Patient experience using digital therapy “Vigo” for stroke patient recovery: a qualitative descriptive study

References

• Stinear CM, Lang CE, Zeiler S, et al. Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(4):348–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugliese M, Ramsay T, Shamloul R, et al. RecoverNow: a mobile tablet-based therapy platform for early stroke rehabilitation. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0210725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui SK, Nguyen MH. Elderly stroke rehabilitation: overcoming the complications and its associated challenges. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2018;2018:9853837.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baig MM, GholamHosseini H, Connolly MJ. Mobile healthcare applications: system design review, critical issues and challenges. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2015;38(1):23–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Abel KT, Janecek JT, et al. Home-based technologies for stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2019;123:11–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Des Roches CA, Balachandran I, Ascenso EM, et al. Effectiveness of an impairment-based individualized rehabilitation program using an iPad-based software platform. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran S, Roches CD, Balachandran I, et al. Development of an impairment-based individualized treatment workflow using an iPad-based software platform. Semin Speech Lang. 2014;35(1):38–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi YH, Park HK, Paik NJ. A telerehabilitation approach for chronic aphasia following stroke. Telemed J E Health. 2016;22(5):434–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameer K, Ali K. iPad use in stroke neuro-rehabilitation. Geriatrics. 2017;2(1):2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark BC, Warburton EA. Improved language in chronic aphasia after self-delivered iPad speech therapy. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2018;28(5):818–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurland J, Wilkins AR, Stokes P. iPractice: piloting the effectiveness of a tablet-based home practice program in aphasia treatment. Semin Speech Lang. 2014;35(1):51–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen HK, Tistad M, Koch L, et al. The importance of patient involvement in stroke rehabilitation. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahdat S, Hamzehgardeshi L, Hessam S, et al. Patient involvement in health care decision making: a review. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(1):e12454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventola CL. Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. P T. 2014;39(5):356–364.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Choi MJ, Kim H, Nah HW, et al. Digital therapeutics: emerging new therapy for neurologic deficits after stroke. J Stroke. 2019;21(3):242–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piran P, Thomas J, Kunnakkat S, et al. Medical mobile applications for stroke survivors and caregivers. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;28(11):104318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capela NA, Lemaire ED, Baddour N, et al. Evaluation of a smartphone human activity recognition application with able-bodied and stroke participants. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2016;13:5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira J, Gamito P, Morais D, et al. Cognitive assessment of stroke patients with mobile apps: a controlled study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;199:103–107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ogourtsova T, Archambault PS, Lamontagne A. Post-stroke unilateral spatial neglect: virtual reality-based navigation and detection tasks reveal lateralized and non-lateralized deficits in tasks of varying perceptual and cognitive demands. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2018;15(1):34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sureshkumar K, Murthy G, Natarajan S, et al. Evaluation of the feasibility and acceptability of the 'Care for Stroke' intervention in India, a smartphone-enabled, carer-supported, educational intervention for management of disability following stroke. BMJ Open. 2016;6(2):e009243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum R, Kelly C, Quinby E, et al. Systematic review of mobile health applications in rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(1):115–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palanica A, Docktor MJ, Lieberman M, et al. The need for artificial intelligence in digital therapeutics. Digit Biomark. 2020;4(1):21–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peng W, Kanthawala S, Yuan S, et al. A qualitative study of user perceptions of mobile health apps. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SB, Wang YY, Zhang QE, et al. Cognitive behavioral therapy for post-stroke depression: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2018;235:589–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. 1988;19(12):1497–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brott T, Adams HP, Jr., Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale. Stroke. 1989;20(7):864–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, et al. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131–2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matamala-Gomez M, Maisto M, Montana JI, et al. The role of engagement in teleneurorehabilitation: a systematic review. Front Neurol. 2020;11:354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dicianno BE, Parmanto B, Fairman AD, et al. Perspectives on the evolution of mobile (mHealth) technologies and application to rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2015;95(3):397–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom J, Sweeney G, Whiteson J, et al. Mobile health and cardiac rehabilitation in older adults. Clin Cardiol. 2020;43(2):118–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallet K, Shamloul R, Pugliese M, et al. RecoverNow: a patient perspective on the delivery of mobile tablet-based stroke rehabilitation in the acute care setting. Int J Stroke. 2019;14(2):174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Wang T, Zhang Z, et al. The current status of stroke-related smartphone applications available to adopt in China: a systematic review study. Medicine. 2020;99(27):e20656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchak P, Ameer K, Gaylard J, et al. Improving patients experience in a neuro-rehabilitation unit using tablet computers. EJPCH. 2016;4(2):289.
   Google Scholar
• Greysen SR, Khanna RR, Jacolbia R, et al. Tablet computers for hospitalized patients: a pilot study to improve inpatient engagement. J Hosp Med. 2014;9(6):396–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey SA, Stuck RE, Chong AW, Barg-Walkow LH, et al. Mobile health apps: improving usability for older adult users. Ergon Des. 2019;27(4):4–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135(10):e146–e603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar