What facilitates the acceptance of technology to promote social participation in later life? A systematic review

References

• Douglas H, Georgiou A, Westbrook J. Social participation as an indicator of successful aging: an overview of concepts and their associations with health. Aust Health Rev. 2017;41(4):455–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiao C, Weng LJ, Botticello AL. Social participation reduces depressive symptoms among older adults: an 18-year longitudinal analysis in Taiwan. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour H. Social participation and the health and well-being of Canadian seniors. Public Health Rep. 2021;23(4):1B.
   Google Scholar
• Lin N, Ensel WM. Life stress and health: stressors and Resources. Am Sociol Rev. 1989;54(3):382–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponce MS, Rosas RP, Lorca MB. Social capital, social participation and life satisfaction among Chilean older adults. Rev Saude Publica. 2014;48(5):739–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Xu L, Min J, et al. Social participation and life satisfaction among widowed older adults in China. J Gerontol Geriatr. 2016;5(5):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Moen P, Dempster-McClain D, Williams RM. Social integration and longevity: an event history analysis of women’s roles and resilience. Am Sociol Rev. 1989;54(4):635–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minagawa Y, Saito Y. Active social participation and mortality risk among older people in Japan: results from a nationally representative sample. Res Aging. 2015;37(5):481–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James BD, Boyle PA, Buchman AS, et al. Relation of late-life social activity with incident disability among community dwelling older adults. J Gerontol Series A Biol Sci. 2011;66A(4):467–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosier J, Noreau L, Rochette A. Social participation of older adults in Quebec. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004;16(5):406–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goll JC, Charlesworth G, Scior K, et al. Barriers to social participation among lonely older adults: the influence of social fears and identity. PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0116664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piškur B, Daniëls R, Jongman MJ, et al. Participation and social participation: are they distinct concepts? Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(3):211–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levasseur M, Richar L, Gauvin L, et al. Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: proposed taxonomy of social activities. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71(12):2141–2149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P, Cloutier R, Bergeron H, et al. The quebec classification: disability creation process. Lac St-Charles (QC): International Network on the Disability Creation Process; Canadian Society for the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Levasseur M, Desrosiers J, Tribble DS-C. Comparing the disability creation process and international classification of functioning, disability and health models. Can J Occup Ther. 2007;74(5_suppl):233–242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cardol M, de Jong BA, van den Bos GAM, et al. Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(1):27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fozard JL. Gerontechnology and perceptual motor-function: new opportunities for prevention, compensation, and enhancement. Gerontechnol. 2001;1(1):5–24.
   Google Scholar
• Fozard JL, Rietsema J, Bouma H, et al. Gerontechnology: creating enabling environments for the challenges and opportunities of aging. Educ Gerontol. 2000;26(4):331–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotten SR, Anderson W, McCullough B. The impact of ICT use on loneliness and contact with others among older adults. Gerontechnology. 2012;11(2):161.
   Google Scholar
• Bouma H, Fozard JL, Bouwhuis DG, et al. Gerontechnology in perspective. Gerontechnology. 2007;6(4):190–216.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson J, Takahashi PY, Pecina JL. Emerging technologies to support independent living of older adults at risk. Care Manag J. 2013;14(1):58–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meiland FJM, Bouman AIE, Sävenstedt S, et al. Usability of a new electronic assistive device for community-dwelling persons with mild dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(5):584–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turjamaa R, Pehkonen A, Kangasniemi M. How smart homes are used to support older people: an integrative review. Int J Older People N. 2019;14:e12260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers W, Fisk A. Toward a psychological science of advanced technology design for older adults. J Gerontol B: Psychol Sci Sco Sci. 2010;65B(6):645–653.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz R, Wah H-W, Matthews JT, et al. Advancing the aging and technology agenda in gerontology. Gerontologist. 2015;55(5):724–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piau A, Campo E, Rumeau P, et al. Aging society and gerontechnology: a solution for an independent living? J Nutr Health Aging. 2014;18(1):97–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micera S, Bonato P, Tamura T. Gerontechnology advanced solutions for. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2008;27(4):10–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Bronswijk JEMH, Bouma H, Fozard JL, et al. Defining gerontechnology for R&D purposes. Gerontechnology. 2009;8(1):3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Nef T, Ganea RL, Müri RM, et al. Social networking sites and older users–a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2013;25(7):1041–1053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leist AK. Social media use of older adults: a mini review. Gerontology. 2013;59(4):378–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto-Bruno ÁC, García-Casal J, Csipke E, et al. ICT-based applications to improve social health and social participation in older adults with dementia. A systematic literature review. Aging Ment Health. 2017;21(1):58–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker S, Warburton J, Waycott J, et al. Combatting social isolation and increasing social participation of older adults through the use of technology: a systematic review of existing evidence. Australas J Ageing. 2018;37(3):184–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demiris G, Hensel BK. Technologies for an aging society: a systematic review of “smart home” applications. Yearb Med Inform. 2008;3:33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Peek ST, Wouters E, Van Hoof J, et al. Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(4):235–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Stroulia E, Nikolaidis I, et al. Smart homes and home health monitoring technologies for older adults: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2016;91:44–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira L, Dias A, Queirós A, et al. Technologies for ageing in place: a systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses. Communications in Computer and Information Science. vol. 881. Cham: Springer; 2008. (Peixoto N, Silveira, Ali H., Maciel C., van den Broek E. (eds) Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies).
