A person living with dementia learning to navigate an iPad: a case study

References

• Schrauf RW, Müller N. Dialogue and dementia: cognitive and communicative resources for engagement. New York (NY): Psychology Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Hydén LC. Entangled narratives: collaborative storytelling and the re-imagining of dementia. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kolanowski A, Bossen A, Hill N, et al. Factors associated with sustained attention during an activity intervention in persons with dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2012;33:233–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majlesi AR, Ekström A. Baking together-the coordination of actions in activities involving people with dementia. J Aging Stud. 2016;38:37–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis SL, Gillies J. Learning as a vehicle for individual and social transformation. Ther Recreation J. 2014;48:113–134.
   Google Scholar
• Thoft DS. Involving people with early-stage dementia in qualitative research about their lifeworld perspectives: development of a participatory research model [dissertation]. Aalborg (Denmark): Aalborg University; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Clare L, Wilson BA, Carter G, et al. Relearning face-name associations in early Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology. 2002;16:538–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Ballesteros R, Botella J, Zamarrón MD, et al. Cognitive plasticity in normal and pathological aging. Clin Interv Aging. 2002;7:15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Voigt-Radloff S, de Werd MM, Leonhart R, et al. Structured relearning of activities of daily living in dementia: the randomized controlled REDALI-DEM trial on errorless learning. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017;9:22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare L. Neuropsychological rehabilitation and people with dementia. New York (NY): Psychology Press; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• de Werd MM, Boelen D, Olde Rikkert MG, et al. Errorless learning of everyday tasks in people with dementia. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1177–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessels RP, Hensken LM. Effects of errorless skill learning in people with mild-to-moderate or severe dementia: a randomized controlled pilot study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;25:307–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiksdal BL, Houlihan D, Buchanan JA. Improving recall in a person with dementia: investigating the effectiveness of memory priming and spaced retrieval in an older adult with dementia. Clin Case Stud. 2012;11:393–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viccaro E, Sands E, Springer C. Spaced retrieval using static and dynamic images to improve face-name recognition: Alzheimer’s dementia and vascular dementia. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;28:1184–1197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glisky EL, Schacter DL, Tulving E. Learning and retention of computer-related vocabulary in memory-impaired patients: method of vanishing cues. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1986;8:292–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam C, Moss Z, Hodder K. Are two methods better than one? Evaluating the effectiveness of combining errorless learning with vanishing cues. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010;32:973–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camp CJ, Foss JW, O'Hanlon AM, et al. Memory interventions for persons with dementia. Appl Cognit Psychol. 1996;10:193–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn J, Clare L. Learning face-name associations in early-stage dementia: comparing the effects of errorless learning and effortful processing. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2007;17:735–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deppermann A. Changes in turn-design over interactional histories–the case of instructions in driving school lessons. In: Depperman A, Streeck J, editors. Time in embodied interaction. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): John Benjamins; 2018. p. 293–324.
   Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Melander H. Trajectories of Learning: embodied Interaction in Change [dissertation]. Uppsala (Sweden): Uppsala University; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Martin C. From other to self. Learning as Interactional Change [dissertation]. Uppsala (Sweden): Uppsala University; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rogoff B. Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlström F. Conversation analysis as a way of studying learning: an introduction to a special issue of SJER. Scand J Educ Res. 2009;53:103–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner J, Doehler SP, González-Martínez E. Longitudinal studies on the organization of social interaction. London (UK): Palgrave Macmillan; 2018. Chapter 1, Current developments and methodological challenges; p. 3–35.
   Google Scholar
• Clark HH. Using language. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bangerter A, Clark HH. Navigating joint projects with dialogue. Cogn Sci. 2003;27:195–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark HH, Schaefer EF. Contributing to discourse. Cogn Sci. 1989;13:259–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linell P. Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically. Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Greeno JG. A situative perspective on cognition and learning in interaction. In: Koschmann T, editor. Theories of learning and studies of instructional practice. New York (NY): Springer; 2011. p. 41–71.
   Google Scholar
• Knutsen D, Bangerter A, Mayor E. Procedural coordination in the matching task. Collabra Psychol. 2019;5:3.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky LS. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Linell P. Approaching dialogue: talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): John Benjamins Publishing; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Hydén LC. Cutting brussels sprouts: collaboration involving persons with dementia. J Aging Stud. 2014;29:115–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin C. Co-operative action: learning in doing: social, cognitive and computational perspectives. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Koschmann T. Conversation Analysis and Learning in Interaction. In: Chapelle CA, editor. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Chichester (UK): Wiley; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Clark HH, Wilkes-Gibbs D. Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition. 1986;22:1–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaac EA, Clark HH. References in conversation between experts and novices. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1987;116:26–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekström A, Ferm U, Samuelsson C. Digital communication support and Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia (London). 2017;16:711–731.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sacks H, Schegloff EA, Jefferson G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language. 1974;50:696–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linell P. Samtalskulturer: Kommunikativa verksamhetstyper i samhället. Vol. 1 och 2. Institutionen för Kultur och Kommunikation, Linköpings Universitet; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin MH, Cekaite A. Embodied family choreography: practices of control, care, and mundane creativity. New York (NY): Routledge; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ervin-Tripp S. Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Lang Soc. 1976;5:25–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin MH. Participation, affect, and trajectory in family directive/response sequences. Text Talk. 2006;26:515–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar