A glimpse into smartphone screen reader use among blind teenagers in rural Nepal

References

• Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012;96(5):614–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solebo AL, Rahi J. Epidemiology, aetiology and management of visual impairment in children. Arch Dis Child. 2014;99(4):375–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhakal B. Statistical trends in literacy rate in Nepal. IOSR J Appl Chem. 2018;11(11):71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Pokharel GP, Regmi G, Shrestha SK, et al. Prevalence of blindness and cataract surgery in Nepal. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82(6):600–605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnyawali S, Shrestha JB, Bhattarai D, et al. Optical needs of students with low vision in integrated schools of Nepal. Optom Vis Sci. 2012;89(12):1752–1756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly SM. Use of assistive technology by students with visual impairments: findings from a national survey. J Visual Impair Blind. 2009;103(8):470–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy T, Pal J, Marballi T, et al. An analysis of screen reader use in India. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development; 2012. p. 149–158.
   Google Scholar
• Pal J, Viswanathan A, Chandra P, et al. Agency in assistive technology adoption: visual impairment and smartphone use in Bangalore. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM; 2017. p. 5929–5940.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues A, Montague K, Nicolau H, et al. Getting smartphones to talkback: understanding the smartphone adoption process of blind users. Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility. New York, NY: ACM; 2015. p. 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Buzzi MC, Buzzi M, Leporini B, et al. Analyzing visually impaired people’s touch gestures on smartphones. Multimed Tools Appl. 2017;76(4):5141–5169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vashistha A, Cutrell E, Dell N, et al. Social media platforms for low-income blind people in India. Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility. New York, NY: ACM; 2015. p. 259–272.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mouh N, Al-Khalifa HS. The accessibility and usage of smartphones by Arab-speaking visually impaired people. Int J Pervas Comp Comm. 2015;11(4):418–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal J, Gogineni Y, Sanghavi K, et al. Local-language digital information in India: challenges and opportunities for screen readers. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development; 2012. p. 318–325.
   Google Scholar
• Pal J, Pradhan M, Shah M, et al. Assistive technology for vision-impairments: an agenda for the ICTD community. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web; 2011. p. 513–522.
   Google Scholar
• Ari IA, Inan FA. Assistive technologies for students with disabilities: a survey of access and use in Turkish universities. Turk Online J Educ Technol. 2010;9(2):40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Parker AT, Smith DW, et al. Assistive technology for students with visual impairments: challenges and needs in teachers’ preparation programs and practice. J Visual Impair Blind. 2011;105(4):197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vashistha A, Brady E, Thies W, et al. Educational content creation and sharing by low-income visually impaired people in India. Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Symposium on Computing for Development; New York, NY: ACM; 2014. p. 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Boiani JA, Barili SR, Medola FO, et al. On the non-disabled perceptions of four common mobility devices in Norway: a comparative study based on semantic differentials. Technol Disabil. 2019;31(1–2):15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Shinohara K, Wobbrock JO. In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; New York, NY: ACM; 2011. p. 705–714.
   Google Scholar
• Shinohara K, Wobbrock JO. Self-conscious or self-confident? A diary study conceptualizing the social accessibility of assistive technology. ACM Trans Access Comput. 2016;8(2):1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandnes FE. What do low-vision users really want from smart glasses? Faces, text and perhaps no glasses at all. International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 187–194.
   Google Scholar
• Pal J, Lakshmanan M. Assistive technology and the employment of people with vision impairments in India. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development; 2012. p. 307–317.
   Google Scholar
• Zajicek M, Powell C, Reeves C. A web navigation tool for the blind. Proceedings of the Third International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies. New York, NY: ACM; 1998. p. 204–206.
   Google Scholar
• Bahadur BK, Eika E. Impact of sentence length on the readability of web for screen reader users. Proceedings International Conference on Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction. Cham: Springer; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• dos Santos AD, Medola FO, Cinelli MJ, et al. Are electronic white canes better than traditional canes? A comparative study with blind and blindfolded participants. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2020. DOI:10.1007/s10209-020-00712-z
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Wu S, Reynolds L, et al. A face recognition application for people with visual impairments: understanding use beyond the lab. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; New York, NY: ACM; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas R, Barker L, Rubin G, et al. Assistive technology for children and young people with low vision. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD011350.pub2
   Google Scholar
• Milne LR, Bennett CL, Ladner RE, et al. BraillePlay: educational smartphone games for blind children. Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility. New York, NY: ACM; 2014. p. 137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez J, Saenz M, Garrido JM. Usability of a multimodal video game to improve navigation skills for blind children. ACM Trans Access Comput. 2010;3(2):1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan B, Folmer E. Blind hero: enabling guitar hero for the visually impaired. Proceedings of the 10th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. New York, NY: ACM; 2008. p. 169–176.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez J, Flores H. Memory enhancement through audio. Proceedings of the 6th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. New York, NY: ACM; 2003. p. 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Milne LR, Baker CM, Ladner RE. Blocks4all demonstration: a blocks-based programming environment for blind children. Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. New York, NY: ACM; 2017. p. 313–314.
   Google Scholar
• Fuglerud KS, Tjøstheim I, Gunnarsson BR, et al. Use of social media by people with visual impairments: usage levels, attitudes and barriers. International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. p. 565–572.
   Google Scholar
• Wentz B, Lazar J. Are separate interfaces inherently unequal? An evaluation with blind users of the usability of two interfaces for a social networking platform. Proceedings of the 2011 iConference; 2011. p. 91–97.
   Google Scholar
• Wu S, Adamic LA. Visually impaired users on an online social network. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM; 2014. p. 3133–3142.
   Google Scholar
• Brady EL, Zhong Y, Morris MR, et al. Investigating the appropriateness of social network question asking as a resource for blind users. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work; 2013. p. 1225–1236.
   Google Scholar
• Jayant C, Ji H, White S, et al. Supporting blind photography. Proceedings of the 13th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. New York, NY: ACM; 2011. p. 203–210.
   Google Scholar
• Adams D, Kurniawan S, Herrera C, et al. Blind photographers and VizSnap: a long-term study. Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. New York, NY: ACM; 2016. p. 201–208.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett CL, Jane E, Mott ME, et al. How teens with visual impairments take, edit, and share photos on social media. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sultana S, Ahmed SI. Witchcraft and HCI: morality, modernity, and postcolonial computing in rural Bangladesh. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: ACM; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor J, Bradbury‐Jones C, Lund P. Witchcraft‐related abuse and murder of children with albinism in Sub‐Saharan Africa: a conceptual review. Child Abuse Rev. 2019;28(1):13–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grussenmeyer W, Folmer E. Accessible touchscreen technology for people with visual impairments: a survey. ACM Trans Access Comput. 2017;9(2):1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues A, Santos A, Montague K, et al. Understanding the authoring and playthrough of nonvisual smartphone tutorials. Proceedings IFIP Conference on Human–Computer Interaction. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 42–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ethnologue. What are the top 200 most spoken languages? "Summary by language size"; [Internet]; 2020; [cited 2020 Apr 18]. Available from: https://www.ethnologue.com/guides/ethnologue200
   Google Scholar