   Google Scholar
• Lee LN, Kim MJ. A critical review of smart residential environments for older adults with a focus on pleasurable experience. Front Psychol. 2019;10:3080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peek STM, Luijkx K, Rijnaard MD, et al. Older adults’ reasons for using technology while aging in place. Gerontechnology. 2016;62:226–237.
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Institute of Health Research. A guide to knowledge synthesis. 2016 Jul 28 [cited 2020 Jul 09]. Available from: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/29418.html#2.
   Google Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P. La funambule, le fil et la toile. Transformations réciproques du sens du handicap. Quebec: Les Pressed de l’Université Laval; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Retired Persons report. Social isolation: myths vs realities among older adults age 40 and older. 2018 Jul [cited 2020 Jul 09]. Available from: https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/research/surveys_statistics/life-leisure/2018/social-isolation-myths-vs-realities.doi.10.26419-2Fres.00234.001.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EndNote-Clarivate Analytics. 2017; [cited 2020 Oct 31]. Available from: http://endnote.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the prisma statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centre for Reviews and dissemination. Systematic Reviews. CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. York: University of York CRD; 2009. https://www.york.ac.uk/crd/guidance/
   Google Scholar
• Crowe M, Sheppard L, Campbell A. Comparison of the effects of using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool versus informal appraisal in assessing health research: a randomised trial. Int J Evid-Based Hea. 2011;9(4):444–449.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Popay J, Roberts Sowden A, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. ESRC Methods Program. 2006 April; [Cited 2020 Jul 09]. Available from: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.178.3100&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne A, Trenwit L, Zubrinich S, et al. “I feel less lonely”: what older people say about participating in a social networking website. Quality Ageing Older Adults. 2010;11(3):25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Beckenhauer JIL, Armstrong J. Exploring relationships between normative aging, technology, and communication. Marriage Fam Rev. 2009;45(6–8):825–844.
   Google Scholar
• Do B, Moore K, Scott P, et al. Rural carers online: a feasibility study. Aust J Rural Health. 2008;16(4):221–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Encuentra E, Pousada M, Gómez-Zúñiga B. ICT and older people: beyond usability. Educ Gerontol. 2009;35(3):226–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatto SL, Tak SH. Computer, internet, and E-mail use among older adults: benefits and barriers. Educ Gerontol. 2008;34(9):800–811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlow L. Technology use by older adults and barriers to using technology. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2014;32(3):271–280.
   Google Scholar
• Jones T, Kay D, Upton P. An evaluation of older adults use of iPads in eleven UK care-homes. Int J Mob Hum Comput Interact. 2013;5(3):62–76.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson E, Nilsson I, Larsson Lund M. Participation in social internet-based activities: five seniors’ intervention processes. Scand J of Occup Ther. 2013;20(6):471–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard K, Hebblethwaite S. Exploring community inclusion in older adulthood through the use of computers and tablets. Ther Recreation. 2017;51(4):8526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann WC, Belchior P, Tomita MR, et al. Barriers to use of traditional telephone by older adults with chronic health conditions. OTJR. 2005;25(4):160–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann WC, Belchior P, Tomita MR, et al. Computer use by middle-aged and older adults with disabilities. Technol Disabil. 2005;17(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Nyman A, Isaksson G. Togetherness in another way: internet as a tool for togetherness in everyday occupations among older adults. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22(5):387–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojembe BU, Kalu ME. Television, radio, and telephone: tools for reducing loneliness among older adults in Nigeria. Gerontechnol. 2019;18(1):34–36.
   Google Scholar
• Opalinski L. Older adults and the digital divide: assessing results of a web-based survey. J Techn Hum Serv. 2001;18(3–4):203–221.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal RL. Older computer-literate women: their motivations, obstacles, and paths to success. Educ Gerontol. 2008;34(7):610–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders EJ. Maximizing computer use among the elderly in rural senior centers. Educational Gerontology. 2004;30(7):573–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaportzis E, Clausen MG, Gow AJ. Older adults perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: a focus group study. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenker JA, Paquet VA. new conceptual model for assistive technology outcomes research and practice. Assist Technol. 2004;16(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durodolu OO. Technology Acceptance Model as a predictor of using information system’ to acquire information literacy skills. Libr Philos Pract. 2016;1450. Available from: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1450
   Google Scholar
• Chen K, Cha AHS. A review of technology acceptance by older adults. Gerontechnology. 2011;10(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Gell NN, Rosenber DE, Demiris G, et al. Patterns of technology use among older adults with and without disabilities. Gerontologist. 2015;55(3):412–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitzner TL, Boron JB, Fausset CB, et al. Older adults talk technology: technology usage and attitudes. Comput Hum Behav. 2010;26(6):1710–1721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong SJ, Thong JYL, Tam KY. Understanding continued information technology usage behaviour: a comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decis Support Syst. 2006;42(3):1819–1834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawley-Hagu H, Boulton E, Hall A, et al. Older adults’ perceptions of technologies aimed at falls prevention, detection or monitoring: a systematic review. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(6):416–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis JE, Neider MB. Designing an wearable technology for an aging population. Ergon Des. 2017;25(3):4–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar