User behaviour-based approach to define mobility devices needs of disabled person in Algeria: a questionnaire study

References

• Reid-Cunningham AR. Anthropological theories of disability. J Human Behav Social Environ. 2009;19(1):99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Ablon J. The elephant man’ as ‘self’ and ‘other’: the psycho-social costs of a misdiagnosis. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40(11):1481–1489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mountain G, Wilson S, Eccleston C, et al. Developing and testing a telerehabilitation system for people following stroke: issues of usability. J Eng Des. 2010;21(2-3):223–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott R, Varenne H. Culture as disability. Anthropol Educ Quarterly. 1995;26(3):324–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett U. Disabled by design. Disabil Soc. 2002;17(7):809–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization, et al. World report on disability: World Health Organization; 2011. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en/
   Google Scholar
• Organization WH. Disability and health; 2018. Available from: http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/disability-and-health
   Google Scholar
• Soro WL, Wayoro D. A mixed effects negative binomial analysis of road mortality determinants in sub-Saharan African countries. Transport Res F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2018;52:120–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohwerder B. Disability in North Africa. K4D Helpdesk Report. Brighton (UK): Institute of Development Studies; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• ONS. National office of statistics; 2013. [cited 2019 Feb 3]. Available from: http://www.ons.dz.
   Google Scholar
• National consultative commission of promotion and protection of human rights Algeria; 2013. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Disability/SocialProtection/NHRI/NHRIAlgeriaFRA.docx
   Google Scholar
• Simpson RC. Smart wheelchairs: a literature review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(4):423–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IOS. 2007. Wheelchairs – part 26: Vocabulary; 2007. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/44224.html
   Google Scholar
• Pearlman J, Cooper R, Chhabra H, et al. Design, development and testing of a low-cost electric powered wheelchair for India. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2009;4(1):42–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jenab K, Sarfaraz A, Ameli MT. A conceptual design selection model considering conflict resolution. J Eng Des. 2013;24(4):293–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groce Kaplan N. Mainstreaming disability in mdg policies, processes and mechanisms. UN Secretary General’s Office. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Malone K, Silla A, Johanssen C, et al. Safety, mobility and comfort assessment methodologies of intelligent transport systems for vulnerable road users. Eur Transp Res Rev. 2017;9(2):21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper RA. Engineering manual and electric powered wheelchairs. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1999;27(1-2):27–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares MM. Translating user needs into product design for the disabled: an ergonomic approach. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2012;13(1):92–120.
   Google Scholar
• Kittidecha C, Yamada K. Application of Kansei engineering and data mining in the Thai ceramic manufacturing. J Ind Eng Int. 2018;14(4):757–766.
   Google Scholar
• Deng Z, Chu D, Wu C, et al. Curve safe speed model considering driving style based on driver behaviour questionnaire. Transport Res F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2019;65:536–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Disability. United Nations Disability Dept of Eonomics and Social Affairs; 2010. Available from: http://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/resources/world_programme-of-action-concerning-disabled\persons.html
   Google Scholar
• League of Arab States. Disability in the Arab region: an overview. League of Arab web site. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sahnoun M, Fattouh A, Bourhis G, et al. Assisted control for a powered wheelchair with a force feedback joystick. In: Assistive technology: from virtuality to reality. 2005. p. 601–605.
   Google Scholar
• Sahnoun M, Bourhris G. Conception et simulation d’une commande à retour d’effort pour fauteuil roulant électrique. STH. 2007;1(2):123–141.
   Google Scholar
• Chaaraoui AA, Climent-Pérez P, Flórez-Revuelta F. A review on vision techniques applied to human behaviour analysis for ambient-assisted living. Expert Syst Appl. 2012;39(12):10873–10888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavoulas G, Chatzaki C, Malliotakis T. The mobiact dataset: recognition of activities of daily living using smartphones. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health (ICT4AgeingWell); 2016. p. 143–151.
   Google Scholar
• Wu J, Osuntogun A, Choudhury T, et al. A scalable approach to activity recognition based on object use. In: Computer Vision, 2007. ICCV 2007. IEEE 11th International Conference on; IEEE; 2007. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Harzallah M, Vernadat F. It-based competency modeling and management: from theory to practice in enterprise engineering and operations. Comput Ind. 2002;48(2):157–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebers P, Baines T, Mason S, et al. Modelling human variation in assembly line models. In: proceedings of the 2004 Operational Research Society Simulation Workshop (SW04), UK; Citeseer; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy WG. Modelling human behaviour in agent-based models. In: Agent-based models of geographical systems. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Springer; 2012. p. 167–179.
   Google Scholar
• Jones C. Behavioral theory in simulation: Ambiguous results from simple relationships. In: Proceedings the 23rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, USA; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Miranda J, Aldea A, Bañares-Alcántara R, et al. Teaks: Simulation of human performance at work to support team configuration. In: Proceedings of the fifth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems; ACM; 2006. p. 114–116.
   Google Scholar
• Brailsford SC, Harper PR, Sykes J. Incorporating human behaviour in simulation models of screening for breast cancer. Eur J Oper Res. 2012;219(3):491–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdi F, Abolmakarem S. Customer behavior mining framework (cbmf) using clustering and classification techniques. J Ind Eng Int. 2019;15(S1):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kieffer L, Audard F. Modéliser les chaînes de déplacements: reconstruire la mobilité quotidienne à travers le prisme des déplacements secondaires. In: CIST2014-Fronts et frontières des sciences du territoire; 2014. p. 251–255.
   Google Scholar
• Bifulco GN, Cartenì A, Papola A. An activity-based approach for complex travel behaviour modelling. Eur Transp Res Rev. 2010;2(4):209–221.
   Google Scholar
• Šimeček M, Gabrhel V, Tögel M, et al. Travel behaviour of seniors in eastern europe: a comparative study of brno and bratislava. Eur Transp Res Rev. 2018;10(1):16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Boyle IM. Engineering design: perspectives, challenges, and recent advances. J Eng Des. 2009;20(1):7–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran WG. Sampling techniques. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
   Google Scholar