editors. Neuropsychological rehabilitation: the international handbook. UK: Psychology Press; 2017. p. 604.
   Google Scholar
• Boman I-L, Bartfai A, Borell L, et al. Support in everyday activities with a home-based electronic memory aid for persons with memory impairments. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(5):339–350.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Joode E, van Heugten C, Verhey F, et al. Efficacy and usability of assistive technology for patients with cognitive deficits: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24(8):701–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie A, Best C, O’Neill B, et al. Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012;18(1):1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson M, Cullen B, McGee-Lennon M, et al. The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people with memory impairments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3–4):419–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oddy M, Da Silva Ramos S. The clinical and cost-benefits of investing in neurobehavioural rehabilitation: a multi-centre study. Brain Inj. 2013;27(13–14):1500–1507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson M, Cullen B, McGee-Lennon M, et al. Technological memory aid use by people with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017;27(6):919–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson M, McGee-Lennon M, Cullen B, et al. Issues influencing the uptake of smartphone reminder apps for people with acquired brain injury. Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility - ASSETS ’15; 2015 Dec; Lisbon, Portugal. p. 339–340.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson M, O’Neill B, Cullen B, et al. ForgetMeNot : active reminder entry support for adults with acquired brain injury. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2017 May; Denver, USA. p. 6012–6023.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Emslie HC, Quirk K, et al. Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: a randomised control crossover study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70(4):477–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill B, Gillespie A. Assistive technology for cognition: a handbook for clinicians and developers. Hove: Psychology Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Davies DK, Stock SE, Wehmeyer ML, et al. Enhancing independent time-management skills of individuals with mental retardation using a palmtop personal computer. Mental Retard. 2002;40(5):358–365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fage C, Pommereau L, Consel C, et al. Tablet-based activity schedule in mainstream environment for children with autism and children with ID. ACM Trans Access Comput. 2016;8(3):1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva Ramos S, Jamieson M. Cognitive impairment and EAT. In: Handbook of electronic assistive technology. UK: Academic Press; 2019. p. 27–52.
   Google Scholar
• Svoboda E, Richards B, Leach L, et al. PDA and smartphone use by individuals with moderate-to- severe memory impairment : application of a theory-driven training programme. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2012;22(3):408–427.
   Google Scholar
• Widehammar C, Lidström H, Hermansson L, et al. Environmental barriers to participation and facilitators for use of three types of assistive technology devices. Assist Technol. 2019;31(2):68–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe A, Fickas S, Sohlberg M, et al. Investigating the usability of assistive user interfaces. Interact Comput. 2003;15(4):577–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis C. HCI for people with cognitive disabilities. SIGACCESS Access Comput. 2005;83(83):12–17.
   Google Scholar
• de Joode EA, van Boxtel MPJ, Verhey FR, et al. Use of assistive technology in cognitive rehabilitation: exploratory studies of the opinions and expectations of healthcare professionals and potential users. Brain Inj. 2012;26(10):1257–1266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berget G, MacFarlane A. What is known about the impact of impairments on information seeking and searching? J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2020;71(5):596–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abou-Zahra S. Diverse Abilities and Barriers. World Wide Web Consortium [Online]. 2017. Available from: http://www.w3.org/WAI/peopleuse-web/abilities-barriers
   Google Scholar
• Web Accessibility Initiative. How to meet WCAG 2.0. 2016. Available from: http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/quickref/2007
   Google Scholar
• Borg J, Lantz A, Gulliksen J, et al. Accessibility to electronic communication for people with cognitive disabilities: a systematic search and review of empirical evidence. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2015;14(4):547–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson M, Monastra M, Gillies G, et al. The use of a smartwatch as a prompting device for people with acquired brain injury: a single case experimental design study. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2019;29(4):513–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul L, Wyke S, Brewster S, et al. Increasing physical activity in stroke survivors using STARFISH, an interactive mobile phone application : a pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23(3):170–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford JR, Smith G, Maylor EA, et al. The Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire (PRMQ): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Memory. 2003;11(3):261–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish J, Evans JJ, Nimmo M, et al. Rehabilitation of executive dysfunction following brain injury: “content-free” cueing improves everyday prospective memory performance. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45(6):1318–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Cockburn J, Baddley A. The rivermead behavioural memory test. 2nd ed. Bury St Edmonds: Thames Valley Test Company; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Delis DC, Kaplan E, Kramer JH. Delis-Kaplan executive function system (D–KEFS). USA: American Psychological Association; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 2nd ed. UK: Sage; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson BA, Scott H, Evans J, et al. Preliminary report of a NeuroPage service within a health care system. NeuroRehabilitation. 2003;18(1):3–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neill BO. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation : An International Scaffolding rehabilitation behaviour using a voice- mediated assistive technology for cognition. 2010; October 2012 (2010); 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Svoboda E, Richards B, Yao C, et al. Long-term maintenance of smartphone and PDA use in individuals with moderate to severe memory impairment. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2015;25(3):353–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’neill B, Best C, O'Neill L, et al. Efficacy of a micro-prompting technology in reducing support needed by people with severe acquired brain injury in activities of daily living: a randomized control trial. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018;33(5):33–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Joode E, Proot I, Slegers K, et al. The use of standard calendar software by individuals with acquired brain injury and cognitive complaints: a mixed methods study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(5):389–398.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar