Athletes with disability’ satisfaction with sport wheelchairs: an Italian cross sectional study

References

• EU Workgroup “Sport & Health”. EU physical activity guidelines – recommended policy actions in support of health-enhancing physical activity. Brussels: European Commission; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Ploeg HP, Van Der Beek AJ, Van Der Woude LHV, et al. Physical activity for people with a disability: a conceptual model. Sports Med. 2004;34:639–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma JK, West CR, Martin Ginis KA. The effects of a patient and provider co-developed, behavioral physical activity intervention on physical activity, psychosocial predictors, and fitness in individuals with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. Sport Med. 2019;49:1117–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton-Shaeffer C, Gibson H, Holt M, et al. Women’s resistance and empowerment through wheelchair sport. World Leis J. 2001;43:11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Blauwet C, Willick SE. The paralympic movement: using sports to promote health, disability rights, and social integration for athletes with disabilities. PM R. 2012;4:851–856.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bloemen MAT, Backx FJG, Takken T, et al. Factors associated with physical activity in children and adolescents with a physical disability: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57:137–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matheri J, Frantz JM. Physical activity levels among young people with physical disabilities in selected high schools in Kenya and their perceived barriers and facilitators to participation. J Commmunity Health Sci. 2009;4:21–26.
   Google Scholar
• Seron BB, De AGA, Greguol M. Facilitadores e barreiras percebidas para a prática de atividade física por pessoas com deficiência motora. Rev Bras Ciencias Do Esporte. 2015;37:214–221.
   Google Scholar
• Shields N, Synnot AJ, Barr M. Perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity for children with disability: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46:989–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkett B. Technology in paralympic sport: performance enhancement or essential for performance? Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:215–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill D, Scarborough DM, Berkson E, et al. Athletic assistive technology for persons with physical conditions affecting mobility. J Prosthetics Orthot. 2014;26:154–165.
   Google Scholar
• Eggers SL, Myaskovsky L, Burkitt KH, et al. A preliminary model of wheelchair service delivery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1030–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dacey ML, Newcomer AR. A client-centered counseling approach for motivating older adults toward physical activity. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation. 2005;21:194–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofani M, Candeloro C, Sabbadini M, et al. The psychosocial impact of assistive device scale: Italian validation in a cohort of nonambulant people with neuromotor disorders. Assist Technol. 2020;32:54–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofani M, Berardi A, Sansoni J, et al. Validity and responsiveness of the psychosocial impact of assistive device scale in hip arthroplasty patients. Minerva Ortop e Traumatol. 2019;70:193–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardi A, De Santis R, Tofani M, et al. The Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale: Italian translation, adaptation, and validation of the short form. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13:575–580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeoto G, Colucci M, Guarino D, et al. Exploring validity, reliability, and factor analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology in an Italian population: a cross-sectional study. Occup Ther Heal Care. 2018;32:380–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colucci M, Tofani M, Trioschi D, et al. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST-IT 2.0) with users of mobility assistive device. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B, et al. Item analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 2000;12:96–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Wessels R, Weiss-Lambrou R, et al. Key dimensions of client satisfaction with assistive technology: a cross-validation of a Canadian measure in the Netherlands. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33:187–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koumpouros Y, Karavasili A, Papageorgiou E, et al. Validation of the Greek version of the device subscale of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology 2.0 (QUEST 2.0). Assist Technol. 2016;28:152–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho KEC, de G, Júnior MB, Sá KN. Tradução e validação do Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) para o idioma português do Brasil. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2014;54:260–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao HF, Chen WY, Yao G, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): The development of the Taiwanese version. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:412–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels RD, De Witte LP. Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of QUEST 2.0 with users of various types of assistive devices. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25:267–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang WJ, Hwang S, Chung Y. Test-retest reliability of the Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction with assistive technology 2.0-Korean version for individuals with spinal cord injury. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27:1291–1293.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee S, Park S, Jung B. Korean translation and psychometric properties of Quebec user evaluation of satisfaction assistive technology 2.0. J Kor Acad Ind Coop. 2013;14:3284–3292.
   Google Scholar
• Dattoli S, Colucci M, Soave MG, et al. Evaluation of pelvis postural systems in spinal cord injury patients: outcome research. J Spinal Cord Med. 2020;43:185–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeoto G, Scialpi A, Grassi ML, et al. General Sleep Disturbance Scale: translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric properties of the Italian version. Cranio. 2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeoto G, Sansoni J, Valenti D, et al. The effect of physiotherapy on fatigue and physical functioning in chronic fatigue syndrome patients: a systematic review. Clin Ter. 2018;169:e184–e188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anna B, Giovanni G, Marco T, et al. The validity of rasterstereography as a technological tool for the objectification of postural assessment in the clinical and educational fields: pilot study. In: Popescu E, Belén Gil A, Lancia L, et al., editors. Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 9th International Conference, Workshops. MIS4TEL 2019. Cham: Springer; 2020. (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; vol. 1008).
   Google Scholar
• Puledda F, Viganò A, Celletti C, et al. A study of migraine characteristics in joint hypermobility syndrome a.k.a. Ehlers–Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type. Neurol Sci. 2015;36:1417–1424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardi A, Biondillo A, Màrquez MA, et al. Validation of the short version of the Van Lieshout Test in an Italian population with cervical spinal cord injuries: a cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord. 2019;57:339–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardi A, Dhrami L, Tofani M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation in the Italian population of the wolf motor function test in patients with stroke. Funct Neurol. 2018;33:229–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobilia M, Culicchia G, Tofani M, et al. Italian version of the jebsen-taylor hand function test for the assessment of hand disorders: A cross-sectional study. Am J Occup Ther. 2019;73:7303205080p1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeoto G, Iori F, De Santis R, et al. The outcome measures for loss of functionality in the activities of daily living of adults after stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019;26:236–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savona A, Ferralis L, Saffioti M, et al. Evaluation of intra- and inter-rater reliability and concurrent validity of the Italian version of the Jebsen–Taylor Hand Function Test in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Hand Ther. 2019;24:48–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggieri M, Palmisano B, Fratocchi G, et al. Validated fall risk assessment tools for use with older adults: a systematic review. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2018;36:331–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofani M, Galeoto G, Cazzetta D, et al. Validation of the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory in an Italian population with autism spectrum disorder: a cross-sectional study. Clin Ter. 2019;170:e460–e464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeoto G, Turriziani S, Berardi A, et al. Levels of Cognitive Functioning Assessment Scale: Italian cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Ann Ig. 2020;32:16–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tofani M, Candeloro C, Sabbadini M, et al. A study validating the Italian version of the Level of Sitting Scale in children with cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33:1810–1818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Tang W, Cui Y, Babenko O. Internal consistency: do we really know what it is and how to assess it? J Psychol Behav Sci. 2014;2:205–220.
   Google Scholar
• Lexell JE, Downham DY. How to assess the reliability of measurements in rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84:719–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner B. The correlation coefficient: its values range between +1/−1, or do they? J Target Meas Anal Mark. 2009;17:139–142.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. The standard rules on the equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities. New York (NY): United Nations Department of Public Information; 1994.
   Google Scholar