Direct assessment of emotional well-being from children with severe motor and communication impairment: a systematic review

References

• Statistics Canada. Participation and activity limitation survey. Canada: Statistics Canada; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Meijden A, Cox A, Murray B, et al. Students with disabilities in Dutch VET. Amsterdam, Netherlands; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s children. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2020. (Cat. no. CWS 69).
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. Students with disabilities. Washington (DC): National Center for Education Statistics; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hidecker MJC, Paneth N, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System for individuals with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53(8):704–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson AC, Krumlinde Sundholm L, Rösblad B, et al. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48(7):549–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, et al. Gross motor function classification system expanded and revised. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;39(4):214–223.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons GS, Walla P, Arthur-Kelly M. Towards improved ways of knowing children with profound multiple disabilities: introducing startle reflex modulation. Dev Neurorehabil. 2013;16(5):340–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memarian N, Blain-Moraes S, Chau T. Towards a physiological signal-based access solution for a non-verbal adolescent with severe and multiple disabilities. Dev Neurorehabil. 2014;17(4):270–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blain S, Mckeever P, Chau T. Bedside computer access for an individual with severe and multiple disabilities: a case study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(5):359–369.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karlsson P, Bech A, Stone H, et al. Eyes on communication: trialling eye-gaze control technology in young children with dyskinetic cerebral palsy. Dev Neurorehabil. 2019;22(2):134–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen E, Friedman JN, Mahant S, et al. The impact of a complex care clinic in a children's hospital. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;36(4):574–582.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn E, Kang J. Supporting young children with multiple disabilities: what do we know and what do we still need to learn?. Top Early Child Spec Educ. 2012;31(4):241–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mclaughlin C. Emotional well-being and its relationship to schools and classrooms: a critical reflection. Br J Guid Counc. 2008;36(4):353–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener E, Larsen RJ. The experience of emotional well-being. In: Handbook of emotions. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 1993. p. 405–415.
   Google Scholar
• Larson R, Lampman-Petraitis C. Daily emotional states as reported by children and adolescents. Soc Res Child Dev. 1989;60(5):1250–1260.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton M, Redmond G. Conceptualisation of social and emotional wellbeing for children and young people, and policy implications. Sydney (Australia): Australian Research Alliance for Children and Youth; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman MEP, Steen TA, Park N, et al. Positive psychology progress: empirical validation of intervention. Posit Psychol. 2005;42:874–884.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl RE, Gunnar MR. Heightened stress responsiveness and emotional reactivity during pubertal maturation: implications for psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol. 2009;21(1):1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kruithof K, Willems D, Erik FVE. Parents’ knowledge of their child with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: an interpretative synthesis. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil JARID. 2020;1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Liptak GS, O'Donnell M, Conaway M, et al. Health status of children with moderate to severe cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43(6):364–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt ML, Hill EL. Anxiety profiles in children with and without developmental coordination disorder. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(4):1253–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missiuna C, Cairney J, Pollock N, et al. Psychological distress in children with developmental coordination disorder and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(5):1198–1207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolman C, Resnick MD, Harris LJ, et al. Emotional well-being among adolescents with and without chronic conditions. J Adolesc Heal. 1994;15(3):199–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce WF, Davies D, Raman SR, et al. Emotional health of Canadian and Finnish students with disabilities or chronic conditions. Int J Rehabil Res. 2009;32(2):154–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadman R, Botting N, Durkin K, et al. Changes in emotional health symptoms in adolescents with specific language impairment. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2011;46(6):641–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti-Ramsden G, Botting N. Emotional health in adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI). J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008;49(5):516–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkin K, Conti-Ramsden G. Young people with specific language impairment: a review of social and emotional functioning in adolescence. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2010;26(2):105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanello E, Calugi S, Rucci P, et al. Continuity of care in children with special healthcare needs: a qualitative study of family's perspectives. Ital J Pediatr. 