References References marked with an asterisk indicated studies included in the scoping review
- Guyer C, Uzeta M. Assistive technology obligations for postsecondary education institutions. J Access Serv. 2009;6(1–2):12–35.
- Ontario [Internet]. Toronto (ON): Ontario Ministry of Community and Social Services. About the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005. 2012 [cited 2019 September 5]. Available from: http://www.mcss.gov.on.ca/en/mcss/publications/accessibility/aoda2005.aspx
- NEADS [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): National Educational Association of Disabled Students. Enhancing accessibility in post-secondary education institution; 2013 [cited 2019 September 5]. Available from: http://www.neads.ca/en/norc/eag/policies.php
- Markoulakis R, Kirsh B. Difficulties for university students with mental health problems: a critical interpretive synthesis. Rev High Educ. 2013;37(1):77–100.
- Holmes A, Silvestri R. Assistive technology use by students with LD in postsecondary education: a case of application before investigation? Can J Schol Psychol. 2012;27(1):81–97.
- Stodden RA, Whelley T, Chang C, et al. Current status of educational support provisions to students with disabilities in postsecondary education. J Vocat Rehabil. 2001;16:189–198.
- Cobb A. Assistive technology enhancing the life skills of students with learning disabilities. Distance Learning. 2011;8:45–57.
- Gillespie A, Best C, O’Neill B. Cognitive function and assistive technology for cognition: a systematic review. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012;18(1):1–19.
- Arthanat S, Simmons C, Favreau M. Exploring occupational justice in consumer perspectives on assistive technology. Can J Occup Ther. 2012;79(5):309–319.
- Boydell KM, Hodgins M, Pignatiello A, et al. Using technology to deliver mental health services to children and youth: a scoping review. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;23(2):87–99.
- Seko Y, Kidd S, Wiljer D, et al. Youth mental health interventions via mobile phones: a scoping review. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17(9):591–602.
- Renton T, Tang H, Ennis N, et al. Web-based intervention programs for depression: a scoping review and evaluation. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(9):e209.
- Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Method. 2005;8(1):19–32.
- *Agarwal N, Kumar V. An invisible student population: accommodating and serving college students with lupus. Work. 2017;56(1):165–173.
- *Grabinger S. A framework for supporting postsecondary learners with psychiatric disabilities in online environments. Electron J E-Learn. 2010;8(2):101–110.
- *Malcolm MP, Roll MC. Assistive technology outcomes in postsecondary students with disabilities: the influence of diagnoses, gender, and class-level. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;12(8):857–867.
- *Boyd V. Resisting the tick box: reflexive use of educational technologies in developing student identities and challenging higher education constructions of disability based on notions of conformity and consistency. Int J Disabil Dev Ed. 2014;61(4):377–387.
- *Gitlow L, Abdelaal F, Etienne A, et al. Exploring the current usage and preferences of everyday technology among people with serious mental illnesses. Occup Ther Ment Health. 2017;33(1):1–14.
- *Kiuhara SA, Huefner DS. Students with psychiatric disabilities in higher education settings: the Americans with Disabilities Act and beyond. J Disabil Policy Stu. 2008;19(2):103–113.
- *Nolan C, Quinn S, MacCobb S. Use of text messaging in a mental health service for university students. Occup Ther Ment Health. 2011;27(2):103–125.
- Brockelman K, Scheyett A. Faculty perceptions of accommodations, strategies, and psychiatric advance directives for university students with mental illnesses. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2015;38(4):342–348.
- Bech H. Understanding the experiences of students with psychiatric disabilities: a foundation for creation conditions and support and success. New Dir Student Serv. 2011;134:73–94.