Perspectives on usability and accessibility of an autonomous humanoid robot living with elderly people

References

• Pu L, Moyle W, Jones C, et al. The effectiveness of social robots for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gerontologist. 2019;59(1):e37–e51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanpain N, Buisson G. Projections de population 2013-2070 pour la France. Résultats; 2016; 187 INSEE, 3 November.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. World Population Ageing. 2019. Highlights. ST/ESA/SER.A/430, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.
   Google Scholar
• Neven L. 'But obviously not for me': robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. Sociol Health Illn. 2010;32(2):335–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos I, Koulouglioti C. The influence of culture on attitudes towards humanoid and animal-like robots: an integrative review. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018;50(6):653–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y-H, Cristancho-Lacroix V, Fassert C, et al. The attitudes and perceptions of older adults with mild cognitive impairment toward an assistive robot. J Appl Gerontol. 2016;35(1):3–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitzner TL, Chen TL, Kemp CC, et al. Identifying the potential for robotics to assist older adults in different living environments. Int J Soc Robot. 2014;6(2):213–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maalouf N, Sidaoui A, Elhajj IH, et al. Robotics in nursing: a scoping review. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018;50(6):590–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdi J, Al-Hindawi A, Ng T, et al. Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e018815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Góngora Alonso S, Hamrioui S, de la Torre Díez I, et al. Social robots for people with aging and dementia: a systematic review of literature. Telemed J E Health. 2019;25(7):533–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorini L, De Mul M, Fabbricotti I, et al. Assistive robots to improve the independent living of older persons: results from a needs study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;22:1–11.DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1642392
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos I, Koulouglioti C, Lazzarino R, et al. Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2020;10(1):e033096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos C, Hill T, Battistuzzi L, et al. The CARESSES study protocol: testing and evaluating culturally competent socially assistive robots among older adults residing in long term care homes through a controlled experimental trial. Arch Public Health. 2020; 78:26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanioka T. Nursing and rehabilitative care of the elderly using humanoid robots. J Med Invest. 2019;66(1.2):19–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frennert S, Eftring H, Östlund B, et al. Older people’s involvement in the development of a social assistive robot. In: Herrmann G, Pearson MJ, Lenz A, editors. Social robotics. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2013. p. 8–18.
   Google Scholar
• Frennert S, Eftring H, Östlund B, et al. What older people expect of robots: a mixed methods approach. In: Herrmann G, Pearson MJ, Lenz A, editors. Social robotics. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2013. p. 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Ocnarescu I, Cossin I. Rethinking the why of socially assistive robotics through design. In: Social Robotics, 9th International Conference, ICSR 2017, Tsukuba, Japan, November 22–24, 2017, Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash A, Rogers WA. Why some humanoid faces are perceived more positively than others: effects of human-likeness and task. Int J Soc Robot. 2015;7(2):309–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backonja U, Hall AK, Painter I, et al. Comfort and attitudes towards robots among young, middle-aged, and older adults: a cross-sectional study. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018;50(6):623–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineau J, Montemerlo M, Pollack M, et al. Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: challenges and results. Rob Auton Syst. 2003;42(3-4):271–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faucounau V, Wu Y-H, Boulay M, et al. Caregivers’ requirements for in-home robotic agent for supporting community-living elderly subjects with cognitive impairment. Technol Health Care. 2009;17(1):33–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korchut A, Szklener S, Abdelnour C, et al. Challenges for service robots-requirements of elderly adults with cognitive impairments. Front Neurol. 2017;8:228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer JM, Prakash A, Mitzner TL, et al. Understanding robot acceptance. Technical report HFA-TR-1103. Technical report, Atlanta, GA: Georgia Institute of Technology; 2011. [cited 2018 Sep 17]. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/39672.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo CF, Gemperle F, Forlizzi J, et al. All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2002. p. 321–326.
   Google Scholar
• Frennert S, Eftring H, Östlund B. Case report: Implications of doing research on socially assistive robots in real homes. Int J of Soc Robotics. 2017;9(3):401–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dautenhahn K. Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 2007;362(1480):679–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharkey A, Sharkey N. Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol. 2012;14(1):27–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangmo T, Lipps M, Kressig RW, et al. Ethical concerns with the use of intelligent assistive technology: findings from a qualitative study with professional stakeholders. BMC Med Ethics. 2019;20(1):98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar