User-centred design, evaluation, and refinement of a wireless power wheelchair charging system

References

• Okoro CA, Hollis NTD, Cyrus AC, et al. Prevalence of disabilities and health care access by disability status and type among adults – United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67:882–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye SH, Kang T, LaPlante MP. Mobility device use in the United States. Disability Statistics Report. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Dicianno BE, Cooper RA, Coltellaro J. Joystick control for powered mobility: current state of technology and future directions. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2010;21:79–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooper RA, Thorman T, Cooper R, et al. Driving characteristics of electric-powered wheelchair users: how far, fast, and often do people drive? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:250–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonenblum SE, Sprigle S, Harris FH, et al. Characterization of power wheelchair use in the home and community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:486–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonenblum SE, Sprigle S, Lopez RA. Manual wheelchair use: bouts of mobility in everyday life. Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:753165–753167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bassett DR, Wyatt HR, Thompson H, et al. Pedometer-measured physical activity and health behaviors in U.S. adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1819–1825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr L, Langbein WE, Skaar SB. Adequacy of power wheelchair control interfaces for persons with severe disabilities: a clinical survey. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37:353–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauzlarich JJ, Ulrich V, Bresler M, et al. Wheelchair batteries: driving cycles and testing. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1983;20:31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kauzlarich JJ. Wheelchair batteries II: capacity, sizing, and life. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1990;27:163–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hussain S, Ali MU, Nengroo SH, et al. Semiactive hybrid energy management system: a solution for electric wheelchairs. Electronics. 2019;8:345–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding D, Leister E, Cooper RA, et al. Usage of tilt-in-space, recline, and elevation seating functions in natural environment of wheelchair users. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:973–984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingemans LM, Hawn JM. Mobility and equipment for the ventilator-dependent tetraplegic. Paraplegia. 1978;16:175–183.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curtin M, Clarke H. Choosing a powered wheelchair: the choice of a client dependent on a ventilator. Br J Occup Ther. 1997;60:156–160.
   Google Scholar
• Kailes JI. Emergency power planning for people who use electricity and battery dependent assistive technology and medical devices. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin M. Technology for people with tetraplegia, part 2: environmental control units. Br J Occup Ther. 1994;57:419–424.
   Google Scholar
• Carter J. Environmental control systems for people with severe disabilities. Int J Ther Rehabil. 1997;4:646–653.
   Google Scholar
• Covic GA, Boys JT. Modern trends in inductive power transfer for transportation applications. IEEE J Emerg Sel Topics Power Electron. 2013;1:28–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong WX, Liu X, Hui SYR. A novel single-layer winding array and receiver coil structure for contactless battery charging systems with free-positioning and localized charging features. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2011;58:4136–4144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campi T, Cruciani S, Palandrani F, et al. Wireless power transfer charging system for AIMDs and pacemakers. IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Techn. 2016;64:633–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carta R, Tortora G, Thoné J, et al. Wireless powering for a self-propelled and steerable endoscopic capsule for stomach inspection. Biosens Bioelectron. 2009;25:845–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh J, Lee SW, Lee WY, et al. Narrow-width inductive power transfer system for online electrical vehicles. IEEE Trans Power Electron. 2011;26:3666–3679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Huh J, Park C, et al. On-Line Electric Vehicle using inductive power transfer system. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition, ECCE 2010; 2010 Sep 12–16; Atlanta, GA. IEEE; 2010. p. 1598–1601.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan N, Cocar I, Amely T, et al. A practical implementation of wireless power transfer systems for socially interactive robots. 2015 IEEE Energy Convers Congr Expo ECCE. Atlanta: IEEE; 2015; 4935–4942.
   Google Scholar
• Kujala S. User involvement: a review of the benefits and challenges. Behav Inf Technol. 2003;22:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin J, Chisnell D. Handbook of usability testing: how to plan, design, and conduct effective tests. 2nd ed. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley; Med. Interna Mex; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• ]Vredenburg K, Mao JY, Smith PW, et al. A survey of user-centered design practice. Conf Hum Factors Comput Syst – Proc. 2002. 4:471–478.
   Google Scholar
• Dorrington P, Wilkinson C, Tasker L, et al. User-centered design method for the design of assistive switch devices to improve user experience, accessibility, and independence. J Usability Stud. 2016;11:66–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer B, Peine A, Östlund B. The importance of user involvement: a systematic review of involving older users in technology design. Gerontologist. 2019;gnz163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladner RE. Design for user empowerment. Interactions. 2015;22:24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Newell AF, Gregor P, Morgan M, et al. User-sensitive inclusive design. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2011;10:235–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane JP, Usiak DJ, Stone VI, et al. The voice of the customer: consumers define the ideal battery charger. Assist Technol. 1997;9:130–139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azad A, Tavakoli R, Pratik U, et al. A smart autonomous WPT system for electric wheelchair applications with free-positioning charging feature. IEEE J Emerg Sel Top Power Electron. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan D. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications, Inc.; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn K. Problems and benefits of requirements gathering with focus groups: a case study. Int J Hum-Comput Interact. 2000;12:309–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Krefting L. Rigor in qualitative research: the assessment of trustworthiness. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:214–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger R. Analyzing focus group interviews. Spotlight on research. J Wound, Ostomy, Cont Nurs. 2006;33:478–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padir T. Towards personalized smart wheelchairs: lessons learned from discovery interviews. Proc Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc EMBS. 2015;2015:5016–5019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jipp M. Levels of automation: effects of individual differences on wheelchair control performance and user acceptance. Theor Issues Ergon Sci. 2014;15:479–504.
   Google Scholar