991
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Case Report

Basic principles for the development of an AI-based tool for assistive technology decision making

, &
Pages 778-781 | Received 31 May 2020, Accepted 27 Aug 2020, Published online: 04 Dec 2020

References

  • Jamieson M, Cullen B, McGee-Lennon M, et al. The efficacy of cognitive prosthetic technology for people with memory impairments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3–4):419–444.
  • Perelmutter B, McGregor KK, Gordon KR. Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: an evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis. Comput Educ. 2017;114:139–163..
  • Andreopoulou G, Mercer TH, van der Linden ML. Walking measures to evaluate assistive technology for foot drop in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of psychometric properties. Gait Posture. 2018;61:55–66.
  • Brims L, Oliver K. Effectiveness of assistive technology in improving the safety of people with dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Mental Health. 2019;23(8):942–951.
  • McNicholl A, Casey H, Desmond D, et al. The impact of assistive technology use for students with disabilities in higher education: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;1–14. DOI:10.1080/17483107.2019.1642395
  • Perfect E, Jaiswal A, Davies TC. Systematic review: investigating the effectiveness of assistive technology to enable internet access for individuals with deafblindness. Assist Technol. 2019;31(5):276–285.
  • Khasnabis C. 2019. Closing remarks, GReAT consultation, Geneva, 22 and 23 August 2019.
  • de Witte L, Steel E, Gupta S, et al. Assistive technology provision: towards an international framework for assuring availability and accessibility of affordable high-quality assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(5):467–472.
  • World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
  • Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, et al. Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(21):1321–1331.
  • Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, et al. A framework for modelling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(1):1–8.
  • Scherer M. 2017. Matching person and technology. In: Maheu M, Drude K, Wright S, editors. Career paths in telemental health. Cham: Springer.
  • Arthanat S, Elsaesser L-J, Bauer S. A survey of assistive technology service providers in the USA. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017;12(8):789–800.
  • Banes D. A commentary on influences on selection of assistive technology for young children in South Africa: perspectives from rehabilitation professionals. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(8):758–759.
  • Banes, D. Pervasive and emerging technologies and consumer motivation. In Everyday technologies in healthcare. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group; 2019. p. 123–142.
  • Scherer MJ. The change in emphasis from people to person: introduction to the special issue on Assistive Technology. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1–3):1–4.
  • Federici S, Corradi F, Meloni F, et al. A person-centered assistive technology service delivery model: a framework for device selection and assignment. Life Span Disabil. 2014;17:175–198.
  • Federici S, Borsci S. Providing assistive technology in Italy: the perceived delivery process quality as affecting abandonment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11(1):22–31.
  • Cruz D, Emmel M, Manzini M, et al. Assistive technology accessibility and abandonment: challenges for occupational therapists. Open J Occup Ther. 2016;4(1):1–10.
  • Petrie H, Carmien S, Lewis A. 2018. Assistive technology abandonment: research realities and potentials. In: Miesenberger K, Kouroupetroglou G, editors. Computers helping people with special needs. ICCHP 2018. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 10897. Cham: Springer.
  • MacLachlan M, Scherer MJ. Systems thinking for assistive technology: a commentary on the GREAT summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(5):492–496.
  • MacLachlan M, Banes D, Bell D, et al. Assistive technology policy: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(5):454–466.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.