2015;41(7):7–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bailey S, Boddy K, Briscoe S, et al. Involving disabled children and young people as partners in research: a systematic review. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41(4):505–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpelaere I, White A, Bekkering GE, et al. Patient-reported and proxy-reported outcome measures for the assessment of health-related quality of life among patients receiving enteral feeding: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016;14(7):45–75.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King G, Batorowicz B, Rigby P, et al. Development of a measure to assess youth self-reported experiences of activity settings (SEAS). Int J Disabil Dev Educ. 2014;61(1):44–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upton P, Lawford J, Eiser C. Parent-child agreement across child health-related quality of life instruments: a review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2008;17(6):895–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Gibson BE, Mistry B, et al. An integrated methods study of the experiences of youth with severe disabilities in leisure activity settings: the importance of belonging, fun, and control and choice. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(19):1626–1635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih C-T, Shih C-H, Luo C-H. Design of an actively assistive communication device for a multiple handicapped person. J Med Biol Eng. 2007;27(2):65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Saturno CE, Garcia Ramirez AR, Conte MJ, et al. An augmentative and alternative communication tool for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Behav Inf Technol. 2015;34(6):632–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valiquette C, Sutton A, Ska B. A graphic symbol tool for the evaluation of communication, satisfaction and priorities of individuals with intellectual disability who use a speech generating device. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2010;26(3):303–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu AW, O’Connor TM, Beauchamp MR, et al. What do US and Canadian parents do to encourage or discourage physical activity among their 5-12 year old children?. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moksnes UK, Espnes GA, Lillefjell M. Sense of coherence and emotional health in adolescents. J Adolesc. 2012;35(2):433–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veale JF, Watson RJ, Peter T, et al. Mental health disparities among Canadian transgender youth. J Adolesc Health. 2017;60(1):44–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgestig M, Sandqvist J, Ahlsten G, et al. Gaze-based assistive technology in daily activities in children with severe physical impairments - an intervention study. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017;20(3):129–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushki A, Andrews AJ, Power SD, et al. Classification of activity engagement in individuals with severe physical disabilities using signals of the peripheral nervous system. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health Research. York U of PROSPERO. York: National Institute for Health Research.
   Google Scholar
• Canada G of Benefits for children under 25; 2018. [cited 2020 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/services/benefits/publicpensions/cpp/cpp-childrens-benefit.html
   Google Scholar
• Riley M, Locke AB, Skye EP. Health maintenance in school-aged children: Part II. Counseling recommendations. Am Acad Fam Phys. 2011;83(6):689–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne. Engaging with and assessing the adolescent patient. Melbourne, Australia: The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Harris MA, Donnellan MB, Trzesniewski KH. The lifespan self-esteem scale: initial validation of a new measure of global self-esteem. J Pers Assess. 2018;100(1):84–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koegel LK, Valdez-Menchaca MC, Koegel RL. Autism: social communication difficulties and related behaviors. In: Van Hasselt VB, Hersen M, editors. Advanced abnormal psychology. Boston (MA): Springer; 1994. p. 165–187.
   Google Scholar
• Happé F, Ronald A, Plomin R. Time to give up on a single explanation for autism. Nat Neurosci. 2006;9(10):1218–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller SA, Forrest JL. Enhancing your practice through evidence-based decision making: PICO, learning how to ask good questions. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2001;1(2):136–141 .
   Google Scholar
• Veritas Health Innovation. Covidence systematic review software [Internet]. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation; 2019. Available from: www.covidence.org
   Google Scholar
• Lui M, Falk TH, Chau T. Disability and rehabilitation: assistive technology development and evaluation of a dual-output vocal cord vibration switch for persons with multiple disabilities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(1):82–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Memarian N, Venetsanopoulos AN, Chau T. Body functions and structures pertinent to infrared thermography-based access for clients with severe motor disabilities. Assist Technol. 2011;23(2):53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Y-L, Chen M-C, Yen C-C, et al. Assisting an adolescent with cerebral palsy to entry text by using the chorded keyboard. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of Computers Helping People with Special Needs; 2008 July 9–11; Linz, Austria. p. 1177–1183.
   Google Scholar
• Batorowicz B, Campbell F, von Tetzchner S, et al. Social participation of school-aged children who use communication aids: the views of children and parents. Augment Altern Commun. 2014;30(3):237–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson V, Pashen J, Johnston L. Tech4Teens: an assistive technology group to enhance participation of young people with cerebral palsy in social and leisure activities. Dev Med Child Neurol AusACPDM Abstr. 2012;54(5):11–74.
   Google Scholar
• American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Augmentative and alternative communication. Rockville (MD): American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2020. [cited 2020 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.asha.org/PRPSpecificTopic.aspx?folderid=8589942773&section=Resources
   Google Scholar
• Beukelman DR, Light JC. Augmentative and alternative communication. 5th ed. Baltimore, London, Sydney: Brookes Publishing; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida MA, Helena M, Piza M. [Adaptation of the picture exchange communication system in a school context]. Pro Fono. 2005;17(2):233–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hörmeyer I, Renner G. Confirming and denying in co-construction processes: a case study of an adult with cerebral palsy and two familiar partners. Augment Altern Commun. 2013;29(3):259–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhart LJ, Porter G. Partner-assisted communication strategies for children who face multiple challenges. Düsseldorf: ISAAC; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Radtke JV, Baumann BM, Garrett KL, et al. Case discussions in palliative medicine listening to the voiceless patient: case reports in assisted communication in the intensive care unit. J Palliat Med. 2011;14(6):791–795.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Light J, Mcnaughton D. Putting people first: re-thinking the role of technology in augmentative and alternative communication intervention. Augment Altern Commun. 2013;29(4):299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Midtlin HS, Naess KB, Taxt T, et al. What communication strategies do AAC users want their communication partners to use? A preliminary study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(14):1260–1267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke M, Bloch S, Wilkinson R. Speaker transfer in children's peer conversation: completing communication-aid-mediated contributions . Augment Altern Commun. 2013;29(1):37–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, Reilly MFO, et al. Post-coma persons emerging from a minimally conscious state with multiple disabilities make technology-aided phone contacts with relevant partners. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(10):3190–3196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black R, Waller A, Reddington J. A mobile phone based personal narrative system. Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS '11); 2011 Oct; Dundee, Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Stasolla F, Caffo AO, Picucci L, et al. Assistive technology for promoting choice behaviors in three children with cerebral palsy and severe communication impairments. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(9):2694–2700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi M, Takeda K, Onishi M, et al. Non-verbal communication method based on a biochemical marker for people with severe motor and intellectual disabilities. J Int Med Res. 2006;34(1):30–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray J, Sandberg AD, Smith MM, et al. Communicating the unknown: descriptions of pictured scenes and events presented on video by children and adolescents using aided communication and their peers using natural speech. Augment Altern Commun. 2018;34(1):30–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan J, Falk TH, Teachman G, et al. Evaluation of a non-invasive vocal cord vibration switch as an alternative access pathway for an individual with hypotonic cerebral palsy – a case study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(1):69–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bullock A, Dalrymple GF, Danca JM. Communication and the nonverbal, multihandicapped child. Am J Occup Ther. 1975;29(3):150–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloch S, Beeke S. Co-constructed talk in the conversations of people with dysarthria and aphasia. Clin Linguist Phon. 2008;22(12):974–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon-Rice P, Soto G. Co-construction as a facilitative factor in supporting the personal narratives of children who use augmentative and alternative communication. Commun Disord Q. 2011;32(2):70–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, O'Reilly MF, et al. Eye- and mouth-opening movements replacing head and hand responses in a microswitch program for an adolescent with deteriorating motor condition. Percept Mot Skills. 2007;105(1):107–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength recommendations. BMJ Open. 2004;328:1490–1494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Hamilton (Canada): Cochrane; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin S, Booth A, Glenton C, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl. 1):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Monahan S, Kratochwill T, Lipscomb S. What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) standards for evaluating single case designs (SCDs). Evanston (IL): Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Reilly MFO, Singh NN, et al. Impact of stimulation versus microswitch-based programs on indices of happiness of people with profound multiple disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2002;23(2):149–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, O'Reilly MF, Singh NN, et al. Stimulation and microswitch-based programs for enhancing indices of happiness: a maintenance assessment. Behav Intervent. 2003;18(1):53–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreekumar S, Sangeetha GS, Matthew BS. Advancement to higher communicative functions with transition to iPad app - a case report. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(4):480–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, Reilly MFO, et al. Further evaluation of a telephone technology for enabling persons with multiple disabilities and lack of speech to make phone contacts with socially relevant partners. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34(11):4178–4183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasolla F, Caffo AO, Damiani R, et al. Assistive technology-based programs to promote communication and leisure activities by three children emerged from a minimal conscious state. Cogn Process. 