One World Project's Wheelchair Skills Training Camp in Morocco - effects of a community peer-based programme

References

• Bright T, Wallace S, Kuper H. A systematic review of access to rehabilitation for people with disabilities in low- and middle-income Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;02(10):15.
   Google Scholar
• Cott CA. Client-centred rehabilitation: client perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(24):1411–1422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. Disability and development report: realizing the sustainable development goals by, for and with persons with disabilities. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Filmer D. Disability, poverty, and schooling in developing Countries: results from 14 Household Surveys. World Bank Econ Rev. 2008;22(1):141–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trani J-F, Bakhshi P, Bellanca N, et al. Disabilities through the capability approach lens: implications for public policies Handicap au travers de l’approche par les Capabilités: Quelles implications pour les politiques publiques? Brown Sch Fac Publ. 2011;5(3):143–157. Available from: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/brown_facpubs/34.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. New country classifications by income level: 2019–2020. The World Bank Group. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• High Commission for Planning of Morocco. Moroccan experiance on disability statisticks. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Trani J-F, Bakhshi P, Tlapek S, et al. Disability and poverty in Morocco and Tunisia: a multidimensional approach. J Hum Dev Capab. 2015;16:1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Divanoglou A, Tasiemski T, Augutis M, et al. Active Rehabilitation-a community peer-based approach for persons with spinal cord injury: international utilisation of key elements. Spinal Cord. 2017;55(6):545–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rifkin S, Kangare M. What is participation? ResearchGate. 2002; [cited 2020 Feb 25]; Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311607512_What_is_Participation.
   Google Scholar
• Divanoglou A, Trok K, Jörgensen S, et al. Active Rehabilitation for persons with spinal cord injury in Botswana – effects of a community peer-based programme. Spinal Cord. 2019;57(10):897–905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Word Health Organisation. Guidelines on the provision of manual wheelchairs in less resourced settings [Internet]. 2008; [cited 2020 Aug 31]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/guidelines-on-the-provision-of-manual-wheelchairs-in-less-resourced-settings.
   Google Scholar
• Marchiori C, Bensmail D, Gagnon D, et al. Manual wheelchair satisfaction among long-term users and caregivers: a French study. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(2):181–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirby RL. Wheelchair skills program [Internet]; [cited 2021 Mar 26]. Available from: https://wheelchairskillsprogram.ca/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Keeler L, Kirby RL, Parker K, et al. Effectiveness of the wheelchair skills training program: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019;14(4):391–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Training Packages – International Society of Wheelchair Professionals (ISWP) [Internet]; [cited 2021 Mar 25]. Available from: https://wheelchairnetwork.org/resource-library/training-packages/.
   Google Scholar
• Divanoglou A, Georgiou M. Perceived effectiveness and mechanisms of community peer-based programmes for Spinal Cord Injuries-a systematic review of qualitative findings. Spinal Cord. 2017;55(3):225–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollan E, Harvey L, Simmons J, et al. reliability and validity of the Queensland evaluation of wheelchair skills (QEWS). Spinal Cord. 2015;53(10):743–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Item analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 2000;12(2):96–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho K. d, Gois Júnior MB, Sá KN, et al. Translation and validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) into Portuguese. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2014;54(4):260–267.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Visagie S, Mlambo T, Van der Veen J, et al. Impact of structured wheelchair services on satisfaction and function of wheelchair users in Zimbabwe. 2017, Jan 24; [cited 2019 Dec 17]; Available from: http://repositoriocdpd.net:8080/handle/123456789/1524.
   Google Scholar
• Gross-Hemmi MH, Post MWM, Ehrmann C, et al. Study Protocol of the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) Community Survey. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;96(2 Suppl 1):S23–S34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): L. Erlbaum Associates; 1988. p. 567.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffey L, Bigby C. I feel free’: the experience of a peer education program with Fijians with spinal cord injury. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2018;30(2):175–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilkens OJE, Post MWM, Dallmeijer AJ, et al. Relationship between manual wheelchair skill performance and participation of persons with spinal cord injuries 1 year after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42(3 Suppl 1):65–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström AL, Samuelsson K. Evaluation of manual wheelchairs by individuals with spinal cord injuries. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006;1(3):175–182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Groot S, Post MWM, Bongers-Janssen HMH, et al. Is manual wheelchair satisfaction related to active lifestyle and participation in people with a spinal cord injury? Spinal Cord. 2011;49(4):560–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby RL, Mitchell D, Sabharwal S, et al. Manual wheelchair skills training for community-dwelling veterans with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Schmeler M, Karmarkar A, et al. Test-retest reliability of the functional mobility assessment (FMA): a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;8(3):213–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarsak HI. Functioning Everyday with a Wheelchair (FEW) tools: a review. J Phys Med Rehabil Disabil. 2018;01:7.
   Google Scholar
• Jutai J, Day H. Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS). Technol Disabil. 2002;14(3):107–111.
   Google Scholar