2015;16(1):69–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson BE, King G, Teachman G, et al. Assembling activity/setting participation with disabled young people. Sociol Health Illn. 2017;39(4):497–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Batorowicz B, Rigby P, et al. The leisure activity settings and experiences of youth with severe disabilities. Dev Neurorehabil. 2014;17(4):259–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norén N, Svensson EVA, Telford J. Participants' dynamic orientation to folder navigation when using a VOCA with a touch screen in talk-in-interaction . Augment Altern Commun. 2013;29(1):20–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petry K, Maes B. Identifying expressions of pleasure and displeasure by persons with profound and multiple disabilities. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2006;31(1):28–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilesjo MS, Norén N. Teaching communication aid use in everyday conversation. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2017;33(3):241–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tönsing KM. Supporting the production of graphic symbol combinations by children with limited speech: a comparison of two AAC systems. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2016;28(1):5–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni GE, Singh NN, Reilly MFO, et al. Assessing the effects of stimulation versus microswitch-based programmes on indices of happiness of students with multiple disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006;50(Pt 10):739–747.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stasolla F, Caffo AO, Perilli V, et al. A microswitch-based program for promoting initial ambulation responses: an evaluation with two girls with multiple disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 2017;50(2):345–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancioni G, O'Reilly M, Singh N, et al. Technology-assisted programs for promoting leisure or communication engagement in two persons with pervasive motor or multiple disabilities. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(2):108–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang C-H, Huang H-C, Chuang L-Y, et al. A mobile communication aid system for persons with physical disabilities. Math Comput Model. 2008;47(3–4):318–327.
   Google Scholar
• Ann OC, Lau BT. Biometrics based assistive communication tool for children with special needs. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference IT Asia Biometrics; 2011 July 12–13; Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Berrezueta-Guzmán J, Coronel-Maldonado F, Serpa-Andrade L, et al. A didactic transmitter to support the communication and learning process of children with cerebral palsy. MATEC Web Conf. 2016;42:05004.
   Google Scholar
• Black R, Waller A, Turner R, et al. Supporting personal narrative for children with complex communication needs. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact. 2012;19(2):1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis CA, Reichle J, Southard K, et al. Teaching children with severe disabilities to utilize nonobligatory conversational opportunities: an application of high-probability requests. JASH. 1998;23(1):57–68.
   Google Scholar
• Goossens’ C. Aided communication intervention before assessment: a case study of a child with cerebral palsy. AAC Augment Altern Commun. 1989;5(1):14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper J, Connell TM, Flett PJ. Blissymbols and manual signs: a multimodal approach to intervention in a case of multiple disability. Augment Altern Commun. 1987;3(2):68–76.
   Google Scholar
• Olaszi P, Koutny I, Kalman SL. From bliss symbols to grammatically correct voice output: a communication tool for people with disabilities. Int J SPEECH Technol. 2002;5(1):49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto M, Gardner H. Communicative interaction between a non-speaking child with cerebral palsy and her mother using an iPadTM. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2014;30(2):207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudin NJ, Gilmore LD, Roy SH, et al. New motor control assessment techniques for evaluating individuals with severe handicaps: a case study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1987;24(3):57–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith MM, Batorowicz B, Sandberg AD, et al. Constructing narratives to describe video events using aided communication. Augment Altern Commun. 2018;34(1):40–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto G, Yu B, Kelso J. Effectiveness of multifaceted narrative intervention on the stories told by a 12-year-old girl who uses AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2008;24(1):76–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasolla F, Caffò AO, Perilli V, et al. Assistive technology for promoting adaptive skills of children with cerebral palsy: ten cases evaluation. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(5):489–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steadman JW, Ferris CD, Rhodine CN. Prosthetic communication device. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980;61(2):93–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickenden M. Whose voice is that?: Issues of identity, voice and representation arising in an ethnographic study of the lives of disabled teenagers who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC). Disabil Stud Q. 2011;31(4).
   Google Scholar
• Batorowicz B, Stadskleiv K, von Tetzchner S, et al. Children who use communication aids instructing peer and adult partners during play-based activity. Augment Altern Commun. 2016;32(2):105–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therrien MCS, Light J, Pope L. Systematic review of the effects of interventions to promote peer interactions for children who use aided AAC. Augment Altern Commun. 2016;32(2):81–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur M, Bochner S, Butterfield N. Enhancing peer interactions within the context of play. Int J Disabil Dev Educ. 1999;46(3):367–381.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen B, Bukowski WM, Aunola K, et al. Friendship moderates prospective associations between social isolation and adjustment problems in young children. Child Dev. 2007;78(4):1395–